stevenhuang

Reads fine to me.

In a just world, copyright should be abolished with extreme prejudice should it's continued existence prevent humanity from developing aligned artificial super intelligence.

What a maladaptive perspective.

If you want to use LLMs effectively, everything OP said is true. It has been this way since the beginning. There will be a time when long context and compaction will be effective, but now isn't it.

That you would think to ask this shows how out of touch you are.

The vast majority of people wouldn't think twice if that was the trade-off to get connected.

We should be talking instead of governmental oversight, and whether it makes sense to restrict/regulate satellite constellations for science or culture activities.

I think there should be regulation, but clearly the people and the market wants this, so it's going to happen.

And there is regulation. SpaceX works with astronomers and their satellites are coated to reduce glare and use of sun visors for example.

I agree with you. I still stand by the statement because it was a neutral observation that should be stated.

Many people are too morally outraged to think straight anymore, as plainly demonstrated, but who can blame them. Hope they take it as a gentle nudge for them get out of the outrage cycle.

Billionaires are not responsible for this, we the people are. Market forces and society chose this.

You are emotionally disregulated and unable to think critically.

a Chinese model it would not have gotten the same attention

Well, you would be wrong.

This was one of the most famous open graph theory problems lol. I am not a mathematician and even I ran into this when doing generative map design for game dev.

The only thing you've demonstrated here is some very funny confidently incorrect coping behavior.

It's RF vision, it let's you visualize RF sources as a coloured blob overlay in real time.

Do you really think families waste half of what they buy at Costco?

Come on now.

This has been known since VLMs were a thing, that more information can be encoded visually and token efficiency is increased. But it came with performance issues (more hallucinations, etc).

Also I don't think you realize how much dumb stuff is still left on the table. That the market is worth trillions is quite irrelevant here given the dynamism of the field.

It's not a uniquely France thing. It's called heat islands, it's a real thing that happens in dense metros.

Very funny to deride France education when you are the ignorant one here.

Had a Pro 48GB in my Amazon cart at ~$4k CAD, now it's ~$1k higher

Bummer

Wrong. Myself and colleagues know the subject and they are useful in FPGA design. You should stop hallucinating about topics you don't have experience in.

You do what you can to do good within the confines of the parameters available to you.

Ok so you are using an llm without web search, ask it to give you links, and are confused why the links are hallucinated... ?

At this point it's just PEBKAC. You're holding it wrong brother.

There should be a pathology for thinking things must be LLM generated when it's simply not always the case.

People's ability to discern is completely fried.

Yeah you should really familiarize yourself with the history of scientific achievements, it will quickly disabuse you of this notion. What separates is often a thin line and dogged persistence, hardly the chasm you make it seem.

A society changes when enough individuals change. Network effects themselves change when enough individuals change.

This effect is exactly reciprocal--feedback loops as you say--so I'm not sure what is so difficult to understand.

Be the first cause.

Most tasks are human tasks.

this is a social problem.

A society is made up of individuals.

OP is right. One does what they can first.

Just like how saying "well don't use social media!" doesn't work

Sometimes the answer really is that simple.

That's really different

It's really not. I don't think you understand the role capital plays in our economy, like at all.

Nuance is not your specialty, clearly

The one with a weird chip on their shoulder is not the parent I can tell you that much.

It starts somewhere, like with this announcement.

I'm not sure why this is so difficult for you to understand.

You do realize modern neuroscience considers the human brain as "just" a probability engine and that intelligence may well be the ability for an organism to predict well.

doesn’t have a semantic understanding of what it is doing

I hope you realize this is an area of open, active research.

Don't kid yourself.

The high watermark of what can be "solved" (read: one shotted) is rising, and will continue to rise. Look at the gig economy (Fiver etc) for simple programming/design tasks, LLMs have taken over completely with their execution.

Look at his comments here.

Safe to say there's a cognitive block and until he tries to approach this topic in good faith he'll simply never understand. Lol.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48429027

A dominant theory for human cognition is predictive coding

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predictive_coding