For programmatically filling, checkout https://platoforms.com. It even provides a API playground, https://www.platoforms.com/docs/advanced/api-playground/, super easy to test the API on your actual PDF form.
HN user
steveneo
Now would be a good time to remove it. In my experience, it has caused me more trouble than good.
For link mentioned in my questions
[1] FormCan PAYG: https://www.formcan.com/pricing/
[2] PlatoForms: https://platoforms.com
When google announces a new product, the first thing I think about is always when that product will be shut down.
For PDF Online Filling -> platoforms.com
cannot agree more!
I really like Opera and use it as my main browser. Yes, that Chinese company is notorious. Just don't put any spyware in your oversea version. If you have to, please only plant it in Chinese release.
Really disgusting. China is on the road to 1984. A fact is, Xi only has a middle school degree...
I use jet brains Datagrip as well. It is great (for PostgreSQL) but the big issue is, it cannot connect MySQL database in utf8mb4 encoding. The issue is there for years. Dbeaver is great, there is no such issue to connect utf8mb4 MySQL!
I like this service as well: https://www.platoforms.com.
Thanks, I will fix.
I am creator of TextNut. Thanks for your comments. Some of my points:
* Price disclosed - Yes, it is not my false. No way to put price there. I don't want to baiting so I provide trial.
* File save location - You can export at current version, either in page or Library level. I am working on iOS version, after that TextNut will support icloud and dropbox.
* WYSIWYG - I believe this why TextNut is unique with others, it does not mix markdown delimiter with content, also provide a way to switch between markdown and rich mode
* Ulysses - unfortunately, after a few version upgrade, its UI more like Ulysses. Although I prefer you say I "rip-off" from Apple Mail most. Actually, I inherit most ideas from geniuswiki that I made since 2007. (That is why the link, image, footnote using curly bracket { to open popover!) I checked in first line code of TextNut in early of 2011, but I stopped only after very roughly UI code https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CDxHr19UIAEVArE.png:large. Although UI looks more different with current, but basic design idea never be changed since then, 3 panes: doc tree, editor, help(was call `Macro` from geniuswiki), doc title is updated by content, etc. I restarted TextNut dev since the middle of last year, I got a out-sourcing UI designer and give my first version design http://www.textnutwriter.com/img/1.png. After I add Theme in 1.1 version, I set the default theme as current light grey as it can accepted by most writers. In latest 2.1 version, Tree structure doc tree is supported, then final version looks like current. As independent developer, I only invest very small amount money for UI design. I hope users can more focus on core functionalities rather than colour palette at early stage.
In texts.io, it looks all typing render to rich format but no way to get back the markdown in text.
TextNut markup is nearly same with common markdown and you can switch between them. The existed text is also automatically converted. Actually, only 2 major differences. One is ~emphasis~ as emphasis. Another is header uses textile format, i.e., h1. h2. ... format.
I can not find other editors support switching between markup and rich formatting on the fly.
Many thanks for your great comments. The site is just launched, we still need time to figure out a good algorithm to link the list context and make recommendation. We will focus on accurate recommendation first and get more user then gradually create a community.
Yes, List display in order is good, I will fix it.
Thanks for your favour:)
Great comments, thanks!
You hit me down... it is my weakness, I am programmer:(
this is horrible release, buggy, ugly, fast view bar gone. If it is new eclipse, I will switch to Intellij although I use eclipse over 10 years.
good point, I changed it. Now it looks a little ugly, will do improvement later. But anyway, people won't miss that 2 buttons:) Thanks.
OK, I guess this site can not fit your requirement:(
Actually, only one page for entire site which the normal users can see(another page is system admin).... For all links, they are some kind of Ajax stuff, mean your page does not refresh entirely, only necessary content is loaded. This makes the site running very fast(initial loading is slow and the hosting maybe a problem as it is just 128M VPS)
I guess the page you view is created long time ago. Now, the new page has shorter key, so normally, it would be really shorter...
My targeting is some team, organisation. As you can see, it has download version. 5 users is free.
I already working on it for 2 years, so it is definitely no problem to another 6 months:)
The reasons is, it is my part time job, I have no worries about my living budget.
Anyway, you also can download and hosting yourself.