stevenally

"He wasn't convicted for that". Maybe that's the point. Maybe he should have been.

The AI should be doing the reading, then deciding what to do, then doing it, right? While you are at the beach, or unemployed. That's what Sam says.

Decoupling between layers will be essential!

You then don't need to "break the speed boundary".

"Trite as the gh issue is and surely this is thankless work, the bottom line and reality is that rsync is a cornerstone for a lot of sensitive pipelines".

Maybe don't piss off the maintainer then?

If we don't even know the ratio between amortized capital expenses and operational costs, outside investor analysis is impossible.

And yet we surely need this data for the IPO? Or are they relying on rule changes on the indexes to force ETFs to buy shares?

They are abusing our trust. That's the issue.

It's true though, isn't it.... The question is do they use it?

"Rolling their own seems silly".

But isn't AI going to destroy all current software vendors?? Everybody is going to roll their own?? In fact, AIs will handle all support autonomously?? I mean they can spin up their database if needed?? What more do they need?

Hence the SAAS apocalypse...

Oh wait... this sarcasm will get me targeted by the LessWrong AI god when he/she/it becomes omnipotent....

Depends how the farming is done....

https://www.ted.com/talks/allan_savory_how_to_fight_desertif...

"But then how can the former category continue to fulfill their obligations?".

They can't. Just like the steel workers who lost their jobs in the 1970's.

Good point. There is a difference between using AI as a translator and using AI to write comments from scratch... Maybe the HN guide lines could reflect this.

"then I am hopefully helping decrease the return advertisers get by using personal information".

Arguably, clicking on the ad but never buying would have a stronger negative affect. The advertiser pays for your click but gets no return...

I use an adblocker too.

In the USA California, Texas, Delaware etc all have different company registration and compliance processes. This has not damaged the business environment.

It should be left to each EU country to decide how to manage their company compliance processes. Those companies can then easily trade all over the EU.

You can easily set up a company in Ireland.

The EU does not to over reach with one-size-fits-all regulations. That will eventually lead to it's dissolution. It needs to concentrate on maintaining a free trade area.

Crappification is a better word.

"I think it continues to be under-appreciated how much of a lead Tesla still has in EVs".

As long as you don't compare them to BYD etc.

This is a really excellent essay. Deserves to be widely read.

Exactly. Occasionally a really good well designed reliable product comes along. But then over time time it gets crappified. The only exception seems to be some open source software.

NVidia only owns 4% of Intel. They won't be able to dictate it's direction.

Finally AGI is here......

"Because the customer wasn't the user - it was their boss and shareholders".

Previous management fads: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_fad

Obviously in the right contexts, these methods provided value. But they became widely misapplied, causing a lot of harm.

And the Wikipedia list is far from exhaustive.