HN user

stevedt

43 karma
Posts1
Comments18
View on HN

Just my anecdotal experience: the people who should be coding will find a way to start coding.

The barrier to entry is so low -- talking about learning to code, not necessarily finding employment. I have tried with coworkers and family members who wanted to do it for the money and their heart just wasn't in it.

Perhaps a better tag line would be "duplication is far cheaper than a bad abstraction".

The take-away from the article for me is if subsequent activity (the changes requiring parameters and if-branches) show it was or has become a bad abstraction, then undo the abstraction and re-introduce the duplication.

But how your body reacts to food has an effect on how hungry you get. It's easier to eat fewer calories if you aren't as hungry.

And the whole point of the article is that we differ significantly on how are bodies respond to food.

I was in the ER with what I expected was (and turned out to be kidney stones). I was stunned when the doctor's first question was something like "what is your expected outcome of this visit?".

I mumbled something like "make the pain go away and not come back".

More generally, when you are coordinating activity with others.

If the code being deployed requires announcements to users, Help Desk people, changes to other applications, changes do documentation, etc., then these are not "artificial" at all.