staticautomatic

The real biggest unlock is not using unlock as a noun.

How does a $25B offering have $85B in orders?

Yep. I sure do.

You can’t interview effectively by limiting yourself to questions where the applicant knows what you want them to say.

If you're going to have people use AI regularly, it's worth asking so that you can get a sense of their interest/willingness, experience level, and training needs. That said, more specific questions are typically more revealing. Personally I'm fond of "If you could give Claude only 1 instruction, what would it be?"

In what way is “How are you using AI?” an objectively bad question?

Communes typically fall apart when bad apples join and the commune fails to get rid of them.

Biology? Why?

Clean. This comment is the right shape.

Friendly reminder that you don't have to enable PostHog replays at all. I have a site lightly instrumented server-side with the slim bundle, and I'm still gonna double check my account settings but I'm pretty sure it's not even capable of doing the replay telemetry.

Municipal insurers already do that

It also posits that there are only two sides.

Doesn't McMaster Carr still use sprites? Is that like the one optimization they managed to get wrong?

Is this not often trivially solved with islands?

No. Prophet is based on curve-fitting.

Guys they're just disclaiming warranties relax

That's not how jury selection works. You never have enough peremptory strikes to "dismiss a huge fraction of the jury pool."

It’s actually not that uncommon to lose a ton of people for cause in cases that are a good fit for a transfer of venue motion. But of course it does come down to the trial judge. I don’t understand who this “next judge” is that you’re referring to.

Not peremptory strikes, but you have unlimited removals for cause (and admittedly a steep appellate hill to climb if they’re unfairly denied)

You’re always on your own to collect.

I’ll see your Art and raise you Life https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=aEdrey6U5dU&pp=ygUSVGVjaGNydW5...

How does one get involved?

I can't speak for the Mamiya Press but the Zeiss Planar 80mm f/2.8 for the Graflex XL is rad.

I did expect there to be more strong applicants, but that hardly means I expect "perfect" applicants or "cream of the crop for nothing." With one role, for example, there are basically unqualified people, and qualified people who won't accept the top of our range (~$120K).

I have multiple open roles right now and am finding that I can’t afford to hire the top applicants. I honestly did not expect to have so little leverage.

Don't forget the Native Americans in Peter Pan!

Just dropping by to say how much I passionately hate documentation that uses fib() as an example.

Well, it would probably need to be part of a physical product and not software alone unless the vendor is dumb and forgot to disclaim the warranty (see https://repository.law.uic.edu/jitpl/vol16/iss2/6/).

Second, it’s not exactly about whether the change constitutes a drop in quality but whether it renders the product unfit for its ordinary purpose. The argument would essentially be that the change is a deliberately introduced defect.

It’s a little weird but a plausible claim given the right facts.

As a lawyer I think this could potentially be litigated as a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability.

I wonder how this compares to Technical Pan, which I imagine it was modeled after.