stargrazer

Docker runs better on Linux. And Linux doesn't reboot unless told to do so. And you can SSH into it rather than run some sort of long winded GUI. Oh, and it doesn't phone home all the time with 'telemetry'.

Kinda cuts into their revenue streams if they can't release anything better/faster/stronger.

Also for all the hype for AGI, or whatever the current tag is, it is getting stopped dead in it's track if they can't go beyond private release to the public.

And if they do release these to the public, are the releases going to be so brain dead due to brain-blocks, is it going to be worth it?

What is the whole point, then, of making these models bigger/better?

I wish these articles would provide some idea as to the development environments. Are these captive large C++ environments, or general 'everyone does this' web development with React, or something in between?

You could try running notepad++ in wine, the windows emulator

But I suppose that doesn't really answer your question. Linux is/was a compendium of a bunch of little tools you string together. Many/Most/All of the items in Notepad++ can be found as smaller independent tools.

The real addicts will use console tools like VIM or EMACS to do their editing (not really GUI, but powerful).

As an alternate alternate, try using Visual Studio Code (VSC). Not quite as light weight as Notepad++, but very functional.

On Linux, I'll use KWrite to do my basic editing. I'll revert to VSC when heavy editing is required.

I'm not a Rust programmer, yet, but this is enticing. This appears to be building a language to be compiled with LLVM as a standalone executable.

However, in C++ there is a mechanism via libraries such as Boost::Spirit where a parser can be built inline and compiled inline (no separate compilation step) and used within the C++ application on input streams.

Is this a capability available within the Rust ecosystem?

Will these intro AI systems then mature to be senior devs who can then mentor more junior AIs? Then we won't need any devs? Isn't that the end goal, AI runs the company and we can all go fishing?

To go along with this, the ACM has a recent article on Automatically Translating C to Rust. It gets into the challenges of 'understanding code and structure' so that the end result reflects the intent of the code, not the actual execution paths.

https://cacm.acm.org/research/automatically-translating-c-to...

Is there an easier way to get around all the complicated cookie selection? I don't care if they have 183 trackers. Do I need all those? Are the important to me? I suppose they are important to them. Isn't there just a 'no to all' or at least a 'just the bare minimum for state management'?

They never showed how they stopped the truck. It could have been anyone.

The title has nothing to do with the link. Correct link?

Probably meant this: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-10-29/wall-stre...

'The trade, dubbed a “box spread,” carried a kind of mystique. By combining two opposing options positions — one bullish, one bearish — Yang built a strategy that mimics a fixed-rate loan: upfront cash now, repayment at a set date, and a locked-in cost in between.'

Deny All, Accept All, but I never (except in a handful of cases) see the Accept Required. Let us admit that there are cookies required for maintaining state within a web site and account.

I default to Deny All, but click on Accept Required when I see it (trusting that it does do what it says it does)

reolink, also look at the frigate nvr software, they have a list for decent recommendations

How do you "detect specific signals in their DNS configurations"? The naive answer is you have access to dns hosters. Or from cookies? or ... ?

but then, why code with exceptions, why not perform pre-flight/pre-validation checks and minimize exceptions to the truly unknown?

I guess training LLMs on works of fiction/sci-fi would not be of net benefit. No distinction between reality and perceived reality. Considering LLMs have a hallucination problem as it is.

I appreciate your work, Bolderman. Sorry to see it go. May the future be fruitful.

go into your browser history and follow the time frame and trail. in firefox, the browser history is very detailed.

How would cmake enter the picture? if you have nested CMakeLists.txt files, cmake appears to build within nested directories for 'add_subdirectory' invocations. Does that help with the cache directory conflict?

It explicitly says using a single picture. Wouldn't the world become even more expressive if multiple pictures could be added, such as in a photogrammetry scenario?

"If training-related crawling continues to dominate while referrals stay flat, creators face a paradox: feeding AI systems without gaining traffic in return. Many want their content to appear in chatbot answers, but without monetization or cooperation, the incentive to produce quality work declines."

Are there any resources which discuss ways of achieving balance? Perhaps by including references or bibliography or citations for content used in top of page summaries?

Will the well run dry for current content?

It is probably the latest in design, but, ... can the text be lightened up? Or provide a CSS toggle to use a different template? it is uncomfortable to trying to read whatever it is you wrote.

Probably not, based upon the extent to which enterprises have been integrated with Windows. Enterprises use a lot of functionality which is not really visible to the casual user. All that functionality would need to be retrofitted into Linux and we get right back into the whole bloat cycle again.

I wouldn't have minded the newly inserted ads in Netflix or Prime Video. But they just throw the ads in during mid-sentence. Are they putting ads in using a random number generator? What happened to the accepted practice of putting in ads where they natural break occurs? It really throws out the flow of the moment. Major irritation. You know, how TV and Cable typically have done it.

Use C++ with one of the following:

Boost.Spirit https://www.boost.org/library/latest/spirit/ Boost.Parser https://www.boost.org/library/latest/parser/ (which I think succeeds Boost.Spirit Boost.Metaparse: https://www.boost.org/doc/libs/latest/doc/html/metaparse.htm...

All of these allow you to build a parser using C++ syntax and then add semantic or composed actions.

which would be explained that those contribute very little to weighting, and so like extrapolating beyond the last end-point, errors accumulate significantly.

Took a few mind shifts to get around what the commenter said vs what exists beyond the link.

The link actually goes to an article with some code snippets which aren't c++. Going to the repository, seems to be .net/c#/f#.

So... for the c++ readers, this isn't c++ related :-)

Does any one want an original computer and monitor? I think mine are still functional.

Ok, but these comparisons seem to be geared towards gaming, ... how do these cards compare in terms of machine learning with pytorch/libtorch and such? Say if I'm trying to train an LSTM/Conv model, or maybe even a small llama?

Interesting, but why post it? Nothing seems to have been committed/updated in about 6 years. There are a number of PRs outstanding. Is it still in use?

The forum implies that not much maintenance happened after the passing of the primary contributor, even if there were good intentions.

Are there other constraint solvers which have subsumed this one?

Some one has to gain the original knowledge to build the original content and form cohesive arguments which can then be sucked up and hallucinated by LLMs to convey to the masses in some sort of incohesive fashion. Can an LLM create a 7 minute read article from only a few nebulous thoughts? Will it take as much time to coach an LLM into something to be read as it would taken to write the original article unaided?