HN user

spaceman_2020

18,330 karma
Posts13
Comments2,389
View on HN

A prompt went viral recently where people were sharing their pictures and asking chatgpt to visualise what their looksmatched partner would look like

The result was always someone extremely good looking

There’s going to be an entirely new class of mental disorders that will emerge from people being deluded by AI

Wild that we all lived exactly the same way before AI

Really changed so little in my life. I just use chatgpt instead of Google search now

It's being marketed as some ground breaking revolutionary change when all it is is a better widget

Remove it and the worst that will happen is that I'll go back to writing my emails and my code by hand - something I've done for the last 20 years anyway

Dario can reverse this by going on the podcast circuit again and threatening everyone with 75% job losses due to (his) AI this time

Ramp the number up to 85% if that doesn’t work

If it still doesn’t work, go nuclear and target 100% job losses language

A major turnoff for me has been the American AI labs’ marketing

It’s either constant fear mongering (Anthropic), regulatory threats and corporate chicanery (OAI), low quality sloppification (xAI), or ‘ummm we have AI too guys’ (Gemini)

The worst culprit is Anthropic. Every two weeks he pops up on some random podcast with dire predictions of AI killing 50% of all jobs. It’s the constant “us our AI or else…” rhetoric that’s made the regular guy really hate AI

There is almost no positive sum outcome rhetoric from these labs

And I hate that

So I'm supposed to hate this because of what China MIGHT do in a future neither you nor I can predict?

Ironically, the people who can afford to have in-house help to handle things like cooking and folding clothes - the rich - also tend to be fitter and more active

Maybe if you can shave an hour every day from chores, you will actually have the energy to enjoy physical activities

Every single thing that’s come out of China in the entire AI/Robotics space lately has been a massive net positive for the world

Open Source is a good thing, regardless of where it comes from

The entire debate about distilled vs not distilled is just academic. As an end user, I don’t give a crap how the model was trained as long as it does the job affordably enough

I see all of AI as theft anyway so it makes no ontological difference if the theft was from a human or from another AI

It’s creating this weird flatness everywhere where people are using it to create things that don’t matter (LinkedIn posts, dull corporate presentations). But because everyone is also using it for the exact same purposes, the same things now matter even less

LinkedIn posts never really mattered. But because everyone is now using broadly the same tools and prompts to create LinkedIn posts, the posts matter even less now

Opus 4.8 is genuinely one of the most frustrating models in casual use. It has a tendency to completely lose context in the middle of a conversation. It’s also too pedantic and nitpicky, and relies on language that’s way too specific to get any work done. I always end up being frustrated with it and revert to opus 4.6

Claude Fable 5 1 month ago

Kimi 2.6 has been my workhorse now. It's as good as Opus 4.6, which, to me, was the last "useful" Claude model.

The newer models are smarter but really ficklle and hard to get meaningful work out of

4.6 was a workhorse

It's also such a recursive problem - there aren't enough kids, so your kids don't have enough kids to play with, so you don't have more kids

I remember almost never sitting inside my house after school. I had two elder siblings and we had probably 30 odd kids in my locality. We would all be out all the time. Safety wasn't an issue because there were some older kids in the group too who could be counted on to keep things in line

Now my daughter has just 3-5 kids of her age in my locality, and because they don't have any older siblings, they always have to be accompanied by adults

Claude Opus 4.8 2 months ago

it was also astonishingly lazy. Would just ask me to write test scripts. I asked it to create simple UI buttons for testing some basic functions so I could share it with a client, and it gave me curl commands instead - and then defended it by saying that the UI is wasted work

Frustrating because if I have a tool, I expect a tool to do what I tell it to do. Tools shouldn't have any opinions on how they should be used

Claude Opus 4.8 2 months ago

I think 4.7 was an awful model in actual use. I never got anything out of it and it was frustratingly weird. This feels more like an attempt to course correct and isn't a real bump