HN user

soundoflight

41 karma
Posts0
Comments53
View on HN
No posts found.

https://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v1.0/concepts/glossary/...

You want to keep the amount of different data that you are indexing/tagging on low. As an example with my situation, I was tracking what could be amounted to connections between nodes in a very large tree. I had a lot of distinct pairs, which means that I had a high cardinality. When the cardinality increases a query that used to take a millisecond to load could move to a couple seconds.

From using InfluxDB (up to v0.10 I think it was), it's a great database but performance REALLY depends on the cardinality of your data.

I can't stress it enough, calculate your cardinality before switching over to it. If your cardinality looks good, InfluxDB is a perfect, logical choice. I really enjoyed it and it is dirt simple to figure out. We had a junior dev just out of college with little experience set it up and get a high level of proficiency in a matter of hours.

Edit: I should point out, I was doing about 10 million records on my db (hosted on a Mac Mini in development!) a day with a 2 week sliding window. I was pushing the data from InfluxDB into custom D3 visualizations. I would cache certain queries in Redis, so I wasn't always hitting InfluxDB with each read request.

Also, Xamarin makes .NET runnable on Android with their runtime and compile it down for iOS.

.NET Microframework makes it runnable on IoT.

Firebase gives you a real-time database with no initial setup. The only really big competitor I know of it is RethinkDB. Having "three-way" databinding in a SPA is pretty cool and wouldn't be something that would be trivial to setup without either of these two databases.

I could see Firebase being a great go to for a certain size of project in the small to medium size that would rather pay for this feature set that using AWS, Azure, Rackspace, etc.

MVC 6's name is now also ASP.NET Core MVC 1.x.x. It's really a version number reset. The confusing thing is that it's not plugged through everywhere and people interchange the two regularly.

I've worked on proprietary frameworks very similiar to what the author describes. They are great for the web and in my opinion allow for tighter code. The issue is that I haven't found a good, open-source one for the web.

Also, interesting, is the fact that computer engineer "coding" is much more into the state concepts brought up in the article.

I think that's in opposition to "battle hardened". A wiseman wouldn't take "new and shiny" over "battle hardened".

With that said even with some years under its belt yet the react community is still in a state of flux (no pun intended), and one is signing up for new and shiny for the next couple of years. One should know that and embrace it going in. There is nothing wrong with that. I feel like we are currently in the "walking" phase with React and have stepped out of "crawling". These tools are helping us learn to "run".

Like all questions, it really depends.

I would build out your project entirely first then look for possible optimizations like this. You will need to see how often this content changes, how often it is requested and the cost of regenerating it. In addition to this, you will want to look at the added engineering costs of this.

If it's something that rarely changes, I usually just have a background job generate it and serve it as static content, but only if it is accessed a lot.

As an Opera user, there has been many times where the in-page content searching has helped me find stuff. When I'm in different browsers, that loses its usefulness. I'll definitely come back to this when the local version is done.

MonoGame.Js 12 years ago

This repo needs some TLC and the Visual Studio stuff removed. The concept is interesting, but it doesn't give any real reason to use it over things that are firmly planted in the JS consciousness (i.e. Phaser)

I like to use CodeSchool, PluralSight and Udemy. If it's pluralsight or udemy, I will stick the speed at 1.5x to 2x. You can burn through a course really quick that way. Also for Pluralsight/Udemy, I skip following along in code and doing exercises and just learn the gist of what is going on and what are the different capabilities.

Once you have gone through the course do a small project. I like something more involved than a "TODO" application.