HN user

solotronics

2,056 karma
Posts3
Comments1,105
View on HN
Hacking Moltbook 6 months ago

Probably have it do 10 trivial for AI but hard for people tasks within a small time frame.

The part people are missing here is that if the trading firms are all doing something, that in itself influences the market.

If they are all giving the LLMs money to invest and the AIs generally buy the same group of stocks, those stocks will go up. As more people attempt the strategy it infuses fresh capital and more importantly signaling to the trading firms there are inflows to these stocks. I think its probably a reflexive loop at this point.

This problem statement was actually where the idea for Proof of Work (aka mining) in bitcoin came from. It evolved out of the idea of requiring a computational proof of work for sending an email via cypherpunk remailers as a way of fighting spam. The idea being only a legitimate or determined sender would put in the "proof of work" to use the remailer.

I wonder how it would look if open source projects required $5 to submit a PR or ticket and then paid out a bounty to the successful or at least reasonable PRs. Essentially a "paid proof of legitimacy".

If you could, theoretically, make a LLM that could actually excel at poker would that mean that it is good at lying to people?

Probably a good time to mention the original mission statement of Bitcoin was to custody your own money without counterparty risk. Time and time again we have seen altcoin ponzis and exchanges collapse under the weight of their fractional reserve. What is still working? Bitcoin.

Greed in this space causes people to act with a more short term view for quick profits while ignoring fundamentals. Over and over again.

It would be interesting to save every single thing you ever see online to a local cache and index it using machine learning so you can search by topic. This is the kind of storage I imagine you could use for something like that.

My subjective opinion is that if you hire experts, not just programmers but experts at aviation programming, then possibly someone would have noticed a gap in the logic of the requirements and systems engineering. Who knows for sure? But I know plenty of contractors who write good code but oftentimes it's the architect level expert that knows what's beyond the code.

Especially when the code is directly responsible for a physical system.

Over 90% of the projects at work I would categorize as "very successful and high business impact" I did on my own and just showed management once I had a minimum proof of concept. This is over my whole career and not specific to an employer. I have thought about this a lot as it relates to prioritization of work.