No. Worse. You're wasting our time
HN user
sockaddr
Yeah it's 100% bullshit. The biggest red flag here isn't the use of AI, it's the author thinking we're dumb enough not to be able to detect it easily. That itself is dumb and makes this whole article easy to disregard.
I read the same comment and thought it made sense too.
Sorry but I think you’re requirement that something only be “the art” if any arbitrary person can critique it is off. The frontier labs are working on the state of the art but it’s just art that you aren’t allowed to see. Unfortunately.
This blog is AI generated garbage.
I miss that as well but more than likely (at least in the US) that "curated" channel you use to listen to was probably owned by Clear Channel and probably the same exact content played in every other city where everyone else felt like it was for them as well.
In fact, duplicates with different approaches over time and different ways of being asked is REALLY good for LLMs
Any company that uses that type of background image definitely churns out AI slop
I'm a huge AI advocate but even I can't get on board with this.
Feel free to fork the kernel and maintain your own vibe-coded disaster.
I'm going to law school there next semester.
So basically you've built a mechanism for a model to de-compress itself.
To add to this, as long as the diff representing the removal of the driver is kept in the git history it would be trivial for someone in the far future to say to an AI agent:
"Please take this linux source and patch the Bus mouse driver back in but match the new driver interface".
With code preserved in git history it's never actually "removed". It's just, disconnected.
Sorry but I think this should be left up to the user to decide how it works and how they want to burn their tokens. Also a countdown timer is better than all of these other options you mention.
Yeah this is actually quite shocking. In my earlier uses of CC I might noodle on a problem for a while, come back and update the plan, go shower, think, give CC a new piece of advice, etc. Basically treating it like a coworker. And I thought that it was a static conversation (at least on the order of a day or so). An hour is absurd IMO and makes me want to rethink whether I want to keep my anthropic plan.
Also a lot of bullet points are bad
Slides should have maybe a sentence of text at most
Proceeds to have slides with many bullet points and more than several sentences of text per.
I don't find issue with the slides as they are but if you're going to make arbitrary rules why not follow them yourself?
Your family is starving and your dog died of radiation poisoning from the fallout but at least your local LLM can browse this and recommend a good software stack for your automated booby traps.
I agree. This is language evolving. If someone from the 16th century could hear a modern well-educated person speak English today they would likely be horrified at how degenerate it would sound to them.
So I don't think current English is in some perfect state that should not change.
On god.
The thought process goes like this:
They're a customer already if they're opening the home screen and they probably already mounted it on their wall so fuck them. Show them ads. Also turn on the microphone in the background (what my Hisense tv does).
Your amazon links are broken. But I think you're missing the point of this thing. This isn't for people that really even care about performance. It's for people that want a laptop that works with their iPhone, does all the things their school needs them to do in a browser, and doesn't come with a complete dogsh*t OS, and isn't of dubious quality like an HP or a "NIAKUN", whatever that is.
Now the color options, that's a tragedy.
Because it's a different operating system?
but the Neo may be proof that decades old macs could run Tahoe, and maybe as well or better than the Neo
The A18 Pro is going to out perform many "decades old" processors, which would you be referring to?
I wouldn't conflate "affordable" with "low-end" in terms of processing speed. Apple is able to get the price to this point because of decisions that the rest of the market did not make.
I'm answering the part of your question about why I post about something that I find works.
Are you this dense in real life or is this an act?
If you're not being paid well, what's the motivation to post things you know don't make any sense to try and sell a brand?
Because it works. Because it does in fact make sense despite your frustration with the concept.
This is quite sad to see someone react to a comment they disagree with by assuming that different opinion is paid for. I'd love it if you dug into my comment history and found even a shred of evidence that I'm being paid to talk positively about my programming language of choice.
I hope there aren't many of your type on here.
Exactly. Here's my experience using LLMs to produce code:
- Rust: nearly universally compiles and runs without fault.
- Python,JS: very often will run for some time and then crash
The reason I think is type safety and the richness of the compiler errors and warnings. Rust is absolutely king here.
I suspect a more general and much more clever learning algorithm will emerge by then and will require less training data to get to a competent problem solving state faster even with dirty data. Something able to discriminate between novel information and junk. Until then I think there will be a quality decline after a few more years.
Sorry but for $5 in credits you can have an agent port over all your bullshit to the next fad. I'll have one port over all my bullshit when the time comes too.
The sad part about this fact is that the tech is mated to a completely rotten ecosystem. If it were sold off I'd be excited to try it.
Exactly. What Meta accomplished could have been done by a team of less than 40 mediocre engineers. It’s really just not even worth analyzing the failure. I am in complete awe when I think about how bad the execution of this whole thing was. It doesn’t even feel real.
That's the only reason that I clicked.