snapcaster

Their comment was thoughtful and at least added to conversation. Your comment is just "LLMs don't really have neurons" which is obvious to literally every user of this site including the person you're responding to. Much prefer their contributions over yours

Why this gaslighting? obviously the massive companies with vested interest in monetizing your attention and data

It didn't require saying, and you're also wrong. They don't have physical neurons like a brain but they are made up of abstractions we all agree to call neurons

okay sure, but also put the fucking graph at the top come on

Good Editors are Invisible would make more sense. I think this only applies to the class of tools we would call "controllers"

at no point are you justifying why this would be FUN. it's like you don't even understand what a game is supposed to be

how would it impact the fun of the game if they weren't?

Obviously you're right, but none of this stuff matters to the dudes who worship him. As long as he keeps making the people they hate angry they'll support him, even at their own expense

games are about fun, if something only adds realism for no reason it's not good game design to add it

you're really reaching for no apparent reason. Just move on from pattern matching machines it's not a good mental model for LLMs

by "we" you mean an extremely small group of people who read lesswrong. Everyone else was immediately wanting to do it

I blame black mirror for this attitude. If you're going to speculate on imaginary futures why can't they be positive?

I hate this crab in a bucket framing. It's so anti-working person. Why isn't it that wages are insanely deflated compared to the US?

Nobody owes you a scientifically rigorous write up

So it's a sci-fi short story? what reason would anyone have to believe this stuff?

I meant this idea that you can quickly iterate on laws. At least in america that's just unrealistic outside of very narrow instances

what's your point here considering you were wrong? in the last 16 years they've been one of the most profitable companies in the history of the earth

you're not engaging with all the political and game theory issues that make that difficult to do in practice. Let alone the uncertainty that impacts businesses (even ones that are acting in good faith)

You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an incorrect world model you'll realize i'm right and you're living in a fantasy theory world

You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an incorrect world model you'll realize i'm right and you're living in a fantasy theory world

"knowledge is good" is such a naive take. Trivial example: You only have knowledge of crimes committed by immigrants but zero knowledge of crimes committed by citizens. How is that good?

It's still extremely corrupt, and done to benefit a very small group of people. Dismissing the criticism like this is directly against the rules and spirit of hackernews to assume good faith

i'm imagining this, and don't see how it has any relation to the discussion

Bro thinks he's on the team

I wish people (nerds like us) would use better language. It's not overpriced, because a product is more than a pile of chips and tech specs. Do you realize you're implicitly assuming CPU speed == product quality and how untrue that is?

It provides incredible value for its price (hours of fun per $) when compared to basically any other form of entertainment

The span of control for the CEO of my company is more or less 1000 people. His number of direct reports is 5

superficial maybe, "toxic" is your own personal idealogy

Do you realize you're fighting a strawman or do you actually think this is a compelling argument?

This is 100% going to be the boot lickiest comment I read all day

maybe engage with it because we're all humans with feelings and they're incredibly powerful computational shortcuts? thinking it's virtuous to be an emotionless automaton is ideology (kinda like feelings!)