smotched

asking these trillion dollar companies to pay a tiny portion of their valuation for the data they're using to profit is not "fighting AI".

with your copyright vision do you think your favorite writers or artists would be putting blood sweat and tears into their work if the publisher just steals it and sells it without giving them a dime?

you may be fine with these companies using your data and selling it back to you but you're also saying its not okay for others to not want to participate. basically people that actually create something of value should be forced to give up that value (not counting your shitty public repo that you call "OSS"). you don't even think they should pay a fair value to train on it, as long as you get create your shitty vibe coded slop, you don't care.

why are you okay with the former

So you're okay with a data hoarding company building AGI having your data but not some journalists having <1% of it?

just because one model is stopped from being released publicly doesnt mean they completely stop. Anthropic has moved on to training the next gen model months ago.

Can you name a model not doing that? openai & anthopic are a lot more aggressive in doing that.

Its not a government issue in those counties, the US government didnt fund anthopic, openai, etc.

cash is bits of paper...

I believe he only designed the interior

Navigation through gps means you're connected to a satelite at all times. has nothing to do with an internet connection. You're directly connected to the U.S. government (Space Force)

what telemetry are you worried about if you're already sharing your exact location at all times (navigation)

a letter??

just remember even the patriot act started with good intentions, to get justice.

you can't really build a perfect system, the goal would be to limit bad actors as much as possible.

again, this is not europe. we don't ride bikes, and we certainly don't walk.

America is not europe, how would public transport work for the last 1/2miles

buy a dying social network for 44bil

merge it with a company created out of thin air for 20bil.

have a third company buy it.

put it back on the market for 1.5 trillion.

Autopilot doesnt turn on the turn signal or change lanes, what you are dealing with is humans.

there are many times where I just do it myself and it thinks it did well.

I would advice them to get ready for what comes next, past experience says it will not be good.

Whats the bad practices valve is doing in gambling?

since Anthropic is one of the only companies using the Bun Runtime, not just the bundler like most do, they want to make sure the runtime stays the focus. This is good for both companies and us tbh since they wont switch focus to whats popular at the moment

That doesn't matter when all your neighbors have one, and the one in front of you has theirs pointed directly at your house.

why isn’t my iPhone doing any of this yet?

Ok its doing it in 4 or 5 products, but thats a joke.

Not every AI product is a chatbot.

So that case was not brought forth the supreme court for them to rule on? They rule on that specific case.

They didn't draw the line there, that's case that was brought forth. That's how the courts work.

I've given you the most direct example anyone can give, a journalist that was legally handed a prison sentence for basic speech. There are more cases in other EU countries in the article, just read.

It would help to read the article we're discussing.

Journalist posted a fake image online of the interior minister holding a sign that read “I hate freedom of opinion” and was subsequently handed a seven-month suspended prison sentence. A woman who posted images of politicians with painted-on Hitler mustaches and called a minister a terrorist was fined about $690.

Could you give examples of when a U.S. citizens speech rights were legally taken away? Lets go with one of your examples of "When sexual minorities want to speak". Please elaborate.

None of the examples you gave are actually examples of speech being restricted. Its people (sometimes politicians) freely voicing their opinions on others speech, that is not restriction.

How is it asinine? they both restrict speech and they both have no concept of "freedom of speech". The only difference is what they choose to censor.