skinfaxi

Isn't most creative work synthesis rather than unique whole-cloth creation? Look at what happens with software when it is open sourced and allowed to be remixed freely. Are we better or worse off because of it?

What does this mean in practice? Surely no AI-managed company could become public by way of lack of accountability and governance.

it did enable a lot of good work to happen.

How do we know that when we don't have a copy of the world without this regime? How much more and greater works could have been produced without such a repressive system?

A really successful work becomes part of the culture, and remixing, derivatives and other modes of integrating cultural artifacts are prohibited. Why should we allow corporations to own our culture?

Thus, only those who are financially independent could afford to publish. Because the world really needs more rich class propaganda…

Yes, all the rich class propaganda being pushed by open source developers working on software in their free time.

So will you owe life long compensation for all the knowledge you got from books too?

No because we are people and the laws differ for people, corporations, and machines.

I think the Unabomber came to a similar conclusion regarding nuclear and the concentration of society-ending power resting with a few people.

Doom for whom?

Is it a design or implementation flaw?

Seems like false advertising.

The cops stood outside Uvalde. There was an army of police and they stood outside. There is no duty to protect in the US.

To what end? What would it do with the compute beyond earn more money to pay for its own compute?

Since the hack, officials restored their website and posted a message announcing they are rebuilding the agency's entire network from scratch. Even if the hacker claims they deleted backups, the agency appears to have had an offline copy, otherwise things would have gotten really messy over the coming months in Romania.

So it seems not all has been lost. I was worried about the societal implications of being unable to prove land ownership but it seems that may be avoided.

While I think your interpretation is possibly overly charitable, I agree my comment was unwarranted and unnecessary. I can't delete it at this point.

What does a developed taste look like to you when expressed in words?

Yes, kind of obvious from the .gov right?

Oh yeah, as a practical matter I totally agree though lack of enforcement invites more participation by other actors.

For human beings, profit motive is driven by material wants and needs. What would drive the profit motive for an AI agent? Whatever the human sets as the target? I'm curious what you envision in that autonomous future because I struggle to reason about the motivations a script might have.

Why?

Interdiction at the ports. Seizure of persons related to the enterprise crossing into the jurisdiction.

I think it uses a silver oxide battery which is not rechargeable.

Don't many people have poor taste?

Rather than a single, serialized scheduler, we run a fleet of scheduling servers which handle sandbox creation requests concurrently. To handle a creation request, a scheduling server runs a fast scheduling algorithm against in-memory cached data. The result is that scheduling scales horizontally, and looks more like load balancing than traditional container scheduling.

What does this mean? You bucket requests on some attribute and use that to route the request (or create an ordered list of routes to try)?

What you really mean is that there is very low value to the company in appeasing this minor vocal audience. What you forget is that you are posting on a message board to an overlapping audience.

But was it content indistinguishable from someone learning the language being used, for instance?

This is exactly the point I saw in a recent x post, that building anti-bot detection was incredibly difficult because some people exhibit bot like behavior.

Blizzard employee once told me anti-botting in WoW was extremely challenging due to the number of real people that acted identically to bots.

Every assumption was invalidated: - unbelievable # of consecutive hours played - consistently repetitive patterns of movement and clicks - farming patterns that aren’t considered fun (“why would anyone do that”) - solo, no external engagement - goes on for months

The problem with botting is many humans ARE bots

https://x.com/IceSolst/status/2076372992959959493

Github link 404s. https://github.com/Simbastack-hq/sentinel

That makes sense but I'm still not so sure—we have things like software architecture patterns that can be discussed at a high level without knowing the intricacies. Like you can be aware of load balancing and even use it but be unaware of how load balancing might work algorithmically.

Let's consider even the original example. > You cannot remove facts like 'paris is capital of france' from llm and have it just retain 'high level thoughts' like 'countries have capitals that you can look up'

Wouldn't the knowledge that countries have capitals precede the knowledge that Paris is the capital of France?

This says nothing about the accuracy of our own models based on these abstractions that lack the lower-level understanding.

For sure. You cannot have "only higher level thoughts" without doing lower level work

What do you mean? I think people routinely think about things at a very high level with almost no understanding of the lower levels. How many people use a computer each day and reason about them at a very high level while knowing nothing of capacitors, logic gates, or programming languages?

Or it means it is time to update the model. Models need to change as the world they model changes, right?

How does your solution differ from OPs?

edit:

To me it looks like yours has the following negative qualities:

- closed source

- requires signup for some service

- says code doesnt leave my machine but this connects to your servers

- requires Goose AI as a dependency