Poll: Should we rename Amber.js? 15 years ago
Internal version codenames are not recognizable, and are not expected to be used like this (www.macosxlion.com?) With hindsight, there should have been a site at amberjs.com.
HN user
Internal version codenames are not recognizable, and are not expected to be used like this (www.macosxlion.com?) With hindsight, there should have been a site at amberjs.com.
You haven't taken a look at Amber, have you? It is also a javascript framework
It is a bad name for Googleing. Just like Gemstone for another smalltalk, b.t.w.
Wrong conclusion. That means that sproutcore 2.0 is also unlikely to be visible on google. new name.