siva7

As a counterpoint, i've worked with enough math PhD's over my career who couldn't wrap their head intuitively around many concepts from software engineering, while others had no problems in doing so even from folks without any stem background. We often undererstimate how much field knowledge we aquire over the years and overestimate how easy it is for others to catch up.

is this a joke? namecheap did years ago the brave move by suspending services to russian customers. why should we support a company that seems involved in russian war affairs?

This is historic if all true. So this is what AGI looks like... pretty close to terminator screenplay.

It's funny how you applied on your own argument several logical fallacies about why ai is only a threat to people who have been taught "recipies" versus who know what L1 cache miss is.

Actually it's sad there are people out there dumb enough to believe knowing L1 cache is any different than knowing recipies when it comes to the story which jobs AI will take. I'm convinced by now it will be the jobs of those people believing such crap.

listen... i got agent skills.. im good at talking to agents!!

god thanks ClosedAI is still available

Orwellian speak for ... you won't get paid like our base engineers and when we want to get rid of you, we send you to our Siberian customer because you are a forward deployed engineer haha

Still i want to believe i'm wrong and it's a good job.

That's literally what they're looking for. To filter out ethical founders.

Ok, I'll never use max effort again on OAI models..

Have been long time clauder but honestly codex feels much more liberating. Something you can't buy..

Software people are kind of different than doctors or lawyers.. probably also the reason why they act much more innovative than any other profession up to the point to invent the damn thing that replaces them (and likely wipes out humanity at some point if we believe the plot of terminator or matrix)

I swear some days ago someone here claimed Openai succeeded cutting down their compute cost by half with a breakthrough optimization. So this is it?

I've switched 3 months ago to Codex because Claude got incredibly stupid. 6 months ago vice versa. It doesn't matter if you use Codex or Claude. Both will fuck with you at some point. Though Codex probably less.

I have no doubt any junior, no matter their background or degree, will break into tech fine like all of us did if they are in for the reasons we got in - being nerds and fascinated by software. You can't fake that.

no way fable did this. It would have stopped after the words "command and conquer" and nerfed you to opus (while also landing you on some nsa watch list)

If you need such laws to be enforced in order to keep your workforce on leash... you are either a very uninspiring employer or you are the current german chancellor. Good bye german economy with such an uninspiring leadership.

The opposite was considered two years ago a crazy thing to say. I'm glad this changed and people using ai don't have to hide in the closet anymore for doing so.

So fable will jump more often to Opus than it already did on original release? Working with fable felt like having to constantly fight against your work tool. Frustrating. Now they're making it even more frustrating.

Why would a company explain how limited their own major release is?

They already do. Don't assume the routing will be in your favour

Wow i can't remember the last time i used Gemini or heard techies talking about Google ai.

It saddens me to see how creativity seems to "peak" at "let's go back to how we did it in 20th century" instead of asking the better questions like you did.

That paper had many co-authors and only two who were considered to be the primary drivers and geniuses behind (and they are american citizens).

Asian ai startups have also no way to compare despite making bold claims, and one could argue the whole point of the trump intervention was to prohibit them from distilling faible.

sue? whom? usa? have fun..

So OAI are you also silently dumbing down your models when you detect "inappropriate topics" like Anthropic did with Fable?

How far we have come that 60B could be considered a rounding error for a company

"demand"

I work at some megacorp and have direct insight about any ai use - nope, not a single use case i witnessed used a2a in the final product. I still don't get a2a but you probably have to work at Google or something to see this as the solution to something.

Hi Claude fable, why u not protecting me from malware? Am i not american enough? Not rich enough? Yieks..