sigilis

Seems like a regression if the model is having difficulty communicating clearly.

Oh, did this happen to you personally? If so, you have my sympathies.

If it's just a hypothetical, consider this:

The money doubles and everyone laughs about it in the end.

A lawyer? That’s pretty obvious.

It’s what you do when anyone is in breach of contract or some other civil matter. You just sue them.

If it’s a criminal fraud, there’s other people who will help, we call those the authorities.

To be fair, they did stop to think if they should. The decided that they shouldn't and went ahead and did it anyways.

Fortunately, having a discussion does not appear to be the goal of this blog post. The author is relating a story including their feelings on the matter. It’s not really about us, unless you’re working for a pump company or could possibly address the structural issues that have led to this situation.

Honestly, I found it illuminating. I don’t depend on a machine to keep me alive directly, but it made me think about how much I would resent dangling at the end of a line held by a company that would cut me off if investors thought it would make them slightly richer. One that cuts every corner they can, and doesn’t actually care about you. I imagine that resentment over years, a quarter century of things getting worse on the “caring whether you live or die” front, might lead to the feelings the author expressed.

It’s pretty clear that discussion is not desired, unless you have the cure for type 1 diabetes in hand before you send the first reply.

Yeah, but it's a cool looking cloud. I think the cloud in the video was pretty neat.

If it helps, I don't think that there is anything to be ashamed of to want to try new things even if you recognize it is inadvisable. If there were no physical consequences, I'd like to try all sorts of medicines to see what effect they would have on me.

As a user of Mounjaro, obtained from a doctor, I find the experience very interesting. It has all sorts of weird side effects that I don't expect. As a bioinformatician in training it's great fun to speculate about the causes, pathways, signals, and whatnot that might be involved as this drug perturbs so much stuff in my system.

It's not pleasurable per se, but it is interesting. I have changed my food habits significantly without actually trying. I think I was too impatient to eat to cook if that makes sense. Weirdly, foods taste better to me which I did not expect. I also have found myself really enjoying my hobbies more. This has resulted in a lot of 3d printer filament purchases, so my impulse control may not have been helped much.

As far as experimenting on yourself, it will likely require the cumulative effect of weeks or months to notice changes in non-food habits if such changes occur at all.

There's probably some online doctor that will prescribe this thing to you for several hundred dollars/euros or whatever. You may suffer greatly for your curiosity, though. There are instances of very unpleasant side effects, some of which I experience personally.

You aren’t cloudflare’s customer in these examples. It depends on the companies that are actually paying for and using the service to complain. Odds are that they won’t care on your behalf due to how our society is structured.

Not really sure how our community is supposed to deal with this.

There are various links in the article that have more information. Clicking these references will give the evidence for bad unit economics claims and whatnot.

As for predicting the moment, the author has made a prediction and wants it to be wrong. They expect the system will continue to grow larger for some time before collapse. They would prefer that this timeline be abbreviated to reduce the negative economic impacts. He is advising others on how to take economic advantage of his prediction and is likely shorting the market in his own way. It may not be options trading, but making plans for the bust is functionally similar.

You are correct. This strategy is not for making you happy with your procrastination. The main goal is to make you an effective human being. As a result, this excludes personal emotional effects from the definition of harm.

Furthermore, what an effective human is also something that you have to define for yourself.

Procrastination is considered a negative trait for a reason.

Task selection is the tricky bit. It has to actually be important in some dimension. The easiest is something with an amount of social pressure. If someone is waiting for you to do something that you have promised, then it acquires a kind of urgency and importance even if it wouldn’t harm you not to do it in a timely manner.

It’s not fake importance, it’s just taking advantage of the fact that you want to be seen as dependable and effective to other people.

“Do this or else we’ll make our products less attractive by not making an effort to comply with your law” does not seem like a really compelling “or else”.

iPhone mirroring was cute when I first tried it, but now when I click on a notification on my laptop and it tries to open the mirroring application I am annoyed. It’s the tiniest version of my phone and takes a while to come up, if it doesn’t fail for some reason. I should turn it off.

The other features they mention aren’t very compelling. I’m in the Netherlands now with a US Apple account so I can use them, but don’t care to.

The structure of giant corporations today is like those centralized societies that were so inefficient in your example. The mandates to put AI in everything are one example of out of touch leadership throwing money and effort blindly towards things of dubious value. The sycophantic managers, afraid that they will be eliminated for insufficient fervor for the board’s latest fascination, will seize upon anything to prove themselves loyal and useful to those above them.

By moving the locus of control, whether it be considered the ceo or shareholders, so far from the actual business and implementing mandates based on whatever the current fancy is and meaningless targets of growth on such a giant scale you get the same sort of excesses.

The current system is marked by irrationality and uninformed and ill considered decision making. With smaller organizations and actual business competition they would be held to account by their competitors or just by running out of money before something catastrophic for the greater economy happened.

Don’t they call all their LLM models Gemini? The paper indicates that they specifically used all the AI models to come up with this figure when they describe the methodology. It looks like they even include classification and search models in this estimate.

I’m inclined to believe that they are issuing a misleading figure here, myself.

I find myself yelling at AWS pretty often, does that make me old?

This statement is not excusing the advertising practices, just that advertising their product has likely had a positive effect on the returns from the film.

They are calling out the tactics as “in-your-face”. This is hardly an endorsement.

The importance of the system in question is not a factor in whether something is a security bug for a dependency. The threat model of the important system should preclude it from using dependencies that are not developed with a similar security paradigm. Libxml2 simplly operates under a different regime than, as an arbitrary example, the nuclear infrastructure of a country.

The library isn't a worm, it does not find its way into anything. If the bank cares about security they will write their own, use a library that has been audited for such issues, sponsor the development, or use the software provided as is.

You may rejoin with the fact that it could find its way into a project as a dependency of something else. The same arguments apply at any level.

If those systems crash because they balanced their entire business on code written by randos who contribute to an open source project then the organizations in question will have to deal with the consequences. If they want better, they can do what everyone is entitled to: they can contribute to, make, or pay for something better.

They pay their lawyers and whoever made this page a lot for the express purpose of credibly arguing that it is very clearly totally legal and very cool to use of any IP they want to train their models.

Could you with a straight face argue that the NYT newspaper could be a surrogate girlfriend for you like a GPT can be? They maintain that it is obviously a transformative use and therefore not an infringement of copyright. You and I may disagree with this assertion, but you can see how they could see this as baseless, ridiculous, and frivolous when their livelihoods depend on that being the case.

The context of the scenario, the meme if you will, is that there is no fire. You're just shouting it for the fun of it, to see the crush of panicked bodies running just because you willed it. That is why it was used as an example of speech that is harmful.

Check out https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shouting_fire_in_a_crowded_the...

As you get older, or if you get injured or disfigured, what happens? Does your "face card" get declined?

It's probably been done.

Interestingly, the procedure involves bringing a device capable of colliding larger lead particles at lower velocities in the vicinity of someone with BTC. The actual collision is superfluous, and can sometimes be counterproductive.

These are all activities he is engaging in to generate money through the company he has a stake in. None of those activities have a purpose other than selling the work of his company and presenting it as a good investment which is how he gets money.

Maybe he wants to use the money in some nebulous future way, subjugating all people in a way that deals with his childhood trauma or whatever. That’s also something rich people do when they need a hobby aside from gathering more money. It’s not their main goal, except when they run into setbacks.

People are not complicated when they are money hoarders. They might have had hidden depths once, but they are thin furrows in the ground next to the giant piles of money that define them now.

Why would we need to be more creative? The explanation of him wanting more money is perfectly adequate.

Being rich results in a kind of limitation of scope for ambition. To the sufferer, a person who has everything they could want, there is no other objective worth having. They become eccentric and they pursue more money.

We should have enrichment facilities for these people where they play incremental games and don’t ruin the world like the paperclip maximizers they are.

You know, I hadn't really considered that.

I do find the text streaming aspect of LLM interfaces to be a charming solution to the latency issue. What's old is new again.

I did something like this myself a little while back, knownothing.dev

It’s fun to put together nonstandard interfaces. I had the idea of streaming in text like you were connected by an old modem to a remote system. Never experienced it myself, as I am not old enough, but I found the idea aesthetically pleasing.

What earphones did the author end up using?

It is strange that after relating all the dead ends in some detail and found his solution, he does not share it.

While they didn't have trains, the Napoleanic wars did feature the first use of canned food to aid in logistical supply of armies. You could argue that the lack of trains (and can openers) probably meant that they jumped the gun on starting giant wars. We Americans fixed that in the Civil War, to great and deadly effect.

Why bother? You’ve already made the most significant changes in your life by cutting down your reliance on animal agriculture to a quarter cup of milk and some whey.

If it’s for some kind of ideological purity thing, it’s probably not worth it.

But if you must… oat milk for coffee is my preference, and pea protein for whey.

Only works if you isolate the strain.

Once they discover what the causative agent is for disease X, they will name it something that someone will call racist eventually and we'll be able to reference it directly.

That was it, yes. Long term storage under refrigeration is harming the quality of the apples at market in the interest of making the apple available year round.

The actionable information is in the beginning: honey crisp apples are not worth it anymore buy whatever instead. For me this keeps it from being insufferable. The stuff in the middle demonstrates what the conditions were like before it went mass market, which supports the conclusion that something changed and that it was likely related to the logistics of growing and distributing the apple.

If you don't like reading these articles, you could try using an LLM to extract a summary before choosing to dive in. I'm sure there are browser extensions for that.