HN user

shsachdev

875 karma

www.careerfair.io

everything is prep for the big show

Posts130
Comments37
View on HN
shikharsachdev.substack.com 1mo ago

I Hate Personal CRMs. I Might Need One

shsachdev
2pts0
shikharsachdev.com 2mo ago

The emotional slot machine of being a sports fan

shsachdev
2pts0
thehustle.co 7mo ago

AI is coming for the world of competitive Excel

shsachdev
1pts0
thehustle.co 1y ago

Adult sport leagues are taking over your city

shsachdev
2pts0
thehustle.co 1y ago

I analyzed 30 years of airline safety videos

shsachdev
1pts1
thehustle.co 1y ago

The entrepreneurs who took Hollywood's favorite surgery mainstream

shsachdev
2pts0
www.pbs.org 1y ago

The Secret Lives of Ants

shsachdev
4pts0
thehustle.co 1y ago

The thriving business of looking good on Zoom

shsachdev
2pts0
www.technologyreview.com 1y ago

The UK is done with coal. How's the rest of the world doing?

shsachdev
4pts1
www.uclahealth.org 1y ago

'Zoom face' phenomenon has people eyeing plastic surgery

shsachdev
1pts2
www.careerfair.io 2y ago

The business of takehome assessments

shsachdev
37pts60
www.livescience.com 2y ago

What is the smallest animal on Earth?

shsachdev
2pts0
notes.mtb.xyz 2y ago

Dangerous Language in Startups

shsachdev
2pts0
scopeblog.stanford.edu 2y ago

What happens to our memory as we age?

shsachdev
14pts7
www.atlasobscura.com 2y ago

The Indian Village That Revolves Around Gulab Jamuns

shsachdev
2pts0
www.livescience.com 2y ago

When did humans start wearing clothes?

shsachdev
2pts0
www.alfiekohn.org 2y ago

The Case Against Homework

shsachdev
56pts115
www.technologyreview.com 2y ago

A plan to bring down drug prices could threaten America's technology boom

shsachdev
2pts1
www.careerfair.io 2y ago

I wrote a 3k word guide to writing a killer cover letter

shsachdev
1pts0
www.joinprospect.com 2y ago

What stage startup offers the best risk-reward tradeoff?

shsachdev
2pts3
english.elpais.com 2y ago

The Taboo of Animal Friendship

shsachdev
4pts0
cdn.porchlightbooks.com 2y ago

The Micropreneur Manifesto [pdf]

shsachdev
1pts0
english.elpais.com 2y ago

Phones are distracting students in class

shsachdev
1pts0
www.careerfair.io 2y ago

I Ran a Background Check on a Startup

shsachdev
49pts16
sketchplanations.com 2y ago

Ask the Question

shsachdev
1pts0
english.elpais.com 2y ago

Is a brain-dead person dead?

shsachdev
4pts1
www.nateliason.com 2y ago

How to Start a Blog That Changes Your Life

shsachdev
2pts0
simonowens.substack.com 2y ago

The Creator Economy "middle class" does exist

shsachdev
3pts0
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 2y ago

Reading fiction: the benefits are numerous

shsachdev
2pts0
www.livescience.com 2y ago

When did humans start burying their dead?

shsachdev
13pts2

I don’t know whether it would be legal, but I 100% agree with your suggestion - a more active form of learning would be more effective. Professor Molesworth (the expert I interviewed for the article) actually suggested that airlines should make passengers count how many seats away from the emergency exit they’re sitting - again, making that a more active process.

There’s also the argument that to improve retention, the regulatory body should decrease the amount of “key safety messages” that need to be included in the videos (which ends up being around 35-45). If you decrease that number, retention of the info you do mention should go up.

Good question. I asked myself the same thing. Since airlines are mandated to produce a safety video regardless, the ROI they really have to assess is against that incremental spend on making the video cinematic/entertaining. And if you factor in that potential to go viral and get good PR from it, as well as the fact that they can produce a video once and reuse possibly for X years, the incremental investment doesn’t sound that unappealing. Also: traditional methods of advertising (say renting a billboard) are just as expensive, if not more.

unironically i can see an interesting biz model, pay $200 and get:

- financial report: does it make sense to join now, at this valuation? how much stock should you ask for? what's the market growth looking like? - reference check past employees who worked there - glassdoor review analysis (fake reviews? helpful reviews?) - past layoffs? - legal side / open lawsuits?

great point! I don't think your average candidate would do this, but I guess this was an exercise in formulating what such a check could look like. it's overkill for sure, but I do think that accessing this type of info can be valuable.

though i'd say the questions I brainstormed in the bullets are the type candidates should definitely be asking during their interview process

Full disclosure: I did this as an experiment for an article (https://www.careerfair.io/online-maze) and as such my motivation to keep applying was driven by the piece of content I was creating. In addition, a lot of the time I wouldn't actually press the "submit" button - I would just stop my timer. Again, my goal was to create a cool, accurate piece of content that could spark interesting discussion, which did end up happening (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37753292).

As others have pointed out, growing any sort of two sided marketplace (in this case with companies and applicants) is really, really hard. On top of that, the quality of the reviews itself is very hard to regulate because Glassdoor isn't necessarily incentivized to promote the "truth" - they make money from the companies on their platform, not the applicants.

See related discussion recently: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36634529

Great post George. I find that the school environment we're brought up in really (or at least for me) shapes our brain to view risks as bad things -- we're taught to get the answer right on the first try. But the real world is a completely different model where you have however many shots on goal and you only need one to really land. And each one is one you can learn from, thereby hopefully improving your odds the next time.

I like this post on the topic too: https://stopa.io/post/228

Downtown SF (and especially OP's neighborhood of 7th/8th Mission Street) is not the place to be. It's a bit like complaining about LA and living right near downtown.

Upper Market, North Beach, Hayes Valley, Valencia St, Mission Dolores, Polk Street, Upper Nob Hill, Haight Ashbury -- all fun locations.

I've lived near Dolores Park for the past 15 months now and have had a great experience. I've found community, made new friends, and have never felt unsafe whilst walking around at night.

We don't have highrise buildings or a thriving "downtown" like other urban cities, but we do have plenty of lively, energetic neighborhoods around the city and the best food & weather in the country.

I agree with the author that changes need to be made and that the homelessness problem is bad. But I think you can still have an overwhelmingly positive experience in the city if you pick one of the neighborhoods I mentioned above to live in.

Hey there thanks for sharing. I wrote the original Reddit post - quick TLDR of what I found:

- A prominent Y-Combinator backed startup, in addition to other companies, is buying fake Glassdoor reviews.

- Companies pay between $10-$35 to get a fake review written by freelancers.

- Companies pay between $100-$1000 to get a negative review taken down. Most of these payments are tied to Contingency Agreements (only pay if review is taken down).

- One of the top companies in Glassdoor’s Best Places To Work 2023 rankings seems to have artificially inflated its reviews right before the October deadline last year.

Full article is here: https://www.careerfair.io/company-reviews