they need to make it required for everyone, and then they'll have done something
HN user
selckin
if i had to guess: people are afraid to use new tools and the initial reduction in productivity and don't know what the acceptable $ usage is limiting their growth/self-education and exploration of an entire new way of working.
basically its a green light to use all the time and resources they want to explore and learn
i create 4 fixed workspaces per monitor in the config, and use it that way
Can someone translate
"Applications and services that parse untrusted CMS or PKCS#7 content using AEAD ciphers (e.g., S/MIME AuthEnvelopedData with AES-GCM) are vulnerable"
to human?
This Apple policy is the only thing stopping chrome from having a full monopoly, and we should be careful trying to remove it
You can view the image here: https://archive.is/IfEFc
you're describing proprietary software with a full support contract.
the point of free software(tm) is gaining benefit from cooperation and community, and nobody is obligated to do anything.
In the actions overview, just the spinner icon (svg w/ css animation) takes 25-40% cpu and 10% gpu in my chrome. Enough to keep my fingers very warm on the laptop
well can't create an instance without having quota available
and low quota is low, like 10 cpu, so start a 2 node k8s cluster with 8cpu each? nope, go request quota increase
no, they have very low quotas by default, and you have to request increases through the portal, which then get rejected and you click the button to contact support/email and then you sometimes have to negotiate with them
you have to do this for every single instance type they have, can't even experiment or test other instance types cause its too much trouble to get quota
Or that then gives people the motivation to work on gcc, have to solve the chicken-egg
"The broader security issue being addressed is Intel SA-00532 that could lead to a denial of service by authenticated users due to insufficient control flow management"
What's an authenticated user in CPU context?
it's a workaround for a lacking type system
on tv at least, they say that apology is the same as admitting guilt, so they might not want to do that for legal reason
anyone know if that applies to the real world?
same, couldn't get past the captcha (chrome)
and if you pick for them not to email you, they try to trick you with dark pattern (all trust gone)
what a world, where you can proudly announce you tricked million of people into sharing their private information without any consequences
EDIT: i should believe where he said he didn't do it, not whee he said he did it
Why is this never framed as a universal right for food, housing, medical care.
Feel like that has a much bigger chance of going somewhere
Does it affect listening to music? Does it also trigger the impatience?
bit out of the box, but you could probably be successful with twitch.tv, getting them on there take some extra time tho
currently my nas can't create partitions for my new 16TB disks
Well stopping bots from buying tickets and vpns so they can resell them at insane prices is exactly why events need AXS type stuff, and then they abuse that for their own anti-consumer actions
There are a lot of daily activities that don't require your full attention
- commuting (driving, bicycle, public transport)
- getting ready for work (shower, getting dressed)
- cooking, eating
- laundry, dishes, vacuuming, ...
- shopping
- gardening
- exercise/working out
- ...My main issue is the keybinds, like before when you archived from the inbox it would go to the next one, or you could use 'j', 'k' to go the next one and it would open, now it does nothing after the next mail doesn't open when archiving
this makes going through the inbox in the morning very frustrating
Or that the basic building blocks/foundations are just terrible
This could reference the video feed, was before 1&2 landed?
Didn't figure out you can click more then the blue words until I read comments here
Indeed, and it's in their right to stop offering that when the period you payed for ends.
Its understandable from their point of view to offer unlimited and be awesome but not expect this kind of usage that is not sustainable. So they made a mistake and are correcting it.
It's hard to see it as a deliberate strategy to pull in users and then charge them more when they are "locked in"