HN user

scubakid

1,914 karma

Kyle Nolan

email: kyle@projectionlab.com

twitter: @_knolan

Posts28
Comments484
View on HN
projectionlab.com 2mo ago

Show HN: I made a simulator for personal finance (5 year update)

scubakid
7pts5
projectionlab.com 2mo ago

Show HN: I spent 5 years building a financial planning and optimization tool

scubakid
1pts0
www.nature.com 2mo ago

Habitual coffee intake shapes the microbiome, modifies physiology and cognition

scubakid
276pts273
thenewstack.io 5mo ago

VS Code becomes multi-agent command center for developers

scubakid
2pts0
nautil.us 8mo ago

The Secret Superpowers of Frog Skin

scubakid
3pts0
ofdollarsanddata.com 9mo ago

The Millionaire's Dilemma

scubakid
1pts1
www.youtube.com 9mo ago

Gemini Robotics 1.5

scubakid
4pts0
oceana.org 10mo ago

The Philippines Protects One of the Planet's Most Biodiverse Marine Regions

scubakid
1pts0
projectionlab.com 1y ago

$1M ARR with zero funding: my bootstrapping story

scubakid
2pts0
oceana.org 1y ago

China Dominates 44% of Visible Fishing Activity Worldwide

scubakid
144pts100
nautil.us 1y ago

AI Knows Us Too Well

scubakid
2pts0
projectionlab.com 1y ago

Show HN: I spent 4 years bootstrapping a financial planning tool to 30k MAUs

scubakid
65pts18
theconversation.com 1y ago

Warming oceans are changing marine habitats

scubakid
5pts1
news.tonydinh.com 1y ago

Get SoC 2 certified as an indie hacker

scubakid
1pts0
electrek.co 1y ago

Candela's hydrofoil electric speedboats set new record with international voyage

scubakid
20pts4
news.ycombinator.com 2y ago

Tell HN: How you changed my life trajectory

scubakid
270pts55
projectionlab.com 2y ago

Show HN: I spent 2 years building a personal finance simulator

scubakid
766pts288
www.indiehackers.com 3y ago

My experience launching on Product Hunt

scubakid
3pts0
projectionlab.com 4y ago

Show HN: I built a simulator for personal finance

scubakid
463pts234
oceans.nautil.us 4y ago

When Evolution Is Infectious

scubakid
1pts0
act.oceana.org 4y ago

There are only ~330 right whales left

scubakid
24pts2
projectifi.io 5y ago

Show HN: I made a simulator for personal finance and financial independence

scubakid
294pts164
usa.oceana.org 5y ago

Florida Manatees Falling Prey to Plastics

scubakid
2pts0
www.theatlantic.com 5y ago

Big Bait Worm Knows It Has a Problem

scubakid
3pts0
oceans.nautil.us 5y ago

Squid Transmute Illumination into Intention

scubakid
2pts0
arstechnica.com 5y ago

It began as an AI-fueled dungeon game. Then it got much darker

scubakid
1pts0
projectifi.io 5y ago

Show HN: I made a simulator for personal finance

scubakid
479pts255
projectifi.io 5y ago

Show HN: ProjectiFi – Personal finance simulator with no link to your accounts

scubakid
9pts5

here's a writeup I shared that might be of interest[0]

it's mainly been product-led growth. I've always just been a guy that likes building cool things, and I spent most of the early years head-down coding. anything marketing-oriented was new to me, and not my natural skillset.

gradually PL started getting some attention in the FI / FIRE space, and recently I've begun building out a small team while staying bootstrapped.

https://projectionlab.com/blog/we-reached-1m-arr-with-zero-f...

To me, "what is it like to be a" is more or less the intersection of sensory modalities between two systems... but I'm not sure the extent of the overlap tells you much about whether a given system is "conscious" or not.

GPT-5 12 months ago

You know, I used to bullseye T16s in my womp rat back home, they're not much bigger than thermal exhaust ports.

I think there's a certain type of engineer that actively prefers working in a small team where you can make an outsized impact and wear many hats. I'm one of them lol.

I wonder if you could bring on just one really good dev who matches that description vs scaling up to a larger team. In many cases, a very small team of A+ players can beat a large team of B players.

Although it sounds like you're saying marketing/distribution may have played a larger role in your trajectory? In hindsight, do you think focusing your team-building efforts on the marketing side would have been a better strategy?

We've done some pricing experimentation over the years, and it's possible we're actually still positioned too cheap right now for the value the platform provides.

Personal finance is a pretty broad space, and it's common for different people to come to this with varying desires and expectations.

In our experience, the people who see the value in a good long-term DIY financial plan view our current pricing as extremely affordable, especially compared to traditional financial planning services which often charge $3-5k for a PDF and a pat on the back.

Anyway, if automated tracking is the piece that's most important to you, it might be worth noting that we do plan to add more options for that. But that work -- and all the other controversial implications of it that I mentioned in another comment -- just needs to be prioritized against all the other highly requested things on the product roadmap, based on what the community really wants the most.

Yep, I wrote the post!

I'd say we reached PMF a couple years ago the way I define it (solid customer acquisition from organic sources & word-of-mouth, strong retention, sustainable growth).

I was just curious if others might look at it differently, since I know definitions can vary. And like you said, some people might look at this update and dismiss it as still really small-time.

I noticed most tools neglect international scenarios because the US market is big and it's easier to focus on that. So I decided to be different and try to build with as much international flexibility as possible. We have a bunch of international account types and tax preseta, including some for the UK.

GPT is not bad at high-level guesstimates, but there's a LOT that goes on under the hood to make a detailed, accurate, responsive, and tax-aware long-term planning system with a good UX for nuanced scenario comparisons and what-ifs. At current capability levels, AI tools aren't a great replacement for that in my experience. But we'll see if that changes as they continue to evolve...

one of the nice things about being lean and bootstrapped is there's less pressure to chase the mass market.

so we need to worry less than a venture-backed company probably would about just how far outside of the FIRE community this has a lot of appeal.

that being said, there are certainly a lot of people who would benefit from having a long-term financial plan. here's to hoping your ynab comparison turns out to be apt!

thanks! consistently putting in those hours wasn't easy. it became the only time in life I've had elevated blood pressure. but you're right that I probably wouldn't have gotten here without burning the candle at both ends like that.

at the time, I was too risk-averse to go all-in right away, and this was the best de-risking strategy I came up with. luckily, my schedule is now more balanced again. (a little lol)

sounds like that would also mean overhauling the data model to track individual positions within every account, not just balances?

and then folks would expect every account's asset allocation to be automatically derived from those positions too I imagine? that would differ a lot from how asset allocation modeling and change over time currently works in the tool.

maybe I'm missing something, but it feels like there could be a lot of complexity here that would need to be carefully weighed against the product vision and other things on the roadmap.

There are many frameworks and approaches, but here are two of my filtering criteria:

1. I don't start a project unless it's something I deeply want to exist for my own personal use. That way I know there's at least one person who would pay for an elegant solution. And even if no one shows up, at least it's useful to me.

2. I don't start a project unless I can envision the solution top to bottom and feel confident about the scope of the technical work. I'm not the most brilliant person at data structures & algorithms, and I prefer solutions where a simple architecture can get the job done. If there are foggy areas in the technical design, or parts I struggle to visualize clearly, to me that's a red flag.

Are your existing customers vocal about what they love or wish you'd add? Do you know how they found you and what made them choose you over competitors? Is there a niche/segment within your larger TAM with a specific pain point you're solving really well? And how big is that segment?

Either way, if your existing customers don't all come from paid channels, and they're loyal, and you've outlasted multiple competitors, that already sounds like a real achievement to me. My progress was slow for years before things started to really pick up, so don't discount signs of traction if there are some meaningful ones.

I was definitely fortunate to attempt this in a compatible stage of life (no kids yet).

I'd like to think there will still be room for craft/creation if I become a parent someday. But I doubt this level of sustained focus (obsession?) over multiple years would have been possible or responsible in that scenario.