sanp

Could you clarify what you mean by “…will be over in a year or so”. Genuine question. Is it that models will be so good that none of this matters or we will need to go back to older ways?

Hasn’t this always been the case? I have always run builds under WSL2 in Windows because of this.

The doctors would be putting more than their jobs on the line.

Is the author accounting for the equity built up? Cash has to go out whether it’s a mortgage or rent. With a mortgage you are building equity. This changes the true math when you sell (leaving aside your ability to now get a HELOC).

So, better than people?

AI will fix this

Really? The VC ecosystem and most of tech leadership is pretty alt to hard right now.

Question - isn't P(Hitting | Human Driving) still less than P(Hitting | Tesla FSD) in this particular case [given that if this particular situation comes up - Tesla will fail always whereas some / many humans would not]?

Well that assumes that there are more suppliers available (within the time period under consideration). Over what time period do we assume that more suppliers will be drawn out? An hour? A day? A month?

Isn’t the underlying assumption here that supply is essentially infinite (or at least comparable to demand)? I think is the underlying assumption with any such statement. If the assumption doesn’t hold true then I am not sure the statement holds true (perhaps only till there is some supply).

This is a case of China trying to reduce pollution. Reduce aerosol emissions. The impact of this is lower cooling (aerosol interaction results in atmospheric cooling)

What’s a multi-turn prompt?

He has bankrupted a few casinos. So, he is pretty good at poker.

Do you have evidence for NC disaster services being worse than CA disaster services (as provided by the Federal government)?

We wouldn’t know this if the information isn’t shared? So, aren’t you making a case for not removing this information?

GDP PPP is based on assumptions that - 1) People indifferent countries have the same basket of goods - probably not true for someone living in US vs Chine vs India 2) Accurate pricing data is available (which is not true for big categories like real estate in India and China - a large part of the price is under the table and unaccounted)

All this handwringing about inflation, economy etc. I think it is lot simpler:

Most people are already set on who they will vote for. Perhaps Trump supporters more so than Democrats. So, it all boils down to turnout:

1. Kamala wasn't the candidate to bring out Democrats (no primary, not a popular choice even among Democrats, selected by the DNC)

2. Trump can bring out his voters. The added advantage was a female opponent. A number of his supporter (male and female) have a pretty strong misogynistic streak. They will turn out to vote against a female opponent just because of that. I suspect a male Democratic candidate (even Biden) would have done much better (entirely driven by lower turnout of Trump supporters as they would not have been so committed against a male opponent)

This is further supported by the results of 2018 /2022 mid-terms. Trump was not on the ballot. So, Republican turnout (especially the kind that is in the cult) was impacted and Democrats had a good showing. We will see the same in 2026 (even more so as the economy will tank over the next 2 years and Democrats will come out in force). I predict a clean sweep by Democrats in 2026 perhaps even 60 Senate seats (yes, the economy will be that bad) and then the impeachment will start.

This will go away once Trump wins

Is it on Product Hunt?

I think in 4-5 years’ time there will be huge demand for fixing / maintaining these LLM-built apps. Perhaps the LLMs that follow can do it.

All these Libertarians asking for government handouts…

I have had a great experience with Ioniq 5 and the real world range is better than Model Y (similar price point model).

And how many VCs heavily invested in Crypto startups?

I think UBI without regulations on pricing will result in inflation that will negate the benefits of UBI.

Regulating prices will have unintended consequences (outside of a specific set of goods).

Perhaps the Govt needs to take over the provisioning of these basics (production and distribution) and anything outside the basics will be market driven.

I know this has been tried in the past and has failed miserably. But, we now have better ways to track these things. So, maybe time to give it another try?

The problem is rent will go up when everyone can afford that extra 1000. Unless you build more housing UBI will just inflate housing costs

Sure. But this still has to be decided by a court of law - did the defendant follow all the regulations? That is what most of these cases come down to anyway - did the defendant do a reasonable job of following established norms (and regulations) to prevent harm? Are we saying that the courts should not decide this and it should be left to the government to just certify and that should be sufficient to throw the plaintiff’s cases out in all scenarios?

Maybe I will finally get my Pi 4.

Yes, Reagan the fiscal conservative who tripled the deficit and national debt:

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/commandingheights/shared/minitext/e...

Perhaps a Cost of Thriving Index? https://manhattan.institute/article/the-cost-of-thriving-ind...

Agree but then the same argument applies to RDBMSs and multiple vendors seem to be doing OK in that space. I think it ultimately comes down to "stuff" (sales journey, price, support etc.) other than the technology itself. I am sure any RDBMS can meet most of the requirements of any given customers (in most cases) but we still see customers buying across vendors.