saidnooneever

forward deployed engineers are already there for a while. i wouldnt say many years but maybe in less formal ways they did it before. often enough theres a few folks doing stuff before roles/department emerges.

it has 20 years experience us claude code no worries

if they dont allow it ASML will move away and they have nothing.

how do u expect Anne to claim copyright -_-. this is how it works, copyright. people have it and then make claims...

it wont be stopped and it wont be pretty. AI in warzones and to target populations is here and here to stay.

the first effective use in my mind was turkish drones swarms between azerbijan and armenia. (used ML, not LLMs afaik)

very soon it will be doing the things humans are 'uncomfortable' with. the things that traumatize the humans when they do it. that is what they will replace, and that is exactly not the kind of thing u want to replace. It will make war and killing an effortless and thoughtless game. Today the only problem is to find the people to do the killing, its getting less popular as a job option and mandatory drafts face more resitance. soon that problem is solved by autonomous/unmanned systems driven and directed by AI.

some suits who've never seen a casualty of war or a broken family with missing members will direct them... tyranny will rain down more and more on the common people of the earth. like we see now in gaza and ukraine, but far wider spread.

the (illegal) drone wars have already been done since atleast Obama times, people saw it, pointed at it and it continues. As will War-AI.

Worst of all, it will prevent further learning in this area for humans. It will be less likely humans will learn war is not the way. One side is blinded by their own tools while the other is blinded by fear and suffering.

"Rise and shine mr Freeman... and smell the ashes."

i wonder how they will detect it though. is there some good tool to tell them if code files someone submit were outputs or altered by LLMs?

might also be U shaped memory issue did you try changing the order of your poems to see if it focusses on different ones? maybe it just happened to have those old ones in points it memory was focused at. (ofc its not good but would be an alternative idea to it focussing on IT things/code to produce such results)

you can also use your eyes, hands or other senses :').

reminds me of those jokes?

what is difference between a parot and a human? silence rly? u cant tell the difference between a parot and a human? :')

there is infact RL for LLMs and its unlikely the frontier labs do not use it in some ways

its gui only and i dont think it happen for everyone.i dont see it on my machine, but its good to check. didnt notice anything on cli nor gui, but i started gui only on last 2 versions

it would be at a low enough level to reprogram IOMMU unless a hypervisor will prevent it.

if you have a hypervisor you can prevent the other to do the dma freely in memory because u can use iommu and things like amd-vi to separate it good. but if you dont have the hv below it, any devices with dma can do the duty across entire ram.

some laws are not technically useful but are pushed for other reasons: - satisfy lobbyists / critics in some way - to create awareness around something. some people will act differently in light of such laws despite them not being effective in any technical sense, its a validation of concerns for some

ask any dj who doesnt use modern sync tools and they will tell u, u can follow 2 entire songs out of sync of eachother fine, it takes practice but your brain can get used to these kinda tasks. (ofc very unscientific here :D)

i didnt use em atall for a long time but since recently i use them almost exclusively, they definitely passed my skills for larger projects...

i code by hand for fun, got few tinkering projects. to learn new things i can tell the thing. sometimes i get them from what the models output. play with it by hand to get a feel for it.

i would be very costly to try and build detection systems as models improve. its pretty much impossible.

you need to be able to call them back on your own accord. not by them giving you a number to call or calling the same nr back again

this is normal in a lot of applications before AI

i agreed key phrases. id recommend it. something unrelated to the family and totally arbitrary, agreedupon only verbally. (or write it down for them if they are old and memory is an issue. you can remind them to read your note out loud.. easy).

this way, you do not footgun yourself in the event you'd ever need to ask something. Money isnt the only thing they can ask, and no one (i think) has a glass orb to tell their future and know for certain such a call would never happen. its easy to think it wont happen to you, i think that is most peoples' sentiment until it does. (having a need for help from family that is)

lucky strike is the key here they can do this with VOIP really easily to massive amounts of numbers. its staggering amounts if you look at the traffic really. worst is if they proxy that via residential proxy services which often come from end-user / individuals phones so the traffic is hard to detect for carriers etc. since it looks like a regular VOIP app connection.

they are freely available to anyone, so yes. there might be anti scraping stuff on the site ofc, but this wont stop motivated people. AIbros are pretty motivated.

usually these studies are done across a very narrow sample of Earth's population. often from similar region or country etc. Which dont get me wrong, is a lot of stuff to process for such a study, but the number is statistically insignificant. many more similar studies would need to show identical results.

this one selected about 100k people from a dataset of around 500k. All from one country/region (UK)

furthermore they dont measure sleep but they estimate if someone was maybe asleep based data from an accelerometer. so they cannot measure what sleep state someone acheived or if they were actually really sleep or just u know staring at the ceiling in an existential crisis....

its not a random country. its a country given to some people by the UK after second world war. Its very specifically placed too -_-. Dont think country borders dictate whos in charge of politics....

Not wanting to say they are snakes but you better get it out of your head that Israel is some random small country, to the west atleast.

They created it with very specific intent.

its sad ppl cant run their own servers without companies interfering. Was never an issue on games like CS. sure there was a lot of toxic ones but also rly nice ones. you cant moderate human nature. hiding it does no one any good either.

c2 servers are really simple things. easy to specify completely in 1 prompt and have it slap it out quickly. any model can do this, dont even need to jailbreak them aslong as u dont call it a botnet c2 -_- there are many types of servers that need to support agents afterall -_-

the trick about agentic systems is definitely how to do the prompting. things like automation and sandboxing are trivial in comparisson. if you generally ask via API model directly you can see what basic answers it actually yields and how fine tuning prompts and refinements to output as well as adversarial prompts etc are important to get relatively solid results.

a lot of expertise of certain domains' workflows is needed to make it functional within that domain. some of this can be yielded via prompting too etc so its also baoance of how much to prompt it vs. how much of it you wanna let it reason over itself. (if you tell it too much i lock it into a path and if you tell too little it will give incomplete results )

this quote makes me feel Linus need some sleep.

"... Quite often at that point, when I look at the code, I sometimes find issues."

made me giggle. "half the time, it works 100% of the time!" (ref)

not saying its not moving in the right direction but i feel a lot of these things that are now security defaults are a bit oversold considering a lot of people seem to rely on them being enabled and will just enable them again to the same effect. so theres not really more security.

ofc, better defaults are better theres no argument there. just feel like the whole approach of these tools to allow arbitrary code execution and remote resources by design is the really issue,.not the default settings. (ofc, i have no solution for it too!)

now it will say mhm, and yeah to pretend its listening. Just like a real human -_-.

skipping it too. these things never translate well from books. havent really seen any good scifi novels turned to movies which were then also good movies. (understandably,.you lose a lot of detail).

maybe its just not my medium.

can actually imagine this might end up making enough data (like social media sites do it, not litteral data but metadata / profiling the generally accepted cost for 'free services' to make it generally available, atleast someday.

like people can use youtube and facebook etc. for free too.

ofc its maybe not an idealist thing but looking at how those services work and how people enjoy using them it might not be all that bad (the integrity of people using the data could be better perhaps but this is humans learning to overcome their own shadows. it takes generational learning).

ofc not sure about the sites goals or anything but thats what came to mind thinking about the costs involved and how to expose it for free permanently atleast at some tier