HN user
- Fucked up predatory remittance money shops, and forced them to lower their fees and actually start competing. - Offered a more stable unit of exchange for people in places where fiat was not usable. - Cheaper alternative method for fast, large transactions. Forced big banks that traditionally accommodated these transactions to innovate.
And the fact that it sank on its maiden voyage. The tragic irony makes it obvious why humans bestow such significance upon it.
Yes, exactly what huthuthike said. As I Lay Dying. Sound & Fury is great but a much more challenging read.
Ya McCarthy borrows heavily from Melville and Faulkner, which he readily cops to. Judge Holden and Ahab have a lot in common.
Some of my favorite quotes, from my favorite McCarthy book, Blood Meridian:
War was always here. Before man was, war waited for him. The ultimate trade awaiting its ultimate practitioner.
--
Whatever in creation exists without my knowledge exists without my consent.
--
In the days to come they would ride up through a country where the rocks would cook the flesh from your hand and where other than rock nothing was. They rode in a narrow enfilade along a trail strewn with the dry round turds of goats and they rode with their faces averted from the rock wall and the bake-oven air which it rebated, the slant black shapes of the mounted men stenciled across the stone with a definition austere and implacable like shapes capable of violating their covenant with the flesh that authored them and continuing autonomous across the naked rock without reference to sun or man or god.
--
They rode on and the sun in the east flushed pale streaks of light and then a deeper run of color like blood seeping up in sudden reaches flaring planewise and where the earth drained up into the sky at the edge of creation the top of the sun rose out of nothing like the head of a great red phallus until it cleared the unseen rim and sat squat and pulsing and malevolent behind them. The shadows of the smallest stones lay like pencil lines across the sand and the shapes of the men and their mounts advanced elongate before them like strands of the night from which they’d ridden, like tentacles to bind them to the darkness yet to come.
Many have already pointed that there have been studies to measure the accuracy of sleep analysis by wearables. They aren't that great. If you have a concern, you should definitely seek out a polysomnograph, and wearables should not be a replacement for that. However, you can't get a polysomnograph every night, and wearables are probably the best option for regular analysis. Just because they're not that great doesn't mean they're useless, and doesn't mean they won't improve.
Purely anecdotal but I know way more TVs with an Apple TV device than I know humans with an Apple watch. In most cases they are households with many TV-Apple TV pairings, and maybe one or two people in the household have an Apple watch.
Yup. Federal law enforcement uses interstate nexus via server locations to establish jurisdiction.
I don't see familiarity being with the touchscreen buttons being the issue. The issue is that actually touching a certain amount of pixels on a disembodied screen, while driving, while the car is in motion, is actually annoyingly difficult. No matter how attuned you are with them. I owned a Tesla for several years, and it never got better. It distracts the driver considerably. Unless they drastically increased the size of the interaction points on the screen and/or improved the gestures used to interact, I just don't see touchscreens being a good primary point of interaction between the driver and the car (at least until the driver really isn't regularly "driving" anymore).
Brave | do not use | This term perpetuates the stereotype of the "noble courageous savage," equating the Indigenous male as being less than a man.
Should we get rid of bravo then as well? I assume people making these lists have good intentions, but efforts like this really get lost in the sauce. They are effectively parodying themselves.
Tangentially related, Russ Roberts of econtalk had a good interview a few years ago with the founder of a free market hospital in Oklahoma. Super interesting.
https://www.econtalk.org/keith-smith-on-free-market-health-c...
I have been under the good faith assumption that most (though definitely not all) of the employees that have departed Twitter were probably necessary and valuable to the company. I left the article with the same impression as you. This single person did this very important job, seemingly well, and didn't appear to be drowning in the work. What were the other 8-9k doing?
No, I think the article makes it very clear what the value and function of SRE is. The point of the comment you're responding to is that the author was the only one doing this—not a team of ten, not even a team of two. This is Twitter's whole cache system! Probably the most important part of their hardware stack, in terms of "is the site performing well for users". There are other SRE needs at Twitter, but not that that many. What were the other 9k people at the company? It begs the question.
Your source is a Texas-secessionist rant with no citations? Do you have any actual objective reviews of why the power grid issue happened?
I'd guess that turns aren't a big deal. Commercial flights rarely turn above 10k feet, so really just some risk of airsickness briefly at either end of the flight. Wing flex during turbulence seems like it would be a far bigger concern for passengers at the ends. That would not be a fun ride, but maybe these crafts handle chop differently? I'd imagine the flex is more evenly distributed, but still problematic.
OP's idea is that the FTC punted this at the direction of an elected official who gets campaign donations from tech companies. It does not follow that because the FTC has a revolving door problem (which it definitely does), there was executive pressure to punt. Furthermore, FTC officials tend to work at corporations primarily because they are among the most knowledgeable and well-connected people in the space, not necessarily because there is some kind of slow-acting quid pro quo here. It's still a problem, but it's not really analogous to the idea OP had.
Unlikely. High ranking government lawyers usually don't just put on cases to appease the donors of the executive. These are high-achieving, career-driven people. They want to win.
You swore Tile off because because you don't like how batteries generally function?
Perhaps other MSM publications. The specific article here talks about US accidents in high-standards labs, and posits that those same accidents can happen in other countries. It's not attacking China at all. What you're describing doesn't apply to the discussion in this article or this thread, just seems non-productive.
Ya, this is really it. I bought a Model 3 about 6 months ago. I spent about 3 months researching, test-driving, talking with dealerships. I had zero interest in a Tesla when I started, but I begrudgingly bought one because it was so far ahead of every other car I tried—even ones that were higher price points.
And if anyone decides to read this, please make sure you read In The First Circle, not The First Circle. The latter is the "first" publication, which Solzhenitsyn abridged and modified, because he did not think that the true work would make it past the Soviet minders. In The First Circle is the true work, as Solzhenitsyn intended.
The law requires brokerages to assess clients knowledge and fitness to trade more advanced instruments like spreads and naked options. This individual most likely lied to the brokerage about his trading experience, and that's why he was approved for Level 3+. There are many warnings issued when you start in futures and options, to make users aware of the risks of trading without sufficient experience and education. The cost of equal access to financial instruments (imo, a good thing) is that the balance between KYC, education, and risky behavior is hard to strike. This is an example of those costs coming due. I don't really think the marketers are to blame.
Half of their models start at $80k+ USD. Sure seems like a luxury brand.
Which continent is the one where no one speaks english?
This is a pretty absolutist approach.
What's the need?
How about plain old abuse? People using services to break the law, particularly crimes with victims? Safety risks?
- An uber passenger sees their driver has a gun in the cup holder; they report it to uber.
- A Square merchant is using Square to launder serious money and Square catches it.
- A Dropbox user is uploading child pornography that indicates active child abuse.
In these situations, you think the company should consult the user first before they take a look at PII? Or ask a senior manager? The former is laughable, and the latter is not scalable. Senior manager clearance might work at a small or even midsize company, but for a large tech company abuse happens thousands of times a day. Review must be operationalized.
I would love to see a law that could strike the right balance, but I don't see how it's possible. Accommodating both small and large companies would be very challenging If you mandate the kind of structure that big companies would need, it could cripple smaller companies operational budgets. If you mandate the rules suited for small companies, it fetters large companies at scale. And then how would you enforce it? Another regulatory agency with audit authority?
This kind of regulation is better served by the market, imo, and we've seen that with Uber. In regions where Lyft is a viable option, it has seen significant business increase in the wake of Uber's many scandals. The key is sunlight, which is usually cast by 1. journalists 2. whistleblowers 3. EFF and other watchdogs.
it fails the stable store of value test
...when compared to a handful of fiat currencies, maybe. It's not fair to gatekeep with top performers, in my opinion.
There are many national currencies that lack stability. That doesn't make them "not currencies". It just makes them volatile currencies.
In fact, that's precisely why Bitcoin has become so popular in those countries—particularly Latin America; Bitcoin may not be stable, but it's a more reliable store of value (for now) than the bolivar or Argentinian peso.
At least until after a few 10ks
Yup, vertical mouse solves most of my right-side issues. It can't be one of those cool-looking vertical mouses either (e.g. Anker, Evoluent). While those do help, it's not enough for me. I get the most relief from an actual joystick vertical mouse.
Good to know.
And ya, a security question to bypass a phone 2SV is a joke. Almost entirely defeats the purpose.
Is 17 days an acceptable TAT here? I know investigation and fixes can be a challenge, but with the severity of this exploit+PayPal being a serious financial service, I kind of would hope for a faster fix. Maybe I'm off base...I really don't know; curious what others think.
How much time would've had to pass (without PayPal doing anything) before the author is ethically obligated to post to HN/media/etc about the hack? I believe publicizing an (unpatched) exploit like this crosses into criminality, but it would be essential to demonstrate some kind of proof, for credence and gravity. I'm guessing the community has some standardized guidelines for this sort of thing, but I'm not aware of them.