HN user

rubymamis

972 karma

Ruby Mamistvalove

Daino Notes: get-notes.com

Vox: get-vox.com

Personal site: https://rubymamistvalove.com

Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/mamistvalove

GitHub: https://github.com/nuttyartist

Email: ruby.mamistvalove (AT) gmail (DOT) com

Posts9
Comments575
View on HN
Will It Mythos? 30 days ago

Fable was the only model that was able to detect a data corruption bug in my Qt C++ note-taking app[1] that all other tested models (gpt-5.5 xhigh, GLM-5.1, Kimi 2.7, DeepSeek V4 Pro) didn't find. I'll test on GLM-5.2 and Mimo v2.5 Pro soon.

[1] https://www.get-notes.com

It's SwiftUI that is at fault here[1][2], not native apps in general. I wrote my native app in Qt C++ and QML and showed that it is *significantly* faster and uses significantly less RAM than similar web apps[3]. So, no, web apps, in general, are slower and uses more resources than well-engineered native apps.

[1] https://notes.alinpanaitiu.com/SwiftUI%20is%20convenient,%20...

[2] https://x.com/daniel_nguyenx/status/1734495508746702936

[3] https://rubymamistvalove.com/block-editor#8-performance

Yep, this is a difficult problem. I wrote extensively how I managed to solve this by creating my block editor from scratch using Qt C++ and QML[1]. I faced similar issues - selection between discrete blocks, showing the underlying Markdown under the cursor, varying delegate sizes, etc.

I'm using what I learned to create a native LLM client with a streaming Markdown parser[2].

[1] https://rubymamistvalove.com/block-editor

[2] https://www.get-vox.com

That's not the solution - developers or businesses are squeezed into signing up anyway to survive/make a profit. The only viable alternative is to create an alternative - Linux phones.

Swift 6.3 4 months ago

I'm glad Chris Lattner moved on and founded Mojo. It's such a cool language with ton of potential.

This is wrong. There's a misconception that you can't statically link your app when using the open-source LGPL version of Qt. From my reading of the LGPL license this doesn't appear to be the case[1]. The LGPL allows you to statically link your app as long as you provide the object files and allow users to relink your app with a different version of Qt.

I've observed many people spreading this misinformation about only being able to dynamically link with the LGPL version of Qt. Please stop this.

[1] https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#LGPLStaticVsDynami...

We need Linux OSes and phones to catch up to really break free from this duopoly. Only when there is enough traction, essential infrastructure like banks will start supporting Oses like that. It's a chicken and egg kind of problem.

The Codex App 6 months ago

This is not because of Qt - it is due to some (most) Qt developers not caring enough. I created my Qt app feel native both on macOS and Windows[1]. It did require a lot of tuning - but those are things I'll reuse across other apps.

[1] https://get-notes.com/