HN user

roddux

754 karma
Posts2
Comments233
View on HN

Rather than seeking an impossible ideal (>2 people who agree on what 'good' code is)-- instead read ALL sorts of code. This will then help you learn to distinguish between what is good and not good, and what makes it so. Simplicity, clarity, and lack of surprise come to mind as concepts for 'good'. Others will have different ideas.

Nobody is arguing that users having a 1-2 week patch window is a bad thing. However, this frankly seems incompatible with open-source projects. Silently patching issues does not work in practice; it frequently leads to missed fixes, misapplied patches and other incompatibility woes. The situation with backports and LTS releases showcases this well— the only truly well-supported kernel is latest. Everything else is a patchwork of best-effort fixes, not all of which may have been applied correctly. Brad Spengler of grsecurity fame talks frequently about this (primarily via Twitter): https://twitter.com/spendergrsec

Is it a rule that all NFT art must be algorithmically generated and look like shit? Jesus wept.

I am quite interested in your setup! Have you written at all about how you use this, day to day, or perhaps made a screencast? I would be very keen to watch it.

I am a huge fan of integrated environments. I often find the promise of extendability in Linux is unfilfilled by components that do not interop without a lot of manual effort.

Looks like an interesting prototype. The problem is, though, is it just a funky UI on top of Webkit/Blink and V8? There's no real innovation under the hood, here - although some of the GUI features look nice.

Is it possible to verify that you cannot access said system, though? How would that even be done? In most scenarios I can imagine you're still rely on the server telling you something about itself... which it can lie about.

The potential application is hinted at with the slide "OSS-Fuzz@Home". Akin to the SETI@Home* mass-distributed computing project, this has the potential to scale in a HUGE way. Anyone with a web browser could simply load the fuzzer and contribute cycles... No need for any big downloads, any installs, special software, configuration or anything! Just visit a page and you're golden.

I wonder if Google will actually build on this. It's a great idea.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SETI@home

Of all places I thought I'd see that channel recommended, HN is close to last on the list. That guy puts up some really great stuff.

I've been following these since maybe 2016? I don't remember when they started. It's striking to note that for as long as I recall, HGST still holds the crown of lowest annualised failure rate across the board.