rmc

(I made WaterwayMap.org) The data is 100% OpenStreetMap, and updated daily. Something missing on WWM.org means something missing on OSM. You can fix that yourself!

(I made WaterwayMap.org) The data is 100% OSM. You edit it to fix it yourself.

(I made WaterwayMap.org)

What's interesting and somewhat amusing is that this map has determined that the section of the Soar that joins with the Trent just north of Loughborough is apparently unnavigable

The boat views only use the OpenStreetMap `boat` tag. If a section of river is missing from WWM.org, then it's likely the tag is missing from the OSM waterway. You can fix that!

(I made WaterwayMap.org) There isn't a legend, because all waterways are treated the same.

(I made WaterwayMap.org) Yeah, it's been very useful to make OSM data better.

some streams are disconnected by other waterbodies where they should not be, as there seems to be little consensus on how to connect waterways through lakes and other waterbodies

Yeah, the OSM community is still discussing this: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/should-river-lines-be-...

(I made WaterwayMap.org) The data is 100% from OpenStreetMap. I only have to deal with 1 dataset. I suspect people have imported data from Massachusetts into OSM, hence why you see the edge. You can edit OSM to connect things up yourself.

(I made WaterwayMap.org) The data is 100% OpenStreetMap. It's possible many rivers are missing the `boat` tag (which that uses). If you add the missing tag, then it'll appear on WWM.org tomorrow!

For bigger rivers that I'm familiar with I was not able to make sense of that number. […] Maybe it's the total length of that waterway and all connected waterways?

Correct.

(I made WaterwayMap.org)

“The "Navigable by canoe" filter seems to filter out everything”

The data is 100% from OpenStreetMap. That map only looks at things with the `canoe` tag in OSM. There are a lot of waterways in OSM which do not have this tag. If you know of missing data, you can just edit OSM and it'll show up on WWM.org tomorrow!

(I made WaterwayMap.org)

Nope, it's 100% OpenStreetMap data.

(I made WaterwayMap.org)

“Who mapped these?” All the data is from OpenStreetMap!

_(I made WaterwayMap.org)_

I made WaterwayMap.org. I wanna make a watershed map too!

Lovely! I'm Irish, we don't have it as much. But I'd love to do a canal boat holiday. Doddleing along the canals, stopping in a lovely english country pub... oh I can dream.

I made WaterwayMap.org, and one of the view is for anything OpenStreetMap considers “boatable”: <https://waterwaymap.org/#tiles=planet-waterway-boatable> I know nothing about this topic, so if there's anything missing, I'm willing to add it.

Hello! I'm the creator of WaterwayMap.org.

The code is here: <https://github.com/amandasaurus/waterwaymap.org/> if you want to file a bug report or feature request. The main code to calculate the network is `osm-lump-ways`: <https://github.com/amandasaurus/osm-lump-ways>

“and Google both use OSM data as well”

Pretty sure Google doesn't use OSM

(I'm the creator). There's a few views which will bring in _named_ streams, the `waterway` & `name` tag views. I tried to calculate it with any waterway tag, which would include unnamed streams, but my computer ran out of memory. Maybe later.

(I'm the creator of this) Yes lots of rivers are missing those sort of connections through lakesᵉᵗᶜ, but that's not unique to USA. Please keep mapping to fix up things.

Hi! I'm the creator of this tool! I'm open to more feedback, and suggestions. Even related views.

Lots of people discovering OSM through this, which is great. This sort of tool is new, so we're all just fixing up lots of little tagging & topology mistakes which were hard to spot.

follow me on fedi/masto for more news: <https://en.osm.town/@amapanda/>

I'm the creator of this. Yes, it's precomputed on a computer, but it only takes ~30 mins to calculate each view. Most of that time is file I/O (which I really need to refactor)

follow me on fedi/masto for more news: <https://en.osm.town/@amapanda/>

Some buildings have ... have building=yes or building=oui

There are 435,057,783 building=yes, and 1 building=oui.

The OSM community has standardized.

https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=yes https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/building=oui

That's awesome

At the same time he’d happy-glad you to death

Can you explain what “happy-glad” means here please?

I think there have been screenshots of group chats where politicians have said something embarassing. This is a case where the politician would have no problem saying “That's a fake”

That's just one (knowledable & influential) person's opinion. “OSM” itself doesn't “have views” on topics as complicated as that.

That sounds like your problem is with Apple, not OSM.

A server capable of hosting a minutely updated global OSM tileserver costs about €100 per month on Hetzner. That's not nothing, but “crazy” it is not.

The tile servers were under massive load, and massively negatively affecting performance. Many people were not happy

That's for the website tiles. If a transit authority is using OSM data, they would download & process it directly themselves, and hence this doesn't apply at all.

Note that the basic router on openstreetmap.org is just a tech demo

Huh? On the OSM.org website you can use Graphhopper or OSRM routing engines. Both are not "tech demos", but proper real routing engines for real world use. They are hosted by volunteers, so you shouldn't rely on them to be free for everyone for ever. If you want to build a business on them, both OSRM & Graphhopper are open source & self hostable

The OSMF is currently working on updated Attribution Guidelines, which should go some way to address some of this, and will probably adopt something within the next month or two.

So the situation is currently fluid.