HN user
With low pitched data center noise does the decibel level tell the whole story? I thought it carried better and penetrated better than the db level would indicate.
It’s my understanding, for the most part, that they do not have constant access to fire arms, that they are somewhat tightly controlled on base precisely because the army has learn widespread indiscriminate access is a safety problem despite all this training.
GPTs were inherently trained on human text. It would not surprise me if mixing all this together by AI touches the people of today with the feelings of today more than a biased singular person.
It is critical to remember that in the red phase, things like module/exports import failures due to trying to import file paths that don't yet exist, exports that don't yet exist, etc. is not valid TDD. For valid TDD, the test cases must actually run.
Is this for llm purposes? In many forms of TDD a compile error is key to the red phase. And you are going from red to green before asserts even exist is part of the process.
Including South America too, yes. I'd not characterize it as the middle, it's mostly centered around the landmasses on most maps.
A war that was very good for what the US economic juggernaut has become. We may be significantly better off maintaining great relationships with our Western Hemisphere countries and let the oceans protect us.
So 1 billion dollars buys about 8 billion gloves? Or about 4 weeks? So for 12 billion dollars that's a years slack?
I am not sure what you are getting at, continuously spending money on cost ineffective gloves just in case there is a problem sometime, including the upfront investment.
The scale of the storage? We have 6000 hospitals in the US. which would have to store about 2 million gloves a piece if you decentralized it. The storage space would be about 2 10x10x10 cubes in each location, probably varying dramatically by hospital size. Of course that is just proper hospitals, we have many many more medical facilities that use them. I don't see storage being a problem.
So what is the scale we are talking here? A complete 6 month supply would be half the cost, which still seems excessive. And this is a pandemic scenario we are talking about that uses a lot of gloves, not a national security concern where we would not have that much additional use.
Yes, if they fired her for no reason…
No reason stated is trickier if the employee shows a timeline/cause and effect then gets discovery in court. Also, firing for no reason would not be very believable in itself compared to a timeline.
This is why employers even get extra careful with documentation in some situations where they have cause but also potential legal issues.
Why is it so simple? Instead of investing billions, perhaps a stockpile is a better strategy.
IP law can be a thing while maximizing transparency by not including trade secrets as a concept.
The Readme is slim, with the intent to show a hello world but the tests do. Look in https://github.com/Cpp2Rust/cpp2rust/blob/master/tests/ub/
There is a major contradiction depending on the definition of “support staff” and the role of the llm in the system which may need access to sensitive data or systems to perform its functions.
Pretty much every item besides the Open Closed Principle which deals with deals with future changes touch on being able to snap pieces that know as little as possible about each other together to create the final product while being robust to change in the underlying pieces.
This comes out in the practical world in being able to make Java libraries that don't need to be recompiled or redistributed because of changes to other parts.
This sort of object oriented programming was doomed to fail because it requires thoughtful world building and not a direct assault on the ticket you were assigned.
It you look at most of SOLID it is about building little pieces that eventually will fit together and rules to avoid incompatibilities when the world you built comes together.
They are still above a ridiculously high IPO price. It's hard to see it as not a success.
Shouldn't the punishment for obstruction, in many cases, be higher than the base offense to prevent that as a default strategy to beat the base offense? Granted, not that much higher, but there is some logic to it being a greater offense.
We do have semiprivate places in public, for example bathrooms, based on an expectation of privacy. There is no reason that expectation cannot be changed or extended in ways.
It makes sense if ruining lives is good for the company, firing and layoffs that are /necessary/ are hard for anyone with empathy. They should be rewarded for doing that.
That’s very appealing, the problem is the prompts control the results to such a degree, the person composing the prompts are the executives and at that point, you have not done anything.
The most valuable company in the world hasnt shown a dime in profit.
NVidia is quite profitable (it may not be enough to justify its current market cap), so is Aramco. Which is the most valuable in the world is up to you.
This is a bit of a trick question. The law is explicitly written to make this illegal. If it was not explicit, it most likely would be legal by time shifting precedent.
They could run their service at a profit?
In international trade, isn’t this called dumping which gets major political pushback?
I think a lot of people don’t know the http/1.x protocol from url (header) to body is a stream of text* separated by \r\n.
* the body may be compressed.
I can't see the methodology, but it would shock me if they did not take into account the local high based on the time of year.
Edit: In the methodology section it is not clear whether they used one average or average for the date.
They are not exporting the models, they are exporting very speech like output.
I am a bit surprised they can’t make serious free speech arguments.
Python calls them keyword arguments.
I may be jaded, but I do not trust Google for product offering stability. Obviously, Apple is a way bigger fish.
What is it a benchmark for? All investable public stocks or the economy writ large?