HN user

rightbyte

11,168 karma
Posts2
Comments6,448
View on HN

I feel like the advantages of cultural exchange outweights the drawbacks. Boycottes should be on the margin or they are counterproductive and bellicose.

We don't have a separate, identically shaped one, made up of nicer sounding words.

We do though. It is a kind of virtue signaling to use the evil version.

E.g. "Human Resources Department" is called "Personnel Department" in non evil business speak.

To be fair "HR" is going the way of Thermos nowadays though.

The "pedo" diver thing and the booster PoE thing.

It is funny how it is the mundane things that it boil down to when one judge a someone's character. When it gets abstract it is too easy to rationalize.

our democratically elected representatives are unwilling to yield to democracy when the people wish to overrule them.

Yeah this is a big problem. Essentially I feel there is to few "the child in Emporors new clothes" that can call out obvious BS.

I.e. somewhat emotional members that don't know the unspoken rules.

But if you want a stronger argument: The general pattern is that revolutions that intend to depose the ruling class of a country run the risk of turning on themselves.

Sure. You could generalize to violent brutes should not run things if you want a nice society and they are let loose in bloody revolutions.

I would not put empaphis on some sort of ethnological mythos to why the USSR was like it was. It is a weak argument.

Zuckerberg can bribe the shareholders to not care about their lack of control.

Monarchies had to please the aristocracy, etc.

I would say that "democracy" happens on party level not voter level. Party members are way more into the details than even the most engaged voters. You need to be at the meetings to know who is pushing what. It is all in subtle things. Most people I speak to have the most naive view on how parties work internally. Like it is a person. Goomba fallacy..

And party members more understand power hierarchy. All the drama is about that internally. Commité of whatever doing whatever having a say in whatever and delegate count of whatever county level org. to distict congress org. etc.

I think a big problem is that far too few people are engaged in politics nowadays. Active party members are aware of power structures and how they work.

I enjoy making bread at home but it costs 10x and tastes like dog shit

I am sorry but you are holding it wrong. Among all the things you can do yourself cgeaper and better, bread is probably the further most low hanging fruit.

Looking at that pic I thought I mixed him up with someone else. Seems so strange that he could look happy.

[edit: Seems like the wiki page got vandalized when I looked at it some minute ago... was the photo fake?]

I wonder of he was happy with his life deed.

Yeah but I think it just took some year for ppl to notice.

2013-2014 the algorithm got more foused on non-friend posts aswell as making the prioritzation less about "likes" from friends and instead some opaque engagement metrics. Groups had to "promote" post to get their prior reach to subscribers.

Also videos started to be posted around that time?

"Viral content" got nerfed to oblivion in 2013-2014 something when Facebook made companies pay up for group exposure. (Promoted post)

Before that a popular article could be shared among different friends networks to like total exposure to like everyone logged in that were somewhat interested in the article.

I was kinda a journalist then it was a really obvious flip.

do it on someone else’s dime.

Money is just a social construct and the amount of tax dollars spent on classes in progressive tea pot clay handcraft is minuscule.

Non-tech academics were more or lessed forced into getting degrees by the job market.

There were no choice involved on part on the victims of a systematic issue, which is, gatekeeping access to middleclass jobs by the parents' bank account size with usury lending as some sort of pressure release valve.