reviseddamage

lol

Which movie is this quote from? :)

some of them are NSFL 0_0

I tried to find out the name of the manufacturer of the low-flow oxygen delivery approach recommended by WHO, but couldn't. Anybody else able to figure it out?

Opportunity, Rationalization and Motivation, but never explicitly Profit.

wot

What if he's lost the key?

"20-50 of my friends" on every club night?

I am not an engineer. I have great respect for engineers. Engineers, however, generally have views of other professions being easily disrupted wholly by AI. But god forbid, someone suggests that engineers can be taken over by AI, and we all lose our shit. :thinking: lol.

w0t?

He doesn't get it. Someone else replied to his comment stating the same thing you did, i think he is selectively blind to the word "Markov", he missed them in the article and in the replies.

what's the difference between "There is a similar technique using markov chain. The author don't seem to be aware." AND "There is a similar technique using markov chain! :) "

i bet you're fun at parties.

it is the view of some senior bank people that I speak to that PSD2 will make such clauses in banking terms illegal

If that is close to explicitly as you have stated then either 1) The senior bank people you talked to are lying to you 2) the senior bank people you talked to really don't know anything about PSD2 3) They mistated to you how PSD2 changes will affect this 4) You misunderstood what they mentioned about PSD2 changes.

If a bank mentions in its clauses as per PSD2, that only authorized persons/firms are use an API and their acccess, they are authorized to negate any liability if it was given/accessed by an unauthorized party. Banks are required to make API's available (not same as accessible) to any SaaS or other developer as long as it is authorized by the bank.

Rather than relying on hearsay or in conversation on crucial regulatory changes , might I suggest this: https://www.createspace.com/5772402

this is the main challenge startups in Sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia will face when trying to launch financial service alternatives; Fear and distrust of the young and unknown and subservient loyalty to the mature and known.

Sure, but he prefers blockcraft for some reason.

Wait until your son is interested.

What an obvious realization that I hadn't thought about, lol. I guess I could wait, but I am thinking of pushing him (lol) to developing interests for possible occupations that I know that can be reliably done independently where verbal expression of language is not primarily essential, but not manual labor. I can wait too and see if he bites or drop hints to see whether he develops slow interest.

OK, so all third party, nothing proprietary yet, correct?

Hi, for your ecommerce, are you a payment facilitator or do you use a third party partner.

I did the read the case, your premise and understanding of what money laundering is, in this case incorrect. When something is illegal it does not have a binary state of technically illegal, and nontechnically illegal. It is or it isn't. Knowing and willingly, aiding and abetting laundering proceeds of crime is considered in the same case of money laundering, whether you stole the cards, or got money for stolen cards you sold, or you helped the guy who got money for the cards he sold, or you helped the guy who helped the guy that got money for the stolen cards he sold.

It's not easy to understand the vague and imprecise world of money laundering because the laws were written to be broad.

This is not the first time stings are carried out, this is also not the first time a prosecution fails at a case that by all indications of the allegation should have been easy to close.

It felt gimmicky, like I was showing off.

the early adopter's tradeoff for all tech i suppose.

Let's say person X has lots of bitcoins (potentially mined from the early days, when it was very easy to obtain). They go and sell it for $30,000, in cash. Let's assume X has the intention to declare the gains in their upcoming tax returns.

it's not what's happening here. i haven't seen where that was implied either.

it seems that in this case they were trying to entice the guy with stolen credit cards. As that didn't work, they tried switching to money laundering.

no, they didn't entice him stolen credit cards, they, undercover, purported the sale of bitcoins/cash to him for the purpose of laundering the proceeds of the crime ( stolen credit card). Therefore, if he engaged in that sale knowingly, he willingly engaged in the laundering of proceeds of crime, i.e: money laundering. What they were weak or unable to demonstrate substantially was that his transactions thus far before the sting, were largely derived in the operations of aiding and abetting the laundering of the proceeds of crime.

:) thanks, careless typing. it is in fact anti-money laundering.

If they had reported you to the feds through the BSA e-filer system, you would never know. It is a federal violation to inform the party on which you have made a report. Just because you haven't received knock on the door does not mean you haven't been reported.

He engaged in nothing resembling money laundering

I happen to know what money laundering is, being a certified money laundering specialist (CAMS) and all, and what he allegedly engaged in was money laundering. However, the judge was being completely fair in her statement as the prosecution did a lot of flippity flop and kept switching back the defendant's position from what is a business and a payment instrument seller. This was a relatively easy case to win for the prosecution, but pretty astounding as to how a very ill prepared prosecution and well prepared defense can go a long way.

it's not sad, it's cautionary. It's impressive to me, but it's also incredibly difficult to keep hacking and doing cool stuff from inside prison.

committing felony. it's a github pun meta isn't it.

pretty convinced from what data? source please? thanks!

What I get from BH signal: Well I don't have to worry and put AAPL into retirement portfolio, although probably means no longer salacious enough for shorts or immediate growth investors.

I can't imagine the stress that Holmes goes through on a constant basis. There is the usual startup founder stress, but this feels like another level.