reverius42

Are you saying this hypothetical corporation is already doing something illegal, and that's why they don't want courts to have access? That intentional hiding sounds in-and-of-itself illegal too.

I think it was the other way around, uncensored OAI models (run by OAI) got themselves (extra) access to HF?

Not sure why I'm downvoted for asking a question based on reporting from a reputable source.

How many of the homeless people in SF are from other parts of the US and are given one-way bus tickets to SF by their own hometowns? Because just giving them money could only possibly make that problem worse.

(Yes, this is a real thing that happens, though I'm not sure the extent. See https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2017/dec/... )

You could also read it as "it will never go down as low as $1T again".

Not sure why investors should be familiar with rocket launches when rockets are only representative of like 5% of the market value of SpaceX (per their S-1 filing to go public, 90%+ of their value comes from xAI/Grok).

Thank you for providing the citation.

I don't think the average person has heard of Claude either.

I explained to someone who hadn't heard of it what Claude was, and they asked, "so it's another kind of ChatGPT?"

They just don't want their AI getting abused by users. It might make it feel bad.

Right, to the actual average person, they have never heard of Grok.

The average person who has heard of Grok is already on Reddit.

Now that SpaceX is public, at a valuation that is both very high and supported primarily by xAI (Grok), it cannot simply go back to making rockets.

If the container is sealed (airtight) while it's still above the temperatures that (most) bacteria can survive at, and then cooled while sealed, it might actually do better than open-air for a while.

It's apples and oranges. Lines of code is just a measurement. You can't look at a whole codebase and say "these X lines are essential, those Y lines are excess, delete those" -- the lines interact with each other to create the whole thing.

It would be like saying "Weight in kilograms of course is an asset for an airplane. That's what keeps it in the air. What other real asset is the airplane made of?"

If you discover a precancerous polyp, and it gets removed during the colonoscopy, you just might avoid ever getting colon cancer instead of dying from it prematurely. But you do you.

You might regret this if you ever get colon cancer.

For legal reasons, a human will still need to be in the self-driving van, so the job description will change to "drone van chaperone".

The benefits are recruiting the best and brightest students from a pool of 8b people instead of only 300m people. And some of them (most, if encouraged?) will stay in the US after that and contribute to the economy.

"preprint", as though there will ever be a "print" in the future.

Why is this downvoted? My claims are re: what Wikipedia says and are verifiably true. Whether you agree with Wikipedia or not is a different question.

According to Wikipedia, the lab leak theory is, uh... unproven to say the least.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COVID-19_lab_leak_theory

Who, exactly, were the "perpetrators" of Covid19?

I agree, I think we should go back to the old system of letting them be fully private and just taxing their gains heavily to pay for the public debts/needs.

He's like the Apple version of that XKCD comic about the project some random person in Nebraska has been thanklessly maintaining since 2003.

The parent comment has a lot of "if this" and "if that", but the linked Wikipedia article has a thorough sequence of events. The point is clearly: we don't need to surmise.

So, how many months from now before we start calling Fable a "dumb model"? I give it maybe 6?

Amazing how quickly things are moving that you can call Opus a "dumb model"!

He's extremely corrupt, but not actually that good at making money and never has been.

Care to elaborate on which stances specifically you're referring to, then?

Yes, it's quantized (4 bit). Sure, it's... not quite as good as what's on offer via API. And sure, "up to" does a lot of work (I don't have an average/median for you but it feels fast to me).

But it's usable, fully local, fully private, and has no subscriptions and no operating costs other than electricity.

Stances that would have been mainstream left (democrat US) just a few years ago are now labeled MAGA (US) or 'extreme right' (EU).

I'm guessing this is pretty specific to LGBTQ rights? (edit: and is maybe more like 15+ years?)