HN user

reqo

2,098 karma
Posts145
Comments61
View on HN
www.bbc.com 10d ago

How Aldi is taking on US supermarkets with its $4 almond butter

reqo
3pts1
arxiv.org 1mo ago

AI as "Co-Founder": GenAI for Entrepreneurship

reqo
2pts0
wmo.int 2mo ago

WMO: Likelihood Increases of El Niño

reqo
6pts0
opensource.googleblog.com 6mo ago

What an open lab can build with TPUs, Jax, and a little persistence

reqo
2pts0
www.youtube.com 7mo ago

The most complex model we understand [video]

reqo
3pts0
research.google 7mo ago

Gemini provides automated feedback for theoretical computer scientists

reqo
2pts0
www.reuters.com 7mo ago

China's exports top expectations on strong sales to non-US markets

reqo
3pts0
www.bbc.com 8mo ago

US presses Europe on rules for big tech companies

reqo
3pts0
engineering.atspotify.com 8mo ago

Spotify's Journey with Our Background Coding Agent (Part 1)

reqo
2pts0
testing.googleblog.com 9mo ago

Simplify your code: Functional core, imperative shell

reqo
411pts213
www.reuters.com 9mo ago

SoftBank to buy ABB's robotics business in $5.4B deal

reqo
21pts1
news.ycombinator.com 9mo ago

Ask HN: What does your machine learning pipeline look like?

reqo
4pts0
github.com 10mo ago

Failed Machine Learning

reqo
1pts0
github.com 10mo ago

Feature Engineering A-Z

reqo
3pts0
github.com 11mo ago

DINOv3

reqo
179pts31
seattledataguy.substack.com 1y ago

MongoDB Is Great for Analytics; Until It's Not (2023)

reqo
1pts0
www.open-contracting.org 1y ago

How US cities are supporting local economies through open contracting

reqo
2pts0
visionbook.mit.edu 1y ago

Foundations of Computer Vision

reqo
3pts0
blog.westerndigital.com 1y ago

Understanding Access Patterns in Machine Learning

reqo
3pts0
arxiv.org 1y ago

Three things everyone should know about Vision Transformers

reqo
71pts17
blog.iclr.cc 1y ago

Leveraging LLM feedback to enhance review quality

reqo
1pts0
datawithrust.com 1y ago

Data with Rust

reqo
3pts0
nvlabs.github.io 1y ago

FoundationStereo: Zero-Shot Stereo Matching

reqo
2pts1
planetbanatt.net 1y ago

Model Merging and You

reqo
2pts0
edexheim.github.io 1y ago

MASt3R-Slam: Real-Time Dense Slam with 3D Reconstruction Priors

reqo
1pts0
arxiv.org 1y ago

Robust autonomy emerges from self-play

reqo
140pts62
www.argmin.net 1y ago

Flavors of Overfitting

reqo
1pts0
mlpocket.com 1y ago

Why Learn Data Visualization?

reqo
2pts1
statisticsbyjim.com 1y ago

Ghost Hunting with a Statistics Mindset

reqo
2pts0
aiven.io 1y ago

SQL query optimization: a comprehensive developer's guide

reqo
11pts1

While fundamentals are important to learn, there is also a huge benefit in learning specific tools and frameworks. There is no ”one size fits all” when it comes to software and more often than not, you need very customized solution for optimal performance. Moreover, learning to master a tool often means you are also able to improve it, which is part of the reason open-source tools usually improve with the loyal contributers!

This ‘goal drift’ means that agents, or tasks done in a sequence with iteration, get less reliable. It ‘forgets’ where to focus, because its attention is not selective nor dynamic.

I don't know if I agree with this. The attention module is specifically designed to be selective and dynamic, otherwise it would not be much different than a word embedding (look up "soft" weights vs "hard" weights [1]). I think deep learning should not be confused with deep RL. LLMs are autoregressive models which means that they are trained to predict the next token and that is all they do. The next token is not necessarily the most reasonable (this is why datasets are super important for better performance). Deep RL models on the other hand, seem to be excellent at agency and decision making (although in restricted environment), because they are trained to do so.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attention_(machine_learning)

The facilities will reportedly consume as much as 13 percent of the plant's output.

Why are AI products being shipped so aggressively despite being so inefficient? Is code autocompletion and generating random images really worth so much electricity? Shouldn’t we wait until the research has created an efficient architecture that is easily scalable first?

Show HN: Pong Wars 2 years ago

It does not have to have a use or a point, it is up to you to decided what it represents. I see at as an interactive yin and yang!

I think in the long run, it is in the interest of AI companies to incentivize creators to create high quality data! Not paying them their fair share will likely decrease the volume of high quality data available (or make it much less accessible). Unless these companies already have developed another architecture that can learn much more from the same dataset, the lack of new high quality data will be a problem for future larger models!

Merry Christmas everyone! Thanks everyone for you great contributions to the community and thanks to the dear moderators for the great job they are doing!

I believe RAG is more appropriate for this! While you can certainly fine tune on a pdf, you are essentially fine turning with batch size == 1, so you should not expect good results! Also you need a label (for example summary) in order to fine-tune!

I honestly don't think there is any incentive for large corporation to care too much about things like this and, on the contrary, they are incentivized to do more! The fine they get is basically cost of doing business and since our attention is engineered to be short, the negative PR won't last long enough to have a huge impact. Unless we see a "too big to fail" company actually fail because something like this, we won't see any change in their behvaiour!

I think this is really interesting from a meta (in-context) learning pov, but I think at some point prompt engineering stops being prompt engineering and instead becomes in-context training. This is problematic for applications such as search or completion, unless some other software/model does this automatically for you!

I don’t see the contradiction. Humans can be emotional and at the same use science to make all humans life better! In fact why would we ever develop any technology that makes life better for others if we don’t have any feelings for them?

Finding that 70% of attention heads and 20% of feed-forward networks can be excised with minimal effect on in-context learning suggests that large language models are undertrained.

I thought that it was common knowledge that LLMs are undertrained, none of the publicly available loss graphs show any sign of convergence!

Another probable bad side effect of AI will be that a generation of developers will become dependent on copilot/chatgpt to be able to write code! They will definitely perform worse than before llm era without the help of a llm!