HN user

renholder

662 karma

Jag vet inte vad jag kan säga här. Languages: C++, C#, Python, PowerShell, Rust...

Posts4
Comments314
View on HN

Every year, I have to dig up receipts for what we spent on daycare, what we spent out of our HSA accounts, etc. The government doesn't track any of that.

Aside from the daycare costs (as an aside, creche in Ireland is quite decent[0]), isn't all of that is still reported to the IRS? Your HSA isn't sitting in some dark corner that the government doesn't know about, ever since the Patriot Act, yeah?

I'm fairly certain it is reported to the IRS because Americans find getting bank accounts overseas quite cumbersome because your government strong-arms agreements that demand that Americans' overseas bank accounts are reported to the IRS. Surely, more domestic reporting shouldn't come as a surprise or shock.

I guarantee you that if you make false statements using Ireland's online system for claiming tax credits, you're under penalty of perjury as well.

What do I get for a broken guarantee[1]? :)

This batering back and forth really only arrives at the conclusion that I originally posited:

Those of us in the PAYE system[s] would abhor having to do things the American way and this wasn't meant as an affront (and I apologise if anyone may have taken it that way).

Our tax agencies are responsible for keeping track of these things and the only things we're responsible for is reporting status changes and/or providing receipts for other proofs of burden (such as Independent Contractors who file as Directors of Umbrella Corporations and need to write-off business expenses).

[0] https://www.citizensinformation.ie/en/education/pre_school_e...

[1] https://www.revenue.ie/en/personal-tax-credits-reliefs-and-e...

Is this similar to PAYE or do you actually have to submit a tax return but it's pre-filled for you?

As long as your PAYE is like Ireland's (ROI) PAYE, then the American's system is far-removed from it.

Even though their tax revenue office gets the reports from businesses for how much they were paid and how much taxes they paid, the Americans still need to fill out a tax form - every year - to repeat the same information (it's an added benefit for the prison system, in that mistakes on tax forms can equate to jail time). They get a form from their employer (which their tax office also has), that contains all of this information.

In the UK, most people don't have to submit a tax return at all. Not sure the actual cost of this, but the convenience is unparalleled.

Aye, it's the same in Ireland (ROI). You can just call-up or email Revenue and they check if you've overpaid, by how much, and they just send you the money. No forms. No bullshit. No threats of jail time. It's pretty deadly[0].

You want nothing to do with the Yanks' tax system, trust me.

[0] https://www.whygo.com/ireland/irish-slang-deadly.html

Perhaps this is selecting for desperate job hunters who send thank you notes.

That's entirely plausible. I mean, you're probably <insert arbitrary percentage here> more likely to not turn an offer down, even if it's below the cost-of-living for the area in question, if you're willing to go to those lengths, yeah?

Their solution to the problem of having offers turned down seems to be not to investigate why but to just hire the people most willing to take them... I mean, they found a loop-hole but to quote the Big Lebowski: "You're not wrong, Walter, you're just an asshole."

What about 95% of the content on the internet that ads pay for?

This is such a pedestrian argument, as if advertising pays for the content to be made and then hosted - when the truth of the matter is that someone else pays for the content to be created (and hosted) and that cost is recouped (with additional profit added on top), after the fact by advertising.

For example, advertising companies are not paying for YouTube content creators to create their content and then for it to be hosted on YouTube. Advertising companies seek those with the largest audience (typically, that requires having made content a priori, yeah?) and then make partnerships with those people and, then, those people may make videos pushing those products.

WSJ, since this is predominantly an American board, doesn't have advertisers paying their reporters', photographers', editors', etc. salaries. Advertisers are not paying for the content to be created or to be hosted. All of that is done by WSJ, who then recoups the costs via advertising, yeah?

So, the only point at which "95% of the content on the internet that ads pay for" is true, is (predominantly) after the content has been made and hosted and is only true over time (e.g.: not with immediate effect).

Malware isn't advertising

You have that backwards from the OC's comment: Advertising networks have been used to push malware.

...and security is an issue in any industry and sector.

This comes across as a whataboutism, "So? Other industries have security problems, too!" and, whilst true, largely ignores the fact that those other industries (mostly at large) weren't leveraged as attack vectors to spread malware. (I'm assuming your meaning of "industry" infers the meaning of "commercial industry", that generates revenue in exchange for a product or service, which would ignore the obvious things like P2P and the like.)

But online ads and the technology that makes them work have played a considerable part in the development of almost every aspect of what we’ve come to enjoy as the free and open internet of today.

Online ads and free and open internet are not synonymous and I really wish that people would stop trying to equate them as such. The pervasive advertising systems that are running today (e.g.: Facebook, Google, LinkedIn, etc.) aren't running to make the internet free and open but to squeeze out more profit margins for their respective shareholders and nothing more.

Were online ads the cause of the move from dial-up to "high-speed" internet? I'd argue it was actually pictures, graphics, movies, etc. and the desire to be able to consume those at a reasonable rate that caused the move from dial-up to "high-speed" internet.

How did advertising play a role in the development of that portion of the free and open internet? (Genuinely asking, in case I'm missing something here.)

Right!? You can't have prisons run by for-profit companies and then expect everyone to believe you want low recidivism rates - much less low crime rates. Bodies make the businesses money, businesses making money keep running the jails/prisons, and "being tough on crime" gets the votes - so it's a self-perpetuating machine.

These services are ludicrously expensive. Video calls cost 40¢ per minute in Newton County, 50¢ per minute in Lowndes County, and $10 per call in Allen County.

The use of the video system is now compulsory, in person visits are banned, and another at-cost for families of criminals is seemingly tacked on because... ...freedom? Capitalism?

At what point do we agree tapping the families of inmates (note: not the inmates, themselves) out of money is going too far?

...editing the registry...

and

...Linux Skills (non-negotiable)...

Why not just say "dump Windows"? It's a good OS, if you want someone to hand-hold you, but as somoene once elegantly put it: "Trying to hack in Windows is like trying to dance in bodycast."

Reverse Engineering.

They list scripting but, as saagarjha notes, knowing how to program is a pivotal quality. Otherwise, when you reverse engineer something, how do you know what the feck you're looking at?

For example (I'm aware of the irony of this example), it does me no good to reverse engineer something in ILDASM[0], if I haven't the faintest idea of what it is I'm looking at.

[0] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/tools/ilda...

True, even in post-mortem debugging (assuming I have the objects from the heap), it's not like I'm going to exclude the addresses of objects in my write-ups (or as they're exposed via commands, such as !sosex.mdso[0]).

In native, if you're on the stack (e.g.: not using pointers), then addresses don't mean much of anything and if you're using pointers, memory optimisation means the address could mean feck-all after a cycle or two (assuming you've looking at an iDNA/TTT[1]).

So, to agree with you, who are agreeing with me: It is quite odd that this would be a principal argument for proquints.

[0] https://github.com/lowleveldesign/debug-recipes/blob/master/...

[1] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-hardware/drivers/de...

NOTE: 2009 should be in the title.

Debuggers could input and output memory addresses as proquints as an alternative to hex.

...but why? In debuggers, you're not concerned with memorising the address of an object as much as you are concerned with what the hell is mangling said object. There's no "value-add" for proquints, here. If you were live-debugging in a session with someone else, sure, but how often are you generally doing that?

Network tools such as browsers, ping, netstat, traceroute, etc. could input and output proquints as an alternative to dotted quads.

Again, what is the value-add? Since I've known 4-octet IP addresses and numbers my whole life, it would take more effort to translate from proquint, to understand the output on the screen. Adding a translation layer in a cut-over fashion instead of a phased-in fashion just seems like wholly unnecessary overhead, only intended to further justify the proquint, yeah?

...or licensed, fuck you Hollywood

Pretty much landed the blame where it should fall but it's not the only one. Take a look at PDFs with DRMs and what happens when those companies no longer exist or the like. It's chasing the almighty <insert currency here> that locks you into licensing to watch, instead of ownership.

Long live the VHS days... (...damn the man, save the Empire.)

The scammers were ruled in the wrong, but the logins themselves were ruled to be an ok way of doing business.

This seems like something that the Riksdagen should step-in on. BankId was meant as validating a legal entity (I am who I say I am) and a third-party presenting that they are they are that legal entity (in this case, the person in question) would certainly seem to circumvent the intention behind that.

I have been on a few overnight trains here in Sweden and they have all been quite old, noisy and shaky ones.

I've been on an overnight snabbtåg (SJ) from Köpenhamn to Stockholm to Norrköping and it wasn't that bad (however, I was the only one in my [train] car).

Overnight ferries are quite nice, I'll concede, such as from Holyhead to Dublin or Dublin to Cherbourg; however, that falls to the wayside when the seas are quite rough. In that sense, I would prefer the rickety train to the heaving ship.

Location: Sweden OR Republic of Ireland

Remote: Yes

Willing to relocate: Yes (for the right job)

Résumé/CV: Available on request (via email)

Email: codedebugging [(at)] outlook [(dot)] ie

Blog: http [(colon)] [(//)] iseelondoniseefrance [(dot)] se

Languages: C#, C++

Scripting: Python, PowerShell

Experience: 5+ years at a FANG company

Technologies: Windbg, ClrMd, Exchange (2007, 2010, 2016, 2019, Office365), Active Directory, Git, Azure Dev Ops, Docker, Visual Studio, PyCharm, CLion, Azure (Cosmos, Service Fabric, etc.)

Exactly, the only outrage is them being paid...

From the article:

...though the CSA is responsible for figuring out how much of that goes to the prisoners...

Are you sure they're getting paid, right now?

...not using that money to help the victims...

And, at what point, would this vengence form of justice stop? How much would be "adequate" for compensation to their victims? Are they still not penalised, even after they've "paid their debt to society"? ....because, last I recall hearing of the prison system in the United States, the punitive punishment doesn't really end - from being unable to vote to being unable to get a job because of a record to a number of other maliciously designed rules/laws intentionally meant/designed to further punish them, yeah?

Things like targets or published measurements that have no particular purpose in your process improvement cycle are risky because they will change behaviour in undefined ways. You should always avoid them if you can.

The problem is that a lot of businesses focus hard on metrics and this doesn't translate to a process improvement cycle, rather, it's on a "person improvement" cycle - making raises, bonuses, promotions, etc. dependent on that notion.

A perfect example how this is problematic is in areas like Customer Support, where a number of handled tickets doesn't equate to a good value of the product provided.

In a posit, let's consider there's two Support Agents working on supporting 'X' product for 'Y' company, over the course of a quarter. The product and the company have been around and established for quite some time, so there's no need for semantics on availability pool in this posit. Support Agent 1 works a case that takes 3 months but is a relevantly large product bug that impacts millions of users around the world via the fix.

Support Agent 1's workload, of course, has a considerably smaller queue size due to this. Now, Support Agent 2 keeps picking-up the low-hanging fruit because it's a numbers game and they know this.

What should happen is that management sees the disproportionate numbers and attempts to find out why that is (and/or attempts to automate the low-hanging fruit out of the equation). They should also look at the impact that both of their work had, in overall user-base.

Instead, what more than likely happens, is because Support Agent 1's numbers were so low, this makes Support Agent's Manager's numbers look bad and that goes up the chain. Upper Management, oft, doesn't care for the semantics around numbers, so shit rolls down-hill (as the colloquialism goes) and, now, Support Agent 1 is on "Unsatisfactory/Needs Improvement" for their review cycle, losing raises, bonuses, promotions, etc.

I think that would disenfranchise Support Agent 1.

Since this is a majority American board, consider the wonderful hell that is known as Wal-Mart. From what I understand, it also utilises metrics across the board. If you think on it, can you name a person "happy" to work there? I'd reckon you couldn't. (Again, this is my understanding of it and not anedotal, first-hand experience with the company or anyone who works for it. Aside from Asda, in the UK, Wal-Mart isn't a "thing" here.)

So, more than just being fruitless, if it doesn't go into the process improvement cycle, I'd say it rolls pretty high numbers in damaging the overall morale.

The problem is: what is success of the product?

Agreed. If it's measured in a metric, like bugs for every check-in or number of check-ins or numbers of lines of code, then reducing it down to metrics doesn't do anything to achieve the goal of the success of the product.

I'd - cautiously - argue it actually favours success of the individual over success of the product.

Malicious content is embedded in such emails

Isn't that what content scanning is supposed to check for? I mean, it's not like they're not scanning the email body for keyword extrapolation, anyways, right?

To be fair, though, Stripe should change their SPF record to hard-fail (-all).

;; ANSWER SECTION:

stripe.com. 600 IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:173.193.210.51/32 ip4:166.78.69.60/32 ip4:198.2.180.60/32 ip4:13.111.2.227/32 include:spf1.stripe.com include:greenhouse-outbound-mail.stripe.com ~all"

stripe.com. 600 IN TXT "docusign=4a93db58-af07-4632-a881-b569d41a6c57"

That sentence right there describes one of the main problems with reddit: Power-seeking moderators who are more interested in flexing on users than making good communities.

Agreed. Reddit went from being an active discussion board (if I can call it that) to having controlled dialogues. Echo chambers now exist, everywhere. Essentially, each sub is - veritably - it's own version of r/TumblerInAction on 'x' given topic, whether it be politics, social discourse, or what-have-you.

Even the ban against "hate subs" doesn't seem to take into the fact that a lot of hate subs still exist[0], espousing hate and dehumanisation of people. (Far more have sprung-up since this list was made but do note that the list referenced has a political leaning to it, as well. Perhaps, though, this has more to do with the radicalisation of politics.)

[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstHateSubreddits/comments/68da...

I have always been all-in on "no brexit" for last three years.

I've always been fascinated by the "drive it off of the cliffs" mentality, and I don't mean this as an affront, in any form or fashion.

For example, what is your opinion of the breakdown of the Good Friday agreement? Is there a genuine belief that the bombings wouldn't recur or is it more of an NIMBY, so not my concern? (Again, not an affront, I genuinely want to understand.) Or what's the opinion on Scotland having another referendum on independence, since they voted remain?