HN user
You’ll see results as soon as your first visitors arrive. Our agent evaluates every unique visitor, researches and qualifies B2B prospects based on your custom criteria, and starts showing you qualified leads in real time.
We’re not externalizing costs onto users because our demand inference uses only qualified, high‑precision intelligence to eliminate massive spam and irrelevant outreach that wastes everyone’s time and erodes trust. We conducted user interviews upfront to understand these pain points before we started building. By focusing solely on B2B, we reduce noise, protect privacy, and respect people rather than treating them like targets.
Profit alone isn’t the motivation. Unlike polluting rivers, our goal isn’t to externalize costs onto society or the environment. We see a real problem: B2B teams waste massive time and budgets chasing unqualified leads, spamming prospects, and burning through acquisition dollars. By delivering truly high‑precision demand intelligence, we help businesses focus only on the buyers who actually want to talk, cutting down on unwanted outreach and wasted resources.
In other words, our goal is to create efficiency and reduce friction for buyers, sellers, and the planet rather than offloading harm onto someone else.
Thanks for bringing this up. We don’t collect personal data or process any PII. We only enrich qualified, high‑intent buyer intelligence, and we do so solely for B2B. Some GTM vendors have experimented in this space, but we focus on AI‑native demand inference with far greater precision and efficiency, while always following strict safety and privacy practices.
As the context grows, the output (usually a structured function call) remains relatively short. This makes the ratio between prefilling and decoding highly skewed in agents compared to chatbots. The problem is that context engineering is still an emerging science, even though for agent systems, it's already essential. This is overall a really interesting post and makes me think of Chroma’s technical report on context rot: https://research.trychroma.com/context-rot
The fish-trapping network fed the growth of early Maya centers
Malta's first settlers arrived from mainland Europe 1,000 years earlier than thought
Without the model you are nothing. Boris said it himself but then for a few weeks looks that insight was forgotten. Now everything is back in place. This could also indicate that Cursor is in a bad spot. No defensibility
For all the discussions about the slopification of the internet, the human toll on open source maintainers isn’t really talked about. It's one thing to get flooded with bad reports; it's another to have to mentally filter AI-generated submissions designed to "sound correct" but offer no real value. Totally agree with the author mentioning the emotional toll it takes to deal with these mind-numbing stupidities.
Just days before the FTC’s “Click-to-Cancel” rule was set to take effect in July 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit struck it down. The court ruled that the FTC violated federal procedural requirements by failing to conduct a preliminary regulatory analysis, which is mandatory for any rule expected to have an economic impact exceeding $100 million annually.
Although the FTC initially claimed the rule would fall below that threshold, an administrative law judge later found that compliance costs would exceed it—unless every business somehow managed to implement the rule using fewer than 23 hours of professional services at the lowest possible rate. The court concluded that the FTC’s failure to issue a separate preliminary analysis for public review deprived stakeholders of a meaningful opportunity to challenge or shape the rule, rendering it procedurally invalid.
So no, the unanimous ruling by the Eighth Circuit didn’t kill the Biden-era regulation because the judges were Republican appointees. It was struck down because bureaucratic procedures weren't followed. Its a shame because I believe canceling subscriptions should be easy. It often is not in the U.S. (I’m looking at you adobe)this really undermines consumer interests :(
Whent to check their own website about it and it seems to be “an expressive, open-source robot designed for human-robot interaction, creative coding, and AI experimentation. Fully programmable in Python (and soon JavaScript, Scratch) and priced from $299, it's your gateway into robotics AI: fun, customizable, and ready to be part of your next coding project.” From what I’ve read in the rest of their press release you are pretty spot on on the smart rotating speaker
Finally real journalism is back
I’ve been waiting for a paper on this subject every since 2022 and gpt’s introduction to the masses, pretty much confirms the widely held belief that brain connectivity systematically scales down with the amount of external support. I appreciate that they added the search engine testing group as an intermediate between the brain only and LLM group
Pretty useful paper, the framework they propose inside is user-friendly and designed to simplify the process of developing and experimenting with new RLM architecture. Also it supports different granularities of reasoning steps, ranging from individual tokens to full sentences or structured segments. And enables diverse training schemes, like OBS which is pretty neat overall
The lawsuit isn’t a big surprise considering how litigious they are when it comes to anything close to their intellectual property, more so suprised that it was only filed now and not months ago.
It’s barely been 3 days since the entire panel of vaccine experts has been removed, and considering the vetting process for appointing new members to the panel takes years. It’s not surprising that the new appointees aren’t good, even though RFK has pledged that none of the new ACIP members would be "ideological anti-vaxxers” I doubt that will be true and hold up under scrutiny