HN user

rauschma

480 karma
Posts3
Comments54
View on HN

Versioning has many downsides.

Let’s assume we create a new version of JavaScript that is not backward compatible and fixes all of its flaws. As a result, we’d encounter the following problems:

• JavaScript engines become bloated: they need to support both the old and the new version. The same is true for tools such as IDEs and build tools.

• Programmers need to know, and be continually conscious of, the differences between the versions.

• We can either migrate all of an existing code base to the new version (which can be a lot of work). Or we can mix versions and refactoring becomes harder because we can’t move code between versions without changing it.

• We somehow have to specify per piece of code – be it a file or code embedded in a web page – what version it is written in. Every conceivable solution has pros and cons. For example, _strict mode_ is a slightly cleaner version of ES5. One of the reasons why it wasn’t as popular as it should have been: it was a hassle to opt in via a directive at the beginning of a file or a function.

More information: https://exploringjs.com/js/book/ch_history.html#backward-com...

I have used many languages in my nearly 40 years as a programmer (Scheme, C++, Java, Python, Haskell, OCaml, Rust, etc.) and still enjoy JavaScript: It’s decent as a language and there is so much you can do with it.

Tips:

• If you like static typing, you’ll want to use TypeScript. It’s more work to set up, but it catches many bugs, especially subtle ones where JavaScript’s semantics are not intuitive.

• I learned a lot about JavaScript (and Node.js) by writing shell scripts in Node.js.

My books on JavaScript, TypeScript and Node.js shell scripting are free to read online and target people who already know how to program: https://exploringjs.com

Thanks for the kind words!

W.r.t. the “Dr.”: It’s interesting how much reactions differ. In Germany, people tend to think you are smart if you have a title. In the States, people tend to think you’re incapable of functioning in the real world.

I’m still experimenting. The title has worked well for me w.r.t. branding. Sometimes I mention it, sometimes I don’t.

For what it’s worth: That’s not what motivated this blog post. It was that I often encounter people who see the three dots being used in parameter definitions or destructuring and don’t understand what is going on (because they think it is spreading). The section on triple dots not being operators is more of a side note.

Everything you’ve mentioned plays a role. It has also worked well marketing-wise: In Germany, people take you more seriously; in the US it doesn’t matter, but a title is still more memorable.

The first variable using `const` is called ”immutable”, which is misleading, since only the _assignment_ is immutable

That’s a first look at the syntax. The details are explained here: https://exploringjs.com/impatient-js/ch_variables-assignment...

But I should clarify that “immutable” here means “immutable binding”.

Only single- and double-quoted strings are introduced at first

I had to start somewhere. Template literals and tagged templates are a more complex topic that benefits from strings already having been introduced.

Arrow functions are introduced as just another syntax

Arrow functions are introduced in detail here: https://exploringjs.com/impatient-js/ch_callables.html

---

In general, I occasionally have to initially leave out some details so that the book can be read linearly. But those details are then filled in later in the book.