rat9988

My guess is, Zuck really likes the idea,

You made an assumption, that's a good thing to expand thinking.

It's almost as if having a CEO of a company placed beyond the control of the corporate board is a bad thing.

You can't draw such conclusion then.

Please link these comments in chatgpt, grok, claude and gemini announcement threads on hacker news.

I don't see it in grok or chatgpt launch threads.

The current case still seems very heavy on personal preference. Principles application is subjective as we are all human. I found the comment as interesting as the quote it is answering.

They never claimed it was technically hard. Brand recognition is their forte. They found out there is a need, developped a product around it.

Your answer's tone is weird.

Obviously B2B given the context

Not really, there is a promise of a better career in the future.

The art is not lost, just not funded. Feel free to fund the programmers for your own software projects.

Too late for what? For you? maybe. There are many others that are okay with it and it doesn't disminish the quality of the work. Props to the author.

You usually cite the original story

Banned from doing free work?

N*Log(N) can be approximated to O(N) for most realistic usecases.

As for LLM, there is probably some cost constant added once it can fit on a single GPU, but should probably be almost linear.

I wonder how you get paid if you fail the interview.

There is a difference between being smart and acting smart.

if you answer ""Well I would probably go home and work on my resume because that's a fool's errand." You probably are missing the wood and the trees.

This part of trust was not about you trusting the government though so it is okay.

Just curious how much does it sell? It gives an idea about how much my personal data is worth

This feels like piracy to me and an unintended usecase of archives.

I'm not american, but it seems to me there are enough american job seekers in CS to justify not needing H1B.

I'm not sure anyway what is the relationship between the potential difficulty of hiring new folks, and firing current folks in USA to offshore roles, are relates.

Given we are more interested in the end than in the mean, it is a good usage.

What is the difference between having the militaire have boots in the ground to kill you if you don't comply, and having military in the border next to you to kill you, bomb you or kidnap you if you don't comply?

Self driving cars is not a proof. It only proves that having quick gains doesn't mean necessarily you'll get a 100% fast. It doesn't prove it will necessarily happen.

Well, the first 90% is easy, the hard part is the second 90%.

You'd need to prove that this assertion applies here. I understand that you can't deduce the future gains rate from the past, but you also can't state this as universal truth.

They probably don't need it. You can start a crowdfunding campaign if you do.

I'm pretty the armies of accountants would have rated it higher if the cashflow was positive than negative. Negative can't be good even while accounting for taxes.

Yes, it’s there, but very much in the fineprint.

This is where it belongs, at best. He doesn't even have to disclose it. Prompting so that the ai writes the code faster than you is okay.

Yes, now generalize the theorem to any human to make it usable on a daily basis.

The error rate would still be improved overall and might make it a viable tool for the price depending on the usecase.

There is no "HN comments". Each commenter has its own sensibilities. Some of them just saw the word Adblock from new ceo and went full defense mode without trying to understand that the guy was just talking about what he feels is good, and there is no need to come with the worst possible interpretation of each sentence.