HN user

randoom

16 karma
Posts1
Comments6
View on HN

Not to disregard what you wrote, I just wanted to add that I don't think this post wanted to objectively compare the github and dropbox pricing models.

IMO he just wanted to show how ridiculous (in his opinion) the github model is by applying it to dropbox.

Slightly meta/off-topic:

By just looking at the comments I have seen about five controversial statements like Parent: Red meat is bad, because $study Child: No, it isn't see $counter-study

What is up with the science in foodscience?

All the camps (paleo, vegetarian, vegan, locavore, raw foodists, ...) are citing studies which support their point of view and disregard the others.

Or another good example is the Weston A. Price Foundation [1] and Dr. Fuhrman [2]. They are "battling" each other with study after study.

Why are there so many contradicting and controversial studies and opinions in a field which calls itself a science?

[1] http://www.westonaprice.org/

[2] http://www.diseaseproof.com/