HN user

queeerkopf

218 karma
Posts16
Comments42
View on HN
news.ycombinator.com 9y ago

Ask HN: What changes have you made to your internet usage since 2013 (Snowden)?

queeerkopf
4pts2
news.ycombinator.com 10y ago

Ask HN: Which browser add-ons do you use, what for and how did you discover them?

queeerkopf
11pts21
www.dw.com 10y ago

Europeans allowed to sue over privacy breaches in new EU-US data agreement

queeerkopf
2pts0
www.politico.eu 11y ago

European Commission Charges Six US Studios for Antitrust Violations

queeerkopf
1pts0
www.thelocal.de 11y ago

Hacker Attack Targets German Bundestag Data

queeerkopf
1pts0
www.theglobalist.com 11y ago

Can Iceland Save the World?

queeerkopf
2pts0
news.ycombinator.com 11y ago

Ask HN: Is there a repository listing privacy sensitive files with default path?

queeerkopf
4pts2
www.nature.com 11y ago

World Library of Science launched: Nature Education/UNESCO joint elearning site

queeerkopf
1pts0
online.wsj.com 12y ago

EU's Highest Court: ISPs may be forced to block copyright infringing sites

queeerkopf
2pts2
www.codeproject.com 12y ago

Using an evolutionary algorithm to create a cellular automata

queeerkopf
1pts0
techon.nikkeibp.co.jp 12y ago

Normal Earphones Used to Measure Heart Rate While Playing Music

queeerkopf
1pts0
blogs.oracle.com 12y ago

Oracle Whitepaper: The Department of Defense and Open Source Software

queeerkopf
1pts1
blogs.wsj.com 12y ago

News Site Held Responsible for Users’ Defamatory Comments

queeerkopf
40pts16
www.bloomberg.com 12y ago

Vodafone Germany hacked, 2 million clients' banking data accessed

queeerkopf
6pts1
wikileaks.org 12y ago

WikiLeaks will file criminal complaints concerning seizures after cablegate

queeerkopf
2pts0
blog.avast.com 12y ago

Linux Trojan “Hand of Thief” ungloved

queeerkopf
2pts1

Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.

This directly contradicts the excess mortality data published by CDC itself. [1] From the article it's unclear to me what evidence led to the claims presented. So far the article seems very unconvincing. Seems like John Hopkins has good reasons to take it down.

Also bear in mind that the excess mortality we've seen so far is with all the measures to limit the impact of the pandemic. It's fair to assume that excess mortality would be a lot higher without those. Our World In Data has a well explained international overview and analysis. [2][3]

[1] https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid19/excess_deaths.htm

[2] https://ourworldindata.org/excess-mortality-covid

[3] https://ourworldindata.org/covid-excess-mortality

Ask HN Threads with similiar topics/recommendations:

* Books you wish you had read earlier? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14477851

* What books have made the biggest impact on your mental models? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15155833

* Books on specific topics that have applied to many areas of your life? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14477851

* Books with a high signal to noise ratio? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10027102

To Have or To Be? by Erich Fromm.

I did read it fairly early and it had an quite an impact on my life and thinking. It put into words a lot of my discomfort with a life focused on materialistic success. And it was inspiring seeing an intelectual combining so many of the thoughts and topics he developed during his lifetime into one coherent and approachable book.

As far as i understand it, it's not so much that you can't do that anymore but that it's not automatic anymore. You can still let your mind do it's thing, e.g. hop on the thought train and let one thought lead to another. It's more that you choose to do that whereas for most people it just happens (automatically and subconciously)

I'm not sure what you mean by 'statistically' above.

In general you can't say whether a sample size of 2000 will get you within a specific margin of error without additional information. It very much depends e.g. on what the hypothesis you're testing is or what you're trying to estimate.

They seem to have made available almost their complete catalog up to and including 2004: http://link.springer.com/search?showAll=false&facet-content-...

This search yields 110 041 results across all disciplines covered by springer that should be free to download in complete. Only 11 451 books from the same time range are 'preview-only'.

I'm not certain that this is intentional. I haven't found any statement by Springer that they make available all ebooks older than 10 years. Does anyone know more?

I tried locating the paper "Novel Phase of Carbon, Ferromagnetism and Conversion into Diamond" by Jagdish Narayan and Anagh Bhaumik which is given as one of the sources for the artikel and was supposedly published yesterday. I can't find it though :(

The DOI doesn't check out and it's not on the Journal of Applied Physics homepage. Can anyone point me to it?

Meta-Analysis of 209 studies published 2013 in Clinical Psychology Review: "Conclusion: MBT is an effective treatment for a variety of psychological problems, and is especially effective for reducing anxiety, depression, and stress." [1]

[2] is a recent meta-analysis published in the same journal and looking into identifying the underlying mechanisms of mindfulness-based therapy aka how it works: "These findings are largely consistent with the theoretical underpinnings of MBSR and MBCT. Evidence for mindfulness, cognitive reactivity and emotional reactivity as mechanisms support the key theoretical premises underlying MBSR and MBCT that the cultivation of mindfulness skills leads to insight and non-reactive acceptance of one's experience which in turn lead to positive outcomes."

The underlying theory of this course is sound and has been shown to be on a similiar level of effectiveness as other therapies including pharmacological ones. Whether this specific online course (or any online course) is effective i can't comment on.

[1] http://www.verksampsykologi.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/K...

[2] http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kate_Cavanagh/publicatio...

Game Theory 12 years ago

I can recommend the book 'A Course in Game Theory' by Ariel Rubinstein and Martin J. Osborne . You'll probably need some mathematical and economic background knowledge to gain the most out of it. Note that it is more abstract than illustrative though it is aimed at a beginner in Game Theory.

The book ist free to download after a simple registration at http://arielrubinstein.tau.ac.il/books.html

Although noone replied directly Matthias Andree wrote:

"(I have read Eric's folloup to Linus' mail I'm replying to, but not following that one up in AOL style. I second Eric mentioning the "curse of the gifted" from own experience. You start something without design, it succeeds for your talent, experience, whatever, it evolves and grows and eventually disembogues into a rewrite from scratch, that time with a design before the implementation.)"

My guess is that most of them thought Erics Mail too off topic to continue in that direction on the kernel list. I'd like to know what they thought of Erics arguments though. Exspecially Linus opinion at the time would have been interesting ...

Source: https://lkml.org/lkml/2000/8/23/103

direct link to the whitepaper: http://www.oracle.com/us/products/middleware/cloud-app-found...

Oracle argues that open source for military applications would be 1) more expensive and 2) less reliable than commercial software. The whole paper is a rehash of an old oracle whitepaper from 2009 [1]. Ironically both points are refuted by the DoDs own FAQ on Open Source Software [2]. It's noteworthy too, that the DoD has long years of experience using open source software and has published its take away lessons [3].

So what's the reason for Oracle to rehash its old FUD right now and picking a target that obviously knows better?

[1] http://www.oracle.com/us/industries/046045.pdf

[2] http://dodcio.defense.gov/OpenSourceSoftwareFAQ.aspx

[3] http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/FOSS/OTD-lesso...