quantum2022

100% spot on.

Who owns AI-generated code? I would think the 'inventor' of the product the code is producing, since AI's can't invent products.

I built this using Claude. I am not a programmer. I also learned how to use GitHub from Claude so if I messed that up sorry :) This is a calendar to help out my cousin who's a single mother raising two little girls alone. She has trouble balancing all their doctors appointments, dentist appointments, soccer practices, baseball practices, school events, etc. It's supposed to be a calendar that's greyed out to anyone viewing except the owner. Anyone with the web address can update the calendar with whatever event it is. Only the owner (Kimble or if anyone else ever uses it them) would be able to see what the events were and the descriptions. Basically, I was wondering if anyone could review this and see if it's really doing what it should be doing. Also, any ideas on how other people if they wanted to use it could get a free calendar website (or just have them use github for that?) would be appreciated.

Thanks for your time!

I personally hope AI doesn't quite deliver on its valuations, so we don't lose tons of jobs, but instead of a market crash, the money will rotate into quantum and crispr technologies (both soon to be trillion dollar+ industries). People who bet big on AI might lose out some but not be wiped out. That's best casing it though.

Want a product idea? You know the paper bags that you get at the grocery store? Why don't they have coupons/advertising printed on them? Take your groceries home and then cut up the bag for coupons for the next time you shop. I don't think I've ever seen this, and I can't find anything similar in a quick google search. Maybe you could create a business out of that?

I don't think so. I'm pretty sure it was considered an 'act of G-d', not an act of China :)

I think you could also have specific pandemic insurance, and that paid out, but those were rare before Covid.

Yes, maybe what people create with it will be more basic. But is 'good enough' good enough? Will people pay for apps they can create on their own time for free using AI? There will be a huge disruption to the app marketplace unless apps are so much better than an AI could create it's worth the money. So short Apple? :) On the other hand, many, many more people will be creating apps and charging very little for them (because if it's not free or less than the value of my time, I'm building it on my own). This makes things better for everyone, and there'll still be a market for apps. So buy Apple? :)

You're missing the forest for the trees. It speeds up people who don't know how to program 100%. We could see a flourishing of ideas and programs coming out of 'regular' people. The kind of people that approach programmers with the 'I have an idea' and get ignored. Maybe the programs will be basic, but they'll be a template for something better, which then a programmer might say 'I see the value in that idea' and help develop it.

It'll increase incremental developments manyfold. A non-programmer spending a few hours on AI to make their workflow better and easier and faster. This is what everyone here keeps missing. It's not the programmers that should be using AI; it's 'regular' people.

There goes the dream of ai allowing normal people to develop cool stuff. Talk about 'big company' stifles the little man.

Has anyone bothered to read section 2? It explicitly states that anyone the government deems a threat to themselves or others can be put away.

This is neat! I always wondered if there would be a way to 'containerize' tables like this. IE a regular table is like a bulk carrier ship, with everything stuffed into it. If you could better organize it like a container ship, you could carry much more stuff more efficiently (and offload it faster too!)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KleseAAmUKw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9bZkp7q19f0

Sp error: Use Laudspeaker to set up a drip campaing, and personalize messages based on customer attributes

This is fascinating finding out about these communities. My problems were always that I believed time travel might exist. Now I can find out whether I really https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6nnwn5rXEio :)

I found a reddit post about it and I think you may be correct, though it seems like their hallucinations aren't 'full fledged' (they report seeing shadows, not people or what have you): https://www.reddit.com/r/Aphantasia/comments/baf5fv/can_peop...

I also found this study asking a similar question about many different types of mental illnesses, though some of it is about making people that have aphantasia better able to visualize to treat things like PTSD: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9614338/

I wonder if this could be induced in people who suffer from hallucinations to reduce or eliminate their symptoms? Maybe their system is rigged into overdrive the other way. It says on wikipedia that there are 'cases reported of acquired aphantasia'.

Thanks for the kind response. My thought was creating a QR code using shapes in the image. Say a QR code is made up of 1000 shapes. A common theme in art is to draw using shapes. Take the 1000 largest 'shapes' in an image and create the QR code out of that instead of the type of QR codes we have now. On the other end there could be a catalog of what shapes match the video and it narrows down until it matches perfectly. I suppose you could use the QR code not just to link to videos, but to places in space on a maps or other things using a photo instead of a QR code. Again, thanks for your response.

I'm curious of what the fully developed OS will look like for spatial computing if that's what we're calling it now. I think it will have to be built on old methods people are familiar with, like 'clicking' on something with their finger or hand, but I'm fascinated to see when someone is reading the paper newspaper and wants more detail, so they click on the 'link' (ie word/phrase) in the paper and their headset brings up a website with more detail on what they're reading. It could even be older books without any specially marked keywords or anything, as in the physical world would stay exactly the same. Perhaps with people looking at a building and 'clicking' on the building could bring up the tax map or contact info for the building, etc. As time goes by the building would be viewed from all sides, making it a truly 3D model, so you could click on it from any side. An OS on the past with the physical, based on the past with the web, but with the future integrated. I am truly excited to see this built out over the next few years.

Sorry to hijack your comment. You responded to me about a year ago when I was asking about 3D websites when nobody else did and I really appreciate that, so I wanted to thank you even though it's been so long later. Looks like Apple built something similar to what I was thinking with their headset, which I am not too familiar with and haven't gotten to use. To explain some of what I was thinking: when you look at a piece of physical paper you could click on a sentence or word and it would bring up the say definition, or wikipedia page, or on a financial report if you clicked on a line it would bring up the details of the report. Like a website in 3D. I had some other ideas too for desktop integration, but that's not important. Thanks again.

What about people who might talk about personal injuries or mental illnesses that would affect their work? Wouldn't that risk damaging them if it was private information and sold?

Speaking of which, if a person had a mental illness and then started 'seeing ads' everywhere for the illness, could that exacerbate the illness? How would you prove evidence of harm?

Electric cars are already heavily subsidized and not properly taxed.

We live in a capitalist society. The chargers should make enough money to pay for themselves and repairs if there's damage. Or they should pay for insurance.

Do they do this for gas terminals? One got hit by a car near where I work a few weeks back. I doubt the government is paying to replace it; the gas station is. Why aren't ev owners paying for these?

"And hotels hate reservations made over the phone or by email because too many guests never pay a deposit and never show up."

I'm thinking you're from a non-western country, otherwise that would be false; the only wiggle room you gave yourself was 'booking through email' which I don't think even really exists, unless you meant booking through a hotel's website. Hotels take your deposit when you make a reservation over the phone or on their website, and if you book through booking vs the hotel the hotel will lose 15-30% of the room sale.

You have just as many choices when looking for hotels, just look at google or bing. You don't need booking for anything. People rarely just drive up to hotels without checking hotels in the area beforehand on their phone. I'm not familiar with it in developing countries.

Also thank you Fossdd

And there's so many other options for 3D! That's just one.

I worry when people think of the 3D website they think of the 90s era like the movie hackers.

Technology has progressed so far since then, yet nobody has really tried making 3D websites. Websites that integrate with glasses.

WTF was google glass doing? They could have integrated the glasses with websites but no they had to make it work with the real world which is 1000x more difficult.