HN user

pseudosaid

55 karma
Posts1
Comments108
View on HN

this is such a hacker news comment. expounding needlessly. e2e implies encryption at the source and endpoint which entails encryption along all transit paths. its not that deep. if its not encrypted at the source “ring”, then it cant be e2e. I get your semantics but its just a waste, as is my comment here.

no one mentioned recycling. you introduced that. the above poster is simply conflating altering a materials surface to be sticky, with applying a 3rd party compound to achieve tack. its intellectually tacky, and i dont even know what youre doing. youre just leveraging this to bring about a point of your own, which is deserving of being its own parent comment. but in earnest reply, the question I have is in the change in material surface that becomes sticky. How does that become incompatible with current recycling processes if the base material was compatible? I dont know enough chemistry but it seems to me the post-co2-treatment material should break down the same way in an industrial recycling process.

dont be like that. so semantic youre missing the point so you can dote on yourself.

I feel like its pretty obvious they mean an adhesive in the sense of an additional substance or agent. Just because they use a laser to modify the paper structure to effectively become sticky, doesnt detract at all from the goal and point of the title. that no additional products/agent/glues were needed.

absolutely missing the point of it all just to jerk your ego off.

this is so prevalent on HH that it’s normalized and most the cerebral bozos cant read between lines beyond their self righteous vantage.

it wouldnt matter because of the context. It is expected that an embryo grows into a baby that is born. The very delaying of that expectation that denotes the slave label. Preventing the natural progression is a retardation of freedom. Since these embryo units are designed and purpose built, they are no more slave than the native embryo. If these designer embryos have capacity to develop further on their own, then there is an argument and correlation to be made.

tell that to the derivatives market. It should be obvious that the stock market is divorced from actual value. fundamentals are meaningless now, there is zero penalty for failing to deliver securities, and 95% of all retail trades dont even hit lit markets. Price discovery doesnt exist and neither does the concept of a free market. Open your eyes and see that the market is a sham ponzi scheme where siphoning real value out kf the system is its main objective.

ignore those addicted to negativity. for most people, their life is just reducing awareness to fit into their adlib structured arguments to assuage their insecurities. “Im so smart, i can ignore possibilities and unknowns and frame a thought construct that boosts my sense of ego and importance!”

A stereo mix is in fact trivial and roughly assumes a left right speaker arrangement. Software summing is math and is the same across digital audio workstations because math is math. Are there 3 or more microphones? doesnt matter, each mic is a mono input. trying to capture a facsimile of a perceived stereo field? use ORTF mic spacing and hard pan those mono inputs appropriately.

Stereo is just dual mono. its that simple. Summing is just math, its that trivial.

Creating a mix of multiple inputs for a stereo lr output? also completely trivial from a technical standpoint. Hardly trivial from a creative pov, but that isnt what this is about.

being annoyed is a result of all ready being in discomfort and blaming whatever stimuli you can scapegoat to avoid acknowledging your own dis-ease.

walk around with some chronic pain, and see how quick everything annoys you and how self righteous that disapproval is.

More like the unbearable displacement of blame

chicken before the egg. its reasonable to want to use this to ensure proper form before trying to strength train with said form. Every pic on their website shows zero weight or bars being used and there is a focus on getting good form. even if i was pushing weights to near failure, id want to know the second my form start tanking to avoid injury. proprioception alone is not enough to ensure good form until you can develop the awareness to maintain it.

okay semantic santa thank you for gifting us this trite side note. the message was clear and makes sense and youre disregarding that to elevate your preferred modus of communication. do you eat the chaff with your wheat?

its almost as if the roles of habit and cultur influence the way that a human brain makes sense of its stimulus.

i mean i read his tweets. he has flipped his stance. google it. heres an ai summary to give a semblance of proof Criticism of censorship and then censoring content: Musk has criticized what he perceived as censorship by Twitter and other platforms, while also being accused of censoring content on his own platform, X. Promoting free speech and then taking action against accounts: Musk has championed free speech, but has also been criticized for suspending or restricting accounts that he deemed critical of his policies or other figures. Claiming to be a "free speech absolutist" and then engaging in censorship: Musk has stated that he is a "free speech absolutist," but has also been accused of engaging in censorship, particularly regarding content critical of his own actions or those of his companies. Criticizing the UK government and then interacting with UK politicians: Musk has criticized the UK government and its policies, while also interacting with UK politicians on his platform. Criticizing the European Commission and then praising the EU: Musk has criticized the European Commission, while also praising the EU on other occasions. Promoting conspiracy theories and then claiming to be against misinformation: Musk has promoted conspiracy theories, while also claiming to be against misinformation. Criticizing the SEC and then interacting with them: Musk has criticized the SEC, while also interacting with them on his platform. Claiming to be a "non-profit" and then making money from Twitter: Musk claimed to have acquired the "world's largest non-profit" for $44 billion, but Twitter had in fact reported profit in 2018 and 2019.