HN user

pottersbasilisk

32 karma
Posts1
Comments115
View on HN

Interesting read. The consequences of this will be important.

I always thought the balkanization of the internet would occur because of world governments not because of tech leaders personal feelings or corporate influence.

I expect tech leaders to be dragged in front of the senate real soon.

[dead] 9 years ago

James Damore has gained nearly 20k followers on twitter in a few hrs.

50% of googlers disagree with the firing.

Steve Bannon has knives out for google.

A congressman is calling for a senate investigation of google.

Google managers were caught on twitter bragging about personal and cross company blacklists.

This canceling is obvious damage control, the chief officers have some work to do.

[dead] 9 years ago

Its probably because business insider reports roughly 50% disagreed with the firing.

This will only get worse because of the extreme polarization.

Plus Bannon is out for googles blood.

Considering google employees were caught talking about political blacklists on social media, the war is reaching the next level.

The right is talking openly about creating a completely parallel everything. The google memo and response just adds fuel to the fire.

[dead] 9 years ago

Jordan Peterson's influence is growing day by day.

I cant believe how many teens talk about him.

Even at my internship, "cleaning your room" has become inside joke among the tech team.

Im seeing the liberal bubble here.

Here is what trump supporters think(not a trump supporter).

Its only ever been a bankster fraud pushed by goldman sachs

https://quidsapio.wordpress.com/2012/06/06/how-goldman-sachs...

https://green.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/12/goldman-sachs-buy...

https://blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/10/27/street...

http://www.goldmansachs666.com/2009/05/al-gores-carbon-tradi...

These are the core tenents of the Paris Climate Agreement:

(a) Holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels, recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change;

(b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production;

(c) Making finance flows consistent with a pathway towards low greenhouse gas emissions and climate-resilient development.

Translation for the gullible: give us money. for vague stuff. and vague goals. and vague methods that cant accomplish goals because we never want the tax gravy train to end. Nor that even have actual metrics for success so we never have to stop taxing everyone.

plus trust china when they tell you they will also "do stuff" too. even though they lie their ass off about everything

Protip: china pollutes more than DOUBLE the usa. more than usa and europe combined. and while our emissions have declined over the last decade, theirs have exploded