plastic041

I thought too long to find out what a means in a new runtime.

Iku is kinda irregular but it's only itte and itta instead of ite/ita. Also aru/nai is more like antonyms rather than conjugation?

Categorizing Japanese verbs as -ru or -u requires more context.

I prefer the term "group 2 verbs" to "-ru verbs." Group 2 verbs are verbs that end in -eru or -iru, not just -ru. Of course there are some exceptions, like kaeru, which ends in -eru but is actually a -u verb. Conjugation is easy: remove the final -ru and append -masu, -mashita, etc.

"Group 1 verbs" (again, -u verbs) are verbs that are not group 2 verbs. Conjugation is a bit more difficult because the -nu, -bu, -mu, and -u verbs have many suffixes. However, after memorizing these two (-nbmu and -u, because -nu, -bu, and -mu are almost the same), the rest are easy.

There are only two irregular verbs: kuru and suru. Just memorize them.

I learned Japanese by just memorizing. Once you have memorized enough verbs and their conjugations, you can figure out the conjugation of a new verb even if you don't understand how it works.

I think they are made by different people/organizations. Chinese colors is by TOTM Tech, which sells various (pretty obviously vibe coded) design tools and assets. OP doesn't sell anything so I don't think they are related.

MMXXVI

That too. LLMs love to writing year in roman numeral. https://github.com/search?q=%22%C2%B7+MMXXVI%22&type=code There are 2.8k of these in github.

the same color today

Looks liks Chinese colors always show that color in Hero section? It's coincidence I think.

I wanted to check if the information on this page was correct. I started searching and found this site [0], which looks very similar. I thought it was made by the same person, but it's not. It's just another website designed using LLM.

One advantage of LLM is that you can quickly and easily generate a "pretty decent" website. However, there is a drawback, that there is a high chance that a page with a very similar design(and similar idea) already exists somewhere.

[0] https://chinesecoloratlas.com/

People should know that most of the Mac examples shown in the article are regressions that happened in Tahoe.

- Sequoia's Notes had perfect sliding animation.

- Safari's URL bar seemed the same. (Though I think it's more a placement issue, not animation issue. They could just put a placeholder at the end of the bar, not at the center.)

- 'Save as' dialog had a problems with sidebar, but not janky as much as Tahoe's.

- Zooming in preview app worked fine.

Looks clean and works fine, but it needs optimization. Clicking "Type" in the "schema builder" example takes 1~2 seconds to open the popover in the landing page(macbook pro m4). I think its because there are lots of heavy components, but still it's too slow.

Header layout breaks on ipad. haha...

I kind of get that a device named BOMB made the plane turn back.

However, I don't understand this part:

flight attendant told passengers over the PA system that they "must turn off Bluetooth immediately," or else the aircraft would have to turn around.

If there's a BOMB, turning off Bluetooth won't make it much safer. I mean, a turned-off bomb is probably safer than a turned-on bomb, but it's still a bomb.

Pilots: "Phew, BOMB is now turned off. It's absolutely safe to continue flying. Thank you for your cooperation, passengers and terrorist(s)."

Title says

back to writing code by hand

But what they are doing is

doing the __design work__ myself, by hand, before any code gets written.

So... Claude still is generating the code I guess?

And seriously, I can't understand that they thought their vibe coded project works fine and even bought a domain for the project without ever looking at source code it generated, FOR 7 MONTHS??

Seems right. This site uses `React Simple Maps` library with `Natural Earth` map data. Natural earth marks crimea Russian territory[0] in their "default" map data.

[0] https://github.com/nvkelso/natural-earth-vector/issues/391

There was only one small issue: it was written in the programming language and with the library it had been told not to use. This was not hidden from it. It had been documented clearly, repeatedly, and in detail. What a human thing to do.

"Ignoring" instructions is not human thing. It's a bad LLM thing. Or just LLM thing.

It's a little unfair to Figma when its moralless competitor is ignoring every copyright laws.

“Unfortunately, a lot of the internet is manipulation … Everything on the internet is fake. One thing that we always say is all opinions are formed in the TikTok comments,” Chaotic Good co-founder Jesse Coren noted.

Why is this guy talking like this? YOU are literally co-making internet full of fake!

It's worse if you read the context[0]:

Interviewer: What would you say to someone who’s freaked out by these ideas that we are talking about — who feels like they’re being manipulated by artists and marketers online?

Coren: Unfortunately, a lot of the internet is manipulation. Andrew(Chaotic Good co-founder) would always say everything on the internet is fake. All opinions are formed in the TikTok comments — which is a reminder to us of what we can help with. I don’t know if this will make anyone feel better, but a lot of what we do on the narrative side is controlling the discourse. Most people see a video or something about an album that came out, and that first comment they see becomes their opinion, even when they haven’t heard the whole album. It’s really important for us to make sure we’re ahead of it and controlling that narrative in the direction we want.

[0] https://www.billboard.com/pro/digital-marketers-secret-tacti...

Prompt in the second video: "Reduce the font and tagline length"

Now we are using LLM just to adjust font size?

Also third video: "Generate an image for the hero section..."

I can't understand why OpenAI(or Google, or whatever AI companies) thinks it's okay to put an AI generated image for product description. It's literally fake.

Correcting my mistakes isn't mean but...

In the quantum multiverse which contains all physically realizable possibilities, that isn't one of them.

Or

See how that works?

These are. You can be sarcastic as much as you want to be but I can't?

And again, I really don't understand why are you so mean about this. I read some of your other comments and many of them are unnecessarily mean. Please be nice.

Well, at least their PM thinks(or argue ) it's a tip[0]. Also it's pretty obvious I was just being sarcastic about MS's behaviors. I don't know why you are so mean but please don't be. Have a nice day.

[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47573233

I wanted to say that they are same because they are "copilot-written self promotions", but I get your point.

Also I found this: https://github.com/Laravel-Backpack/medialibrary-uploaders/p... it seems like copilot added an ad on behalf of the user at Nov 2025(see last edit).

company with a $2.65 trillion market cap and an army of marketing professionals

That's one reason I think they would argue it's not an ad. Another reasons are "recommendations" and "tips" and "suggestions" in my windows.

semantic trick

That's what I wanted to say! Thank you.

It still would be a self promoting, which is still an ad.

I do think it's just an ad. Also it's a bad kind of one because 1) it disguises itself as a tip 2) makes people to think if it's an ad for Raycast or other services, when actually it's just promoting itself.

This "ad" is not exactly new. Looks like MS thinks it's a "tip" rather than an ad. I don't know if Raycast team even knows about this.

https://github.com/PlagueHO/plagueho.github.io/pull/24#issue... Copilot has been adding "(emoji) (tip)" thing since May 2025. GitHub copilot was released in May 2025, so basically it has had an ad since beginning.

There are 1.5m of these things in GitHub. https://github.com/search?q=%22%3C%21--+START+COPILOT+CODING...

Here are some of them:

https://github.com/johannesPP/FS-Calculator/pull/2

Connect Copilot coding agent with Jira, Azure Boards or Linear to delegate work to Copilot in one click without leaving your project management tool.

https://github.com/sharthomas645-tech/HybridAI-Next-React-Vi...

Send tasks to Copilot coding agent from Slack and Teams to turn conversations into code. Copilot posts an update in your thread when it's finished.

Looks like MS really want to "give tips" about their new integrations.

edit: I think it's an ad too. Everyone would think so, except for MS.

This is FIM(fill in the middle) + comments with extra "compile" step.

How can people believe that you are respecting bot detection in production when your software's README says it can "Avoid detection with built-in anti-bot patches"?

robots.txt is the most basic access restrictions and it doesn't even read it, while faking itself as human[0]. It is about bypassing access restrictions.

[0] https://github.com/lightfeed/extractor/blob/d11060269e65459e...

Avoid detection with built-in anti-bot patches and proxy configuration for reliable web scraping.

And it doesn't care about robots.txt.

This isn’t a generic chatbot. It’s a custom-built voice agent that answers his phone, knows his exact prices, his hours, his policies, and can collect a callback when it doesn’t know something.

This is 2026's most generic chatbot.

I wanted to know how to make softwares with LLM "without losing the benefit of knowing how the entire system works" and "intimately familiar with each project’s architecture and inner workings", while "have never even read most of their code". (Because obviously, you can't.) But OP didn't explain that.

You tell LLM to create something, and then use another LLM to review it. It might make the result safer, but it doesn't mean that YOU understand the architecture. No one does.

Since my main goal was to learn, I decided to do it "the right way". This means I didn’t want to rely on Replit or Lovable where the infra part is obfuscated. I wanted to deal with that complexity myself.

I expected OP to actually 'learn' devops, but what they did was just asking LLMs to do everything.

Also...

180+ paid $2 for a dino

People pays $2 for an image of dinosaur with human face?