HN user

pimentel

132 karma

I'm an Electrical and Computer Engineer, focused on software development for the web, as well as for computer vision and machine learning.

Interested in entrepreneurship, always seeking to learn how to build better software.

Posts4
Comments81
View on HN

Exactly. The best place to hide from the US is staying in a country who won't quickly deliver you to the US with just a fingersnap, like a good dog. Like any EU country would. Even if that means a not so free country.

I just saw Memento last night (for the first time), so reading the article felt like an incredible coincidence.

All the stories I know and heard of stroke victims in their 30's or 40's make me think and ask: is there really a way to prevent or predict a stroke?

Would the "controversial routine full body scan" help? Specially to people who have a parent being an early stroke victim?

These things are scary as hell...

"You don't have architects who draw UMLs for you"

You better not, who cares about UML diagrams?

But startup code doesn't have to be messy. I don't write messier code (to be used in a company that pays me), just because I'm in a hurry, and neither should anyone.

Zelda De-make 12 years ago

This has been awesome. Thanks! I was kinda disappointed that I didn't need to get to Death Mountain after getting the 8 pieces. A 1-pixel Ganon would be cool!

Whenever I see rich guys forfeiting on more money so they can help the poor, I remember this: http://lesswrong.com/lw/3gj/efficient_charity_do_unto_others...

TL;DR:

If a high-powered lawyer who makes $1,000 an hour chooses to take an hour off to help clean up litter on the beach, he's wasted the opportunity to work overtime that day, make $1,000, donate to a charity that will hire a hundred poor people for $10/hour to clean up litter, and end up with a hundred times more litter removed. If he went to the beach because he wanted the sunlight and the fresh air and the warm feeling of personally contributing to something, that's fine. If he actually wanted to help people by beautifying the beach, he's chosen an objectively wrong way to go about it. And if he wanted to help people, period, he's chosen a very wrong way to go about it, since that $1,000 could save two people from malaria. Unless the litter he removed is really worth more than two people's lives to him, he's erring even according to his own value system.

If he feels it's unfair that he makes so much more many than others, he should make even more and give out what he think is enough to make it fair.

Project Euler 13 years ago

I saw that and just registered/tried.

Although it has Clojure (my target language), you still send code instead of an answer, and you get problems like not knowing what's available in terms of libs and whatnot.

Project Euler 13 years ago

I liked the sound of leetcode, but I see the way to answer is with code (C++/Java) instead of a value answer. That ruins it for me.

I want to play with new programming languages, and see if the output is correct while I'm at it.

Every (serious) company prohibits it's employees from disclosing secret information, be it Linkedin or by phone, and even verbally with your friends. That doesn't mean it's forbidden to use Linkedin, make phone calls, or talk to people.

I was expecting "the ability to focus". You can have the greatest programming skills, but if you can't focus in doing what you need to do, it won't get done when it needs to.

And then you would have to trust app approval to a government entity. "Oh what's that, some encryption tool for secure communications? Not gonna happen." You would have lobbying from the big corps to have advantage over indie developers. And all those other things that happen every single time the government messes with private matters.

Regulation rarely targets the real problem. It targets a problem, creating another one.

For Django apps, just create an admin staff user with permission only to see the User model. Better, make it read all models.

Maybe autoreply to any email from the NSA with credentials for an automatically just created NSA user.

Or maybe a viral picture of a misogynist with the company tshirt would be motivational enough for the company to fire him (maybe summed to other things in him the company didn't like, who knows). Is he really a misogynist jerk? Does not matter: the picture was published to twitter with that message implied.

EDIT: I'm not saying he's a misogynist, in fact I think otherwise. What I'm saying is if she implies he is with a photo attached, he can easily be seen as one.

Honestly (and maybe obviously) I just mentioned "holocaust" because of the "not axis of evil -evil". Of course a bully is not comparable to a genocidal regime...

But a moronic teenager potentially messing with another teenagers lives forever (Amanda Todd like), in a systematic and industrialized manner, just for laughs or some sociopath self-power acertion (not for science, not for profit, not for educational purposes) kinda reminds some nazi pseudo-doctor from the holocaust.

What about peeping plus mind torture, bullying, public humiliation, blackmail,...

The (exclusively) peepers are probably just teenagers. The evil ones are those who don't do it for quick, funny sexual purposes.

The evil ones are those who do it for the fun of torturing the "slaves". The evil ones are those who use the collected material for profit (or silly cyber-cred) at the expense of a young girl's mind.

What about discovering that you, a young girl, have been seen naked on your webcam? Can you imagine what that can do to the mind of a child/young adult? Imagine all the troubles that can bring to a human mind, and imagine if that mind can already be a little troubled.

I say pure evil. Like holocaust evil, just at a smaller scale.