phonon

Codex context limit is 400k total, including 128,000 reserved output tokens.

Global Foundries has lots of fabs with 10 year old+ processes....

M3 Ultra has a 1024 bit memory bus (819 GB/s) and starts at $3,999 (96GB of RAM). It can be done....

How does it compare to https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48436863 ?

Ticket quotas.

Use EMV 3DS 2.x authentication with liability shift protection?

"... this flying wing will burn 50% less fuel than today's jets..."[1]

[1]https://time.com/7292452/jetzero-low-carbon-air-travel/

It would depend on exactly how the records were obtained. If hypothetically she paid a nurse $100 for it (and had done so many times in the past), that could be criminally liable. In practice, no-one would prosecute over a single x-ray. But when a reporter gets legally protected medical information "somehow", an insinuation that a legal violation took place at some point to effect that is not unreasonable.

If you induce someone to violate HIPAA who is covered by it (like say a nurse at a hospital), you can be criminally liable. There is no carve-out for journalists. BOTH the person who gave the record and the person who induced them to give it could be liable (not in the same way, possibly). In any case, you seemed to think there was a bright line rule of some sort, that "At one point it accuses Lim of "violating HIPAA", which is not a thing† (HIPAA constrains covered entities, not reporters)." when in fact you can be criminally liable for inducement/conspiracy etc if you induce someone who is covered to give you those records, under https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1320d-6

Here is another similar case of a non-medical person violating HIPAA.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-wdtn/pr/memphis-man-sentenced-c...

Take the L :-)

A. That's how I read it too. B. You can be criminally liable for HIPAA violations, if you induce someone covered by them to violate them. See for example https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/media/1254226/dl (indictment of KEITH RITSON)

"COUNT 2 (Conspiracy to Wrongfully Obtain and Disclose Individually Identifiable Health Information) 19. Paragraphs 1-3 and 5-18 of Count 1 of this Superseding Information are hereby realleged and incorporated as though set forth in full herein. 20. At all times relevant to this Superseding Information: a. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) protects individually identifiable health information from wrongful disclosure or obtainment and seeks to set national standards to maintain patient confidentiality. b. In connection with HIPAA, the United States Department of Health and Human Services enacted regulations to safeguard the privacy of patients’ medical records and limit circumstances in which individually identifiable health information or protected health information can be used or disclosed. The HIPAA law and privacy regulations apply to, among others, health care providers, such as medical doctors, who transmit health information in connection with a transaction covered by the law and privacy regulations. c. Frank Alario, who is listed as a co-conspirator with respect to Count 2 of this Superseding Information but not as a defendant herein, was a health care provider and a covered entity under the HIPAA law and privacy regulations.

21. From in or about August 2014 through in or about February 2016, in the District of New Jersey, and elsewhere, defendant KEITH RITSON did knowingly and intentionally conspire and agree with Frank Alario and others to commit offenses against the United States, that is, to knowingly and without authorization obtain individually identifiable health information and protected health information to another person, and to knowingly and without authorization disclose individually identifiable health information and protected health information maintained by a covered entity relating to individuals, contrary to Title 42, United States Code, Section 1320d-6."

https://www.codereviewbench.com/

https://codereview.withmartian.com/

When it's ICE it's both :-(

That's coming out in https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-crescent-island by around the end of the year.

Microsoft has https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2026/01/26/maia-200-the-ai-... already.

Acetylcysteine

That's NAC (N-acetylcysteine, C5H9NO3S), mentioned in the article many times.

4 DIMMS =/= 4 channels

Because Cerebras handles large models poorly due to latency/bandwidth issues to main memory. See https://openai.com/index/introducing-gpt-5-3-codex-spark/ where its performance is significantly below that of the regular Codex 5.3, and can only handle a 128k text context window. For some use cases its great, but most would rather use a better, slower model.

In the future, they plan hybrid implementations, to be able to serve large models better, e.g.

"AWS. We signed a binding term sheet with Amazon Web Services for AWS to become the first hyperscaler to deploy Cerebras systems in its data centers. Deployment in AWS data centers will require us to meet strict standards for performance, scale, and reliability.Pursuant to the term sheet, we will create a co-designed, disaggregated inference-serving solution that will integrate AWS Trainium3 chips with Cerebras CS-3 systems, connected via high-bandwidth networking, to partition inference workloads across Trainium3 and CS-3. Each system will perform the type of computation at which it most excels. The approach is expected to deliver 5 times more token throughput in the same hardware footprint, at up to 15 times faster speeds compared to leading GPU-based solutions as benchmarked on leading open-source models."

Pat has been on record many times that he was against dividends but the board declared them anyway.

Isn't that just 2x supersampling? If you want "perfect" antialiasing that's the minimum you need, no?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Fleischer_(judge)

So that is not correct workaround at all for AGPL licenses. By moving the MuPDF logic into a Web Worker, you are still providing a "modified version" of the program to the user to interact with. The "separation" via a Web Worker does not change the fact that the user is interacting with a system that includes AGPL-licensed code.

Are you kidding? He had extremely sensitive roles as Devin Nunes' House committee aide from 2017–2019 in the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, National Security Council aide and deputy director of national intelligence (2019–2020), and then Chief of staff to the secretary of defense (2020–2021).

https://github.com/zaphar/sheetsui

SpaceX originally partnered with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Wyler and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutelsat_OneWeb in 2014, then they eventually went their separate ways.

https://x.com/greg_wyler/status/1116101020675977218

Well, you can always use a Fujitsu A64FX...let me check eBay.. :-)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5fXrPMGM5E From a former senior employee at American Express.

Not according to the 5th Circuit, sadly....

"The majority stakes the largest detention initiative in American history on the possibility that ‘seeking admission’ is like being an ‘applicant for admission,’ in a statute that has never been applied in this way, based on little more than an apparent conviction that Congress must have wanted these noncitizens detained — some of them the spouses, mothers, fathers, and grandparents of American citizens,” she added. “Straining at a gnat, the majority swallows a camel.”

https://www.courthousenews.com/fifth-circuit-upholds-trump-a...

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/66831340/mobley-v-workd...

Derive is more sophisticated. TI-89/92/Nspire is close though.

Yes, I've found the more financially motivated doctors in the higher end "concierge" type centers are not as skilled or experienced or overall motivated as the ones who seek out the patients with difficult cases at government reimbursement rates. The irony...