Sure. You're a useless cunt and when you die it will massively improve the life of everyone you know.
Welcome to the truth my friend.
HN user
Sure. You're a useless cunt and when you die it will massively improve the life of everyone you know.
Welcome to the truth my friend.
You mean people like you? Or are you working there for minimum wage?
No, the price was rising well before any of the "whales" came in. You're just writing a narrative that suits your existing preconceptions.
Yes, that's true. I guess I don't oppose it because I don't care. But I certainly know many developers whore highly concerned about their pay.
By learning what they are. It's not that difficult. A pyramid scheme of any sort requires new participants continually. Crypto currency does not.
Everyone having information is called "universal education". It's not a bad thing.
Actually, it wouldn't need to be that long. The circumference of the moon is 40k kilometres, so assuming the site was in the center of the far side (though there's no reason it needs to be), that would put it at ~10,000 km from sight of the earth.
That's shorter than some transatlantic cables. I reckon it would be doable.
Or a long cable...
5078dc16f05cc325c8f8804f68e20feac85bea84
Would like to know this too.
There isn't any for mine; it's included with the house.
Vague bet. What does "worth nothing" mean? Obviously collectibles will be worth something and even crappy cars will have scrap value.
Have you genuinely never seen people refer to, say, $10k to mean ten thousand dollars? It's very common.
That's fair enough. I didn't grow up in an ideal environment, but I also did have enough encouragement to end up where I am today.
How do I know that two objects are either receding or approaching? Because it's obvious. Think about it yourself.
Edit: ah, wait, your theory says that approaching objects look the same as receding ones. I think you need to justify that.
Don't criticize your parents for not knowing as much as you do. I'm sure they hoped that would be the case.
Wow. Although there are elements I disagree with, that said is a very well argued and explained point.
I suspect there are few here that will read through it though. Might be better as a blog.
Galaxies are either approaching or receding from our perspective. How could they possibly be stuck in some "place"? Your theory makes no sense.
Well...
Carrots were naturally white. They were bred to be orange for reasons you can Google.
Indeed, not an insightful comment at all. Everyone knows that.
That's completely wrong I'm afraid. In terms of popularity (number of fans) Rugby is about as popular as American Football, at around 9th most popular sport.
The top two are 1. Association Football (aka soccer), 2. Cricket
Boxing doesn't make the top 10.
Ok, I didn't realize anyone would really think that only legal documents could be used in court. It seems an utterly bizarre idea to me.
Did you think that an eyewitness account of a murder would be inadmissible because it's not a legal document?
That's just nonsense. There is absolutely no need for UK cattle to be fed soya-based feeds and if finishing lots have recently started using them, it's for a minor percentage increase which might be financially worthwhile but certainly isn't a requirement.
Yes, that is what it says. Not "cannot be used in court". Just that they consider the English version authoritative.
Are you trying to tell me you can't tell the difference between these statements?
Well where droptablemain thinks you're being ridiculous, I would argue the opposite: that's what we already have. We call these state trained professionals "teachers" and pretend they're just educating the children, but I think lockdown has revealed just how many people are dependent on the child minding aspect of schools.
Sometimes it pays to be irrational.
By "balanced electrolyte consumption" you mean chemicals such as sodium, right? I'll give you a moment to think about that...
Now? You've clearly never heard of the 1518 Dance Plague: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dancing_plague_of_1518
That is literally the opposite of how scientific hypotheses start.
I'm guessing you're not a scientist.
Well, firstly you have a fence-post error: 2002-2012 is eleven data points. So, lets reverse your methodology. Let's look at 2002-2010 and then 2010-2020.
Now we see that in fact the trend is accelerating. I think that answers your question.