HN user

pfarnsworth

3,341 karma
Posts24
Comments1,208
View on HN
foreignpolicy.com 7y ago

Why Young Koreans Love to Splurge

pfarnsworth
1pts0
www.bbc.com 7y ago

Are the Super-Rich Ruining Burning Man?

pfarnsworth
1pts1
www.cnbc.com 7y ago

I Spent a Day with a Full-Time Uber, Lyft and Juno Driver in NYC

pfarnsworth
1pts0
www.consumerreports.org 7y ago

How to Delete Your Data from 23andMe, Ancestry, and Other Sites

pfarnsworth
32pts5
www.cnbc.com 7y ago

The $35B race to cure a silent killer that affects 30M Americans

pfarnsworth
1pts0
www.theverge.com 7y ago

These faces show how far AI image generation has advanced in just four years

pfarnsworth
5pts0
www.fastcompany.com 7y ago

How Cheerios and Quaker Oats responded to glyphosate in cereal reports

pfarnsworth
5pts0
www.inc.com 8y ago

The Uncomfortable Truth About Entrepreneurship That Nobody Wants to Talk About

pfarnsworth
6pts1
newrepublic.com 8y ago

The Real Retail Killer: Private Equity

pfarnsworth
5pts0
www.wired.com 8y ago

Beware of Roboadvisors Bearing Low Fees

pfarnsworth
3pts0
news.morningstar.com 8y ago

Uber Agrees in Principle to Exit Southeast Asia for Stake in Rival

pfarnsworth
2pts0
gizmodo.com 8y ago

The Mess at Meetup

pfarnsworth
2pts0
www.telegraph.co.uk 8y ago

'Safer' 20mph zones raises number of road deaths but too costly to reverse

pfarnsworth
3pts0
www.youtube.com 8y ago

Why the cops won't help you when you're getting stabbed

pfarnsworth
49pts7
www.bloomberg.com 9y ago

Most Waymo Patent Claims Dropped in Autonomous Car Fight with Uber

pfarnsworth
162pts107
www.sfchronicle.com 9y ago

Despite money and effort, homelessness in SF as bad as ever

pfarnsworth
3pts1
www.latimes.com 9y ago

Minimum wage fight may heat up after new study finds jobs, hours fell in Seattle

pfarnsworth
3pts0
www.scribd.com 9y ago

Waymo Uber Injunction

pfarnsworth
2pts0
jalopnik.com 9y ago

Lyft is not a 'better boyfriend'

pfarnsworth
3pts0
www.cbc.ca 9y ago

New rules for flying recreational drones in Canada revealed

pfarnsworth
3pts4
news.ycombinator.com 9y ago

Ask HN: Why is editing a large file still slow in 2017?

pfarnsworth
7pts3
www.theverge.com 9y ago

Uber just streamlined the hell out of its app

pfarnsworth
4pts0
blog.sfgate.com 9y ago

Nearly 90% of San Franciscans cannot afford a median-priced home in the city

pfarnsworth
88pts59
www.scientificamerican.com 10y ago

Did Global Warming Slow Down in the 2000s, or Not?

pfarnsworth
4pts0

I love how it's turn-based. Everything is purposeful and strategic with football. Whereas games like hockey and basketball are very fluid, the strategy is more vague. There's a general sense of what you want to do, but it depends on a lot of factors. You could technically have a player deke between every player and score a goal or basket, but that would essentially be impossible in football.

With football, it's a reset every down, and everyone is ready, so the strategy is critical.

There is so much beauty in the game of football.

It's filled with the best athletes colleges can produce for that particular sport. The worst football player on any NFL team is probably better than the best football players from the college that he attended for the previous few years.

One thing people don't realize is that these athletes are running as fast as they possibly can, especially the wide receivers. That means the cornerbacks/defenders are running as fast as they can as well. When there's any sort of separation between the wide receiver and the cornerback, that is extremely dangerous. That separation can't be made up, because they're already running as fast as they can. That means separation is an opportunity to target the wide receiver. When the quarterback throws a football with a window of a few feet to a wide receiver 40 yards away, it's simply beautiful.

There is a perfect balance between offense and defense, and there are always trade offs. Both offense and defense are looking for mismatches. Thus, if you have a wide receiver that is faster than cornerback covering him, then you have a mismatch that will be taken advantage of with impunity. So instead, you need to double-cover him with a safety playing up high. But then that leaves one of their offensive players poorly covered. How do you make up for that? You blitz with an oversized number of defenders so that you give the quarterback less time to find an open man. Or, if you have a mismatch on your defensive line, and they outmatch the protection for the quarterback, then that also gives the quarterback less time to make a play.

So you can counter that by bringing your running back or tight end to provide extra blocking. But then that limits the number of targets you can have.

There's just a long list of pros and cons to this game which makes it utterly fascinating. The players live and breathe all of this stuff.

I scan my Airbnbs with my thermal camera to try to find hidden cameras. I'm pleased to say I've never found one yet.

If you pay at the higher end of rates and go with Superhosts, your experience will largely be flawless. I've never had a problem and my stays have been amazing, but I'm also spending hotel-equivalent prices or higher.

This is incorrect. There needs to be large investors willing to buy at $140 in order to say the CFO failed. There likely wasn't.

You can't compare the actions of "smart money" like Fidelity, etc to a small investor swept up in the speculative mania and buying 50 shares at $140. Those are the ones propping up the prices until the big money deems it safe enough to buy large volumes.

The reaction of the markets to Airbnb's IPO is definitely an echo of the dotcom days.

The only question is, is Airbnb's IPO equivalent to Netscape (ie. near the beginning of the boom) or Pets.com (near the end). Only time will tell I suppose.

The software quality of Apple is embarrassing. They have the money to hire the best of the best, and to do tons of manual QA yet their OS releases are always riddled with errors. Why is software the red-headed step-child of Apple?

Anyone who thinks this isn't a cost-cutting measure is delusional or utterly naive. This is strictly a bottom-line measure and they are draping it as a phony environmental move. Their profit margins are fat enough to afford a $5 charger, they just want to keep boosting their stock price.

What about that statement is anti-transgender? If anything it sounds like he is anti-transgender-extreme-activist. You can put me in that camp as well, I despise those that want to politicize innocent people for their own power.

And I fully support transgender rights, my high school friend's son in transgender from age 5 so I've seen this first hand especially during the most formative years.

The FTC should look into Musk's statements about self-driving, how it's almost done, etc. All that does is trick Tesla owners into paying for the $8000 upgrade for a product that will never, ever come, guaranteed. It just won't happen and he keeps peddling the product like it's only a year away, for the last several years. It's outright fraud and he should be taken to task for it. And for the record, I'm a Tesla-owner.

I'm not sure how long you think it takes to repopulate a forest, but 20 years isn't a very long time. As a human, with a lifespan of 80 years, it might seem long but to nature it's just a drop in a bucket. I'm pretty confident that the forest will regrow, just not in a time frame convenient for you. And from your picture you can clearly see that the forest is regrowing.

No, this is simply not true. There's nothing special about these "modern" fires. Some people like to think that it's different because we're around to see things, but we're not. 1000 year old trees are nothing compared to geological age. Most importantly, you have no idea how hot "ancient" fires burned so how could you possibly compare them to today?

If you're expecting that within a couple of years there's no new growth in Big Basin, and that it will remain some sort of dead desert, then you're sorely mistaken.

It's a terrible tragedy, but forests recover very quickly after forest fires. Although we as humans hate seeing such beautiful places get destroyed, it's a perfectly natural part of history and without these types of fires, we don't get a proper cycle of nature.

No he didn't, he said no such thing.

If you listen to the video, all he did was say he knows nothing about the issues, but he'll "look into it." That's his standard line. He wasn't actually saying he was considering it at all. Honestly, I don't think he would really have any intention to pardon Snowden. It gains him no points with the left, and would damage him with his base supporters. That's probably why the media reported it, to try to get his supporters upset at him.

It's the same thing with the whole manufactured outrage of Kamala Harris and the question posed to him by the reporter. Trump didn't even mention Harris, and the reporter brought it up and asked him whether he heard about the report. Trump said that he knew nothing about it, and he would have assumed that the Democrats would have already validated Harris' eligibility, but he would "look into it." He never even made a point about it, it was obvious it was a non-issue to him. It's a meaningless statement that the media tries to use to make him look bad, and meanwhile it just lets his supporters keep saying that the media lies, which is true when they bend the truth like they do.

When I was in high school, I was at school camping event and we were playing tag in the woods. I ran down a slope and tripped, and fell chest first onto a log, right on my sternum. I was uninjured, but since then I've always thought, "what if there were a broken tree branch right there, it would have punctured my heart and I would have died very quickly." I'm almost 50 now, so we're talking over 30 years I've been thinking about that tree log and the branch stub that could have killed me.

Considering how expensive college is in the US, I'm actively considering alternate options for my kids. It doesn't make sense to turn them into debt slaves and get into hundreds of thousands in debt just to get a job.

Right, that doesn't sound like much of a benefit to me, it sounds like a negatives. I don't think the best caliber engineers would take an offer like this, this sounds like, as I said, an option for unemployed engineers or desperate ones.

Especially in this environment, it could be weeks or months before the next C2H, especially with so many more engineers being laid off. There could be a ton of people competing for a single job.

Also, negotiated a higher salary when THEY hold the cards because now you need to find a new job? That's insane.

No, it wasn't missed. What happened was that doctors thought that steroids would suppress the immune system, and that is not what they wanted at the time. My wife is asthmatic, and she was warned not to use her daily inhaler because it was a steroid.

Now, the belief is that the cytokine storm is what we want to avoid, and by suppressing the immune system, we can avoid it. So the original conclusion was completely wrong, but that's what happens when you have a new virus. Everyone thought this was a respiratory disease, but now it's looking more like a blood disease.