pasxizeis

As a means to learn about both WebAssembly and Rust, I started writing a WebAssembly binary decoder (i.e. a parser for `.wasm` files) from scratch.

Recently it hit v3 spec conformance. (I'm executing the upstream spec test suite.)

I don't plan to make it a highly-performant decoder for use in production environments, but rather one that can be used for educational purposes, easy to read and/or debugging issues with modules. That's why I decided not to offer a streaming API, and why I'll be focusing on things like good errors, good code docs etc.

https://github.com/agis/wadec

P.S. I'm new to the language so any feedback is more than welcome.

I followed the same testing approach when writing a Wasm binary parser (technically, a decoder)[0].

It was pretty helpful having the official spec suite available and a major boost of confidence that your parser is compliant.

Nevertheless, it was my own tests that found a regression in the latest published version of the spec[1], which shows how important it is to have a variety of implementations.

[0] https://github.com/agis/wadec

[1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/issues/2066

Tangential: I decided to write a Wasm parser (more precisely, a decoder the the Wasm binary format) from scratch, as a means to learn both Wasm and Rust[0].

It was the first time I was writing this sort of thing, but I found the spec very clear and well-written.

Fun fact: I was surprised when the test from a toy parser surfaced a real regression in version 3 of the spec[1], released roughly 4 months before.

[0] https://github.com/agis/wadec

[1] https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/issues/2066

Slowly but steadily implementing support for version 3 of the Wasm specification in my wasm parser (written from scratch): https://github.com/agis/wadec

Writing a WebAssembly module parser from scratch, focusing on good diagnostics/errors and DX.

Currently it's fully-conformant to v2.0 of the spec, while I'm working towards implementing the recently released 3.0 version.

https://github.com/agis/wadec

I started learning Rust more actively and then WebAssembly, via building https://github.com/agis/wadec.

I plan to continue doing that in 2026.

Happy new year from Greece!

I plan to continue building the hobby project I started (a Wasm module parser[1]) by implementing version 3 of the WebAssembly specification and eventually implementing the Validation phase.

[1] https://github.com/agis/wadec

I'd say jump straight to the specification (maybe v2, which is simpler).

But I occasionally saw one or two articles around where they explain how the binary format works, which could be a good introduction before jumping to the spec.

As a means to learn about both WebAssembly and Rust, I started writing a WebAssembly binary decoder (i.e. a parser for `.wasm` files) from scratch.

Recently it hit v2.0 spec conformance. 3.0 is next on the roadmap. (I'm executing it against the upstream spec test suite.)

I don't plan to make it a highly-performant decoder for use in production environments, but rather one that can be used for educational purposes, easy to read and/or debugging issues with modules. That's why I decided not to offer a streaming API, and why I'll be focusing on things like good errors, good code docs etc.

https://github.com/agis/wadec

P.S. I'm new to the language so any feedback is more than welcome.

Really happy to see Pat keeping it up! His first Ruby under a Microscope book but also his blog posts are amazing and a major source of inspiration for me. I did meet him personally in a Euruko conference. Such a great person.

As a means to learn about both WebAssembly and Rust, I started writing a WebAssembly binary decoder (i.e. a parser for `.wasm` files) from scratch.

Recently it hit v2.0 spec conformance. 3.0 is next on the roadmap. (I'm executing it against the upstream spec test suite.)

My aim is probably not for it to become a highly-performant decoder for use in production environments, but rather one that can be used for educational purposes and/or debugging issues with existing modules. That's why I decided not to offer a streaming API, and why I'll be focusing on things like good errors, good code docs etc.

https://github.com/agis/wadec

P.S. I'm new to the language so any feedback is more than welcome.

As a Rust newbie and seasoned Go dev, I'm pretty interested to knownwhere would people experienced in both OCaml and Haskell, would put it in the spectrum.

Amazing work!

Where would you suggest someone to start if they wanted to get familiar with the codebase?

Also, what are the next steps for the project?

As a means to get into WebAssembly, I started writing a WebAssembly binary decoder (i.e. a parser for `.wasm` files) from scratch.

Recently I started executing the upstream spec tests against it, as a means to increase spec conformance. It's non-streaming, which is a non-starter for many use cases, but I'm hoping to provide a streaming API later down the road. Also, the errors interface are still very much WIP.

All that said, it's getting close to a fully-conformant one and it's been a really fun project.

https://github.com/agis/wadec

P.S. I'm new to the language so any feedback is more than welcome.

Started writing a WebAssembly binary decoder, as a means to learn both more about wasm and Rust: https://github.com/agis/wadec.

A CLI tool to make reasoning about Postgres locks a bit easier.

Given a database[1] and a set of DDL statements/migrations you want to check, pglockanalyze will open a transaction, execute the statements, read the pg_locks view to analyze the locks they acquire and rollback (or commit, depending on the flags you passed) the transaction. Then, it will output the results for each statement.

I think there's merit in this idea, that said it's very much an experiment so there could be flaws and/or corner cases that this strategy won't work well for.

It's meant to act as a complement, not a replacement, to things like static analysis and the official Postgres docs.

https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

[1] typically an ephemeral database spawned by your CI pipeline

A CLI tool to make reasoning about Postgres locks a bit easier.

Given a database[1] and a set of DDL statements/migrations you want to check, pglockanalyze will open a transaction, execute the statements, read the pg_locks view to analyze the locks they acquire and rollback (or commit, depending on the flags you passed) the transaction. Then, it will output the results for each statement.

I think there's merit in this idea, that said it's very much an experiment so there could be flaws and/or corner cases that this strategy won't work well for.

It's meant to act as a complement, not a replacement, to things like static analysis and the official Postgres docs.

https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

[1] typically an ephemeral database spawned by your CI pipeline

A "Postgres lock diagnostics" tool for migrations. We've been bitten a few times, by seemingly innocent migrations that ended up acquiring locks we did not expect (yes, RTFM).

So I thought: what if, when you opened the PR, you had a tool that actually executed your migrations, saw what locks they acquired (in runtime) and then reported it as a comment to your PR? This would provide you with yet another data point you could use to reason about whether your migration is safe to deploy or not. For example:

    ALTER TABLE users ADD COLUMN email TEXT:
      acquired AccessExclusiveLock on relation `users`

It's in early-stage and very much a PoC yet, but I think there's merit in the idea.

https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

P.S. Also, an excuse to learn Rust - so any feedback from Rust ppl more than welcome

Shameless plug: I wrote a tool[1] that executes a given migration against a test database (e.g. in your CI) and reports back what locks it acquired.

The rationale being to have a "lock diagnostics report" commented in your PR's migration file.

It's a prototype and has a few rough edges and missing functionality, but feedback is more than welcome.

[1] https://github.com/agis/pglockanalyze

Not sure what happened here, but this track[1] at around the 55th second, is suddenly (and unexpectedly) cut off and another, totally unrelated (different artist, different genre) starts playing. The original track is from a Greek hardcore hip-hop group.

First time encountering this in a streaming platform so I found it interesting to share.

[1] https://open.spotify.com/track/4YPTB10Kzq7TMPrL5qHFVk?si=B8i...

Almost a year and a half later, after leaving that job, I took the pandemic to really focus on my stress levels and be happier (I am).

Do you mind sharing any particular advice on how to do this?

I think OP is talking about long-term holders while you are talking about traders.

Congrats Mpampis! Looks awesome!

I guess it all boils down to the network effect of the Bitcoin network. It's the first mover advantage at play.

If you're looking for tactics trainer (and free!), there's no better one than ChessTempo.com.

What do people use to provision their Raspberries? Ansible or something?

This. Demand for drugs was, and I imagine will always be huge.

Thanks for the suggestions, we'll improve the documentation soon.

Correct. It might sound obvious to some, but if you're an organization from the Rails 0.x era (~2011) you have a lot of legacy code and infrastructure that albeit not fancy new tech, it works.