pants2

Right - one would assume that if they're on the verge of an ASI that will consume the entire economy, advertising is only a distraction.

Perhaps with strategic striping on the ball they could also get angular velocity, could come up with some very cool stats. Or if you're really having fun, microchip every ball with an accelerometer / gyro

At least you could display a message that says "this lane is reserved. Open lanes: 6, 7"

Forget Baba Is You, I want to see an LLM beat Elden Ring

Near the end of 2025, Google was on top - best LLM (Gemini 3 Pro), best video model (Veo 3.1), and best image model (Nano Banana). They seemed unstoppable.

And then, they stopped. Why? Are they having trouble with TPU?

When even Meta can come out with a better LLM than Google, something must be terribly wrong.

The Artifical Analysis has a link on their homepage but it 404's :/

https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/inkling

I typically disable autocorrect on Apple products because of this, cautiously optimistic about their improved speech models, but definitely worried that it's going to 'correct' technical jargon to more common words.

Kinda funny that their "cost-vs-performance" chart looks the same as the one for Composer 2.5[1], except that it includes Composer 2.5 at a completely different spot.

What are the chances that CursorBench ranks Cursor's model highest, and Cognition's bench ranks Cognition's model highest? Both are to be RL'd from Kimi as a base model, BTW.

I'd posit that it's not deliberate deception, but for both companies their training data and benchmarks come from the same dataset (Devin/Cursor interaction logs) so they naturally overfit.

1. https://cursor.com/blog/composer-2-5

If you're developing on top of LLM APIs directly, this is definitely not true. There are differences in how context caching works, in what's available through native harnesses, the types of tools you're fine-tuned on (GPT uses apply_patch while Claude uses edit, with different formats), the API surface (Agents SDK, Responses API, Managed Agents), cost structures, and best-practice guidance all around.

Not to mention the meta of account limits, billing, ZDR contracts, etc.

Only because one is a short answer and the other is not

When you're a student in a competitive program at a top university, graded on a curve, and you know your fellow classmates are cheating with AI, you have little choice but to do the same. Especially when jobs for new grads are harder to come by and there's more pressure to also go above and beyond with internships and side projects during your time in school. There's no way to compete without cheating.

Yep, I knew this was coming and did the same. Can't believe my MBP is now an appreciating asset!

This is insanely cool. My wallet is ready.

I built something similar at my org. Users simply connect the agent via OAuth and that inherits all of their permissions, so it acts as them.

What's cooler is then it can view/add/remove people from channels, so it can conduct access reviews -- overall I consider it a security improvement.

That has been going on for a while AFAIK

Is this new news?

This policy was published on June 8, 2026 with an effective date of July 8, 2026

I recently set up an agent with a Base wallet and made a few x402 API calls. Pretty convenient!

Yeah, if they can fit an 8B model that's really good at improving the output by thinking, running at 16K tok/s on Taalas would be mind-blowing.

The SpaceX IPO was a textbook crypto scam ICO. Launch with a huge media frenzy, super low float, "airdrop" to retail, etc.

We all know from previous token launches that the next few years will be a slow decline in price with just enough occasional bounces to keep up the hopes of the bag-holders.

This seems crazy low to me. AWS has default 3K IOPS and 125 MB/s throughput, meanwhile my Macbook Pro has 700K IOPS and 14.5GB/s throughput.

Is Amazon running on super outdated legacy networking?

Looks very impressive if the benchmarks translate to real world usage!

$1.4/$4.4 pricing and actually served at a pretty comparable price from DeepInfra or CloudFlare! Approx. 1/4th what Opus costs per token.

Looking forward to the artifical analysis test.

Yeah, I've tried many scanners and Cursor Bugbot is easily the best

Who are we gonna sue? LinkedIn? I think my place of employment has better things to do than sue Microsoft.

You also need to consider the energy released during the big bang as a prerequisite for creating that food and gasoline. The big bang released about 10^70 J of energy, roughly equivalent to eating 10^63 big macs

According to my research, LinkedIn only does this for executive and now recruiter-like titles, but not broadly. You may be able to in order to get "verified on LinkedIn" but it's not a requirement for showing association with a company.

https://www.theverge.com/news/771210/linkedin-recruiter-exec...

Yeah, all that's really saying is a weaker model with a better harness can beat a stronger model with a worse harness, specifically on the DRACO benchmark

This isn't really a surprising result. Needs more evidence to make a broader claim.

LinkedIn offers no way for $company to disavow users who claim to work for $company - they will appear on the official company page as long as it's in their profile.

We've had fake recruiters that claim to work for us running basically the same scam. These are great fake profiles: LinkedIn Premium, tons of relevant posts, etc... but they don't work for us, and we get angry messages from people saying our recruiter tried to scam them. No, they're not our recruiter despite showing up on our company page on LinkedIn. No number of reports could get them taken down.

I finally got it solved by buying drinks for a buddy of mine that works for LinkedIn, but not all startups have that connection!

If you're comparing raw calories to output, yes. Even gasoline has a caloric value, but humans can't drink gasoline. Growing and preparing food for human consumption uses a lot more energy than pumping and refining gasoline, so at the end of the day, human efficiency gains are not that impressive.

I don't see your point why export control is a silly tool. There's a difference between a VPN which I can prop up on my home server or a $5 VPS, vs a Mythos-scale closed source model running on millions of dollars of hardware

That's a good point