HN user

overview

22 karma
Posts1
Comments40
View on HN

Yes, I share the same concerns. Frankly I’m not sure what can be done on long term security when Russia has demonstrated its willingness to threaten nuclear weapons. I wonder if Putin being no more would result in a different Russia, one which isn’t focused on expansionism.

I don’t think this is the intention of the U.S. negotiating a peace deal, but a pause could give time to let Ukraine and europe to build up arms. I might be wrongly optimistic but I suspect a build of arms across europe would result in a more powerful force than Russia alone.

We’re only weeks since Trump taking office. Watching the full video, I think to me it seems there’s a mismatch in the response from HN and the reality of what happened there and is happening with the war. Ultimately, people are dying everyday in this war. I wonder if it’s in the best interest of those still alive to continue fighting and dying, or settling with territory being lost. If there really is no end in sight, why continue forcing people to die.

I like to think more about the individuals than anything else. If it really is possible to no longer have them die over things they realistically won’t get back, and it’s possible to freeze the progress of Russia with where it is today, isn’t making the war stop the top priority?

This makes the vascular implants produced by Humacyte more interesting. They’re made of cells which aren’t recognized by the immune system. Humacyte is in the beginning stages of seeing if they can fit beta cells into the produced vascular implants, while remaining undetected by the immune system.

Ignoring timelines, I’d say every single one of your predictions will become a reality. I think for a lot of folks, these integrations of AI into existing things seems natural, intuitive and common-sensical. I’m not sure why there’s such a mass of folks denying any of these things.

I’ve considered quitting my job and pursuing it full-time. Being an early adopter here seems like a sure fire way to succeed. I’m curious what your journey has been. I’m launching my product next week. Have a single customer signed on with a plan to scale it out, should the results come back positive.

Nice. High chance we’ll start seeing a ton more tooling innovation of this kind. I view gpt-4s information constraints very similarly to blockchains; it’s a bounded context. Blockchain solved this with oracles. I think there will be a more formal, widely recognized variant for gpt-4 pretty soon. Your feature for pulling down websites is basically it.

I found the context size for gpt-3 to be extremely limiting when I was hacking at ideas. Seeing this and knowing the context size for gpt-4 is larger is giving me motivation to pick up where I left off.

I actively reject conspiracy theories on the premise that they’re conspiracy theories. However, I can’t deny that this one is interesting. What if this is actually happening?

Obviously the easiest way to provoke thought within the skeptic is to ask, “If it is within the realm of possibilities for the human race to invent a driver allowing interstellar travel, why shouldn’t an extraterrestrial race also be capable of it?”

I would assume someone would counter with the fact that extraterrestrial life hasn’t been discovered. A question to often revisited. For all we know extraterrestrial life surrounds their inhabited planets with strict ingress and egress policies.

Airpods 100% affect / cause tinnitus. I tracked it on myself over several months once I noticed the relationship. In short, the airpods caused it and using them substantially intensifies the tinnitus I experience. I’m 24. Saddens me to know I’ll be living with this for the rest of my life.

Stumbling upon the post linked by OP after realizing the connection between my tinnitus levels and airpods is hard to put into words. The tinnitus developed during my first year using airpods. I would use them for at least an hour a day and always towards the lower 1/4 of the volume bar.

I agree with your side. Here’s my take. For some people, there’s a line you don’t cross. However, if the line is going to be crossed anyway, why not cross it in the best way possible? I’m inclined to believe that if done well, even those against it being done will end up finding appreciation for the next works.

This is very similar to my experience. TBH, being able to not talk through what I’m coding the _whole_ time, unlike what it shown in the official “What to expect” Google videos, was a relief. Unfortunately, that change in expectation sort of threw me off; there became uncertainty in what was expected of me. This uncertainty hindered my creative juices while problem-solving but nowhere near as bad as the interview prior, which I won’t go into since I am paranoid about the interviewer seeing this comment :)

Latency is the exact reason you would have a problem scaling any large system in the first place.

Not always. It depends on the architecture and your hosting strategy. I think it’s more likely for an instance of a web app to receive more requests than it can handle, causing the app to not service any requests.

This is one of my favorite things about programming. I mentally define the context of the file, method and method segment, in that order. This allows me to focus my search for words which are accurate to the given scope / context i.e. method / method segment and file-level concepts. From there, it’s a matter of identifying overlap and reusing key terms.

I think one thing people subconsciously or consciously struggle with is how explicit to be. I tend to side towards explicit because I’ve found the biggest trade off to be character count, which is not a big deal. I’ve received several compliments from other programmers when following this approach. A crucial step is to go though everything at the end and simplify / cut-out words that don’t provide meaningful value. Keep it iterative and constantly refine. Once you get used to this natural process of it, it becomes less stressful and more fun - almost like an exploration of ideas and concepts.