HN user

onlinejk

12 karma
Posts0
Comments25
View on HN
No posts found.

To clarify, am I right to interpret this:

* "I could assign phone number as primary login"

... as equal to this:

* Change old login value (wasabi@weasel.tv) to new login value (3035551212)

?

If so, personally I wouldn't like that most of my usernames were going to be same. I realize different usernames is security through obscurity at best, but that is my initial reaction.

Expand all the messages in this[^1] Google support thread, and note the comments from "Craig[^2]."

Or, even better: open a .gsheets or any .gEXT file in your favorite text editor. You'll see that they are comprised of web markup language, much like an XML doc. I don't have one in front of me atm, but I recall thinking, "it's basically XML that points one's browser to the appropriate Google app and a unique ID for the document."

[^1]: https://support.google.com/docs/thread/10078336?hl=en [^2]: https://support.google.com/docs/thread/10078336?hl=en&msgid=...

I don't have a startup to submit (of course, THAT'S the no-code generator site I'd love to see), but the design looks good.

I'm curious about behind the scenes, of course, like the number of "flows/ zaps/ etc" for a given submission. Some testimonials would be nice, IMHO.

Also, I noticed one minor typo, in Step 1: "This will only takes a few minutes."

"I have seen a lot of write-ups that recommend using a different port than tcp/22... [...] security by obscurity always leads to something weird [...] using SELinux, you are forced to run the secure-shell server on tcp/22."

Three cheers for two great reasons to not change the default port for SSH, among a lot of other detailed recommendations.

The links to additional tools (other than this NIST collection) are very handy, indeed.

A quick copypasta, sort, and count shows only 6 tools from that initial NIST site are annotated as having been updated in 2020.