HN user
That would be the most obvious resolution in the case that another election was required, though might be exploited as a means to get around term limits.
Another option might be the delegation of responsibility to the voting population to force a timely resolution of the election, greater understanding of the issues at hand, etc.
Has anyone seen analysis of elections nullified by vote?
For example, voters would be allowed to put the status of any and all candidates as null and/or a top vote as null. If the majority of votes cast as were null, another election would be run with all candidates from the prior election removed.
> "This has been shown in several studies"
Have links to these studies?
Are there any examples of the FBI creating or enabling predators so they are able to hunt them?
If so, is this illegal, and if not, why?
While speculation, Moxie's projects appear to have gotten (deservedly) a lot of attention, which brings a lot of feedback that's unfounded and potential malicious; for example, the f-droid comment about in my opinion fails to reflect both sides of the issue, and build security is VERY IMPORTANT and often ignored.
I don't know Moxie, but we've exchange messages before and never got the sense that off the cuff he was discounting any feedback. At a very highly level we agree about what he's doing, though I get the sense that anonymity is something we don't exactly agree about, but do understand a little of why he feels the way he does.
Do you feel f-droid's build security should be trusted, an if so, why?
> ""F-Droid has received criticism for distributing out-of-date versions of official applications and for its approach to application signing."
Always fun watch someone go cold turkey, since it becomes obvious to them their an infozombie really quick; reaching for a phone in their pocket that's not there every few minutes, going through withdrawals from not being able to read feeds/email, etc.
Just wait until machine learning gets really good at providing information that's of value that you "must have" to get through the day.
Aware of that issue (asked moxie about it on HN) and other issues too, but it doesn't change that there's zero reason to believe Moxie's intent is malicious and it's a stretch by any means to claim his contributions are anything but positive in sum.
Here's Moxie's related press release on doing E2E for Allo: https://whispersystems.org/blog/allo/
Curious if he'll comment on what happened:
https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=moxie
___
If you don't know about Moxie, highly suggest learning more about him:
The pH level of most drinks are not low enough to eat metal, roughly a level of 2 depending on the metal and reactions: http://www.sheltondentistry.com/patient-information/ph-value...
Citric Acid will eat metal, which is why liquids like orange and lime juice are not stored in metal containers.
As you likely know, AMP'd stands for Accelerated Mobile Pages Project; meaning AMP'd is for mobile traffic.
Might be wrong, but my understanding is that China currently leads the world in robotic labor; meaning all robotic labor preformed by robots own by Chinese companies regardless of where the robots are.
Unless I'm misunderstanding you, believe you're talking about the search result redirects that Google does; which is different, because the user get redirected the the real URL.
AMD'd links never redirect, if you click the X you're sent back to Google's results, there's no way to get to the real URL that an average user would easily be able to do, if the link is bookmarked the link it's not the real link, etc.
Super annoying feature, since Google hijacks the URL in the process.
There should be a way to opt-out that is simple and does not require the user to be signed-in to do.
Ironically, almost positive that Google hates when links are wrapped like this.
Open Source Version referenced by AJ: https://github.com/codevise/pageflow
Given this is in fact the source code that the developer in question has admitted was the basis for their code, it would be interesting to know if they were correctly using the MIT License here: https://github.com/codevise/pageflow/blob/master/MIT-LICENSE
It's a common term in this context, but would agree it's not completely Plain English either:
More to the point, if anyone truly believes they're able to do it for cheaper... Do it, don't comment about it.
The release date 10-4 is radio code for "understood":
Drones Make Elephants Go Berserk:
Military would be required to provide a scope of work, privately state what their budget is, and it would be open to anyone that meets the stated requirement.
Congress would review the proposals and select the winner and provide the budget needed.
Honestly at this point, strongly feel there needs to be a agency explicitly responsible for commercializing space - and neither FAA or NASA have a track record of doing this.
Why exactly is the FAA taking this over?
It's clearly stated that the US military is still going to be the primary source for the data.
Why not have an open RFP that anyone is able to provide a proposal and if the a existing agency doesn't win, make it independently run?
Author of the post has posted responses to comments on Reddit:
I'm sure marauders would thank you (nicely of course) for all of your hard work to supply them with your booty.
Revolution amoung subsets of a population is no revolution.
What is need is a mainstream movement to embrace crypto as a fundamental human right.
____________
Sidebar: The article is part of "Passcode" - a field guide to security and privacy from The Christian Science Monitor: http://passcode.csmonitor.com
Correct, it's called wrongful execution, and is a very real problem: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_execution
Mistakes happen, killing people for killing just sends the message that killing is a solution.
There is a long list of "murders" that were found not guilty after being executed: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrongful_execution
Beyond that, some confessed murders go on to contribute to society, for example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_S._Burroughs
Feel free to respond with your reasonings, though think in the end they'll fail to be reasonable.
Correct, half of the pallets get delivered and the dairy farm is owned by the launder too via a series of shell companies.
Best way to learn about money laundering (ML) is to study anti-money laundering (AML), since most laundering outfits aren't going to write a book about how they do what they do.
Most interesting thing about ML is that in cooking the books, they've got to keep very good records of what's been done, otherwise they've got no idea what's going on; which is counter intuitive, since you would think they would not keep records.
AJ is a professional company. If you read the other comments, which were posted after my comment, it's clear the developer made an agreement a freelance journalist, not AJ; which isn't even mentioned by the developer in the blog even though they're 100% aware of it. Given near the journalists or the developer have committed publicly to the terms of the agreement between them, I don't see the point in speculating what their agreement was; I do know on GitHub that the developer use the MIT license for some other code, which would have allowed the journalist to reuse the code where ever they wanted.
As for what to do, volumes of books are published on the topic. If the content was hosted in the US, the next step would be contact the ISP that's hosting the content.
Companies going out of their way to help the blind is not the norm.