HN user
recreational psychoactives of any kind
I’d prefer my ATC has a cup of coffee if they want it.
Aside from that, what does what happens in their off hours matter provided they’re coming to work sober?
This is nonsense, it’s obvious what type of safety OP meant. I have no idea what could be irresponsible about not including contrived, ridiculous scenarios.
It’s like saying he also should have accounted for the possibility fairies will turn you into a newt if you edit a gene, or into a rabbit, or if a wizard will turn you into a newt. You can make up an infinite amount of this bs.
Those tend to fall out of the “active use” category not long after entering it, so it’s probably not a big factor.
On a more serious note, had there been something special about SQLite supporting military use of their project that prompted this? Otherwise that’s the point of free software, people are free to do (mostly) whatever they want with it. Including building weapons. SQLite is so prevalent, it’s almost like pointing out you have to include cruise missiles in the count of active x86 chips, or $insert_bad_guy as an active user of roads and electricity.
As a 20%er who worked on this it’s a bit discouraging to see such a shallow dismissal. A lot of people put in a lot of work as a passion project to keep matrix from just disappearing.
Can’t win em all I guess.
Very impressive. One cool thing you can further do to improve perceived speed potentially at the expense of some bandwidth is to begin to preload pages when a link is hovered. There are a couple of libraries that will do this for you.
It can shave 100 - 200 ms off the perceived load time, and since your site is already near or below that threshold it might end up feeling like you showed the page before anyone even asked for it.
We're all closer to being millionaires than Jeff Bezos.
This is true in terms of orders of magnitude, but gets hilariously true when looking at the absolute numbers.
The difference in wealth of a homeless person and a (barely) millionaire is about a million ($1,000,000).
The difference in wealth of that millionaire and Jeff Bezos is about a Jeff Bezos ($138,999,000,000).
Similarly in Typescript, it seems like most of my code reviews consist of just telling people not to override null checking.
Adding a ! suppresses an error from the compiler, it doesn't fix an error in your code!
Not to mention every comment dpower has made is on a post related to Hiri. Maybe HN should just explicitly allow and tag accounts made to promote a company. It makes sense that people who create products want to talk about them, and they can certainly have valuable advice or insights. That might give them a platform to share more without people feeling there's some hidden motive.
Don't take this as me wanting it to happen, but what would it take for the decision to be made to kill these monkeys, and who would make it?
Is there a state or federal agency that's ever determined an animal to be a threat to people in an area to the degree that they then tried to wipe it out? Does it matter that the monkeys got put here because some company thought tourists would like them?
This is common, or at least, I've definitely had my parents do this for me, and I know my friends have too.
The logic is as follows: I need to be up early, my parents always get up early, and my alarm almost always works. If I have both to wake me up, there's a good chance I won't accidentally sleep in.
Here's a cached version from Google: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:BaMH6h...
Unfortunately it looks like there's a playground for you to try exploiting these vulnerabilities yourself that isn't cached.
I briefly had an Echo, and one thing my friends and I found funny was to have it play some annoying song, and then call out "Alexa, volume 10" because once it got that loud, the only way to make it stop was to go over and manually adjust the volume, as it couldn't hear anyone trying to turn it down.
I'm not sure that's wrong. Look at the (temporary) outrage whenever Facebook does a redesign, even Facebook is allowed to not look like Facebook.
Maybe this isn't the right place to ask, but could someone explain the rationale for taxing gifts within a family? Ignoring the possibility of using it to circumvent an income tax, etc., my initial thought is that if my dad wants to give me $30,001 this year, or even $300,000 this year, that he's already paid taxes on it and it's not the government's business. I feel the same way about inheritance taxes, although those are high enough I'm not too concerned about it.
I hope this doesn't start any arguments, but that's just my take on it and I'm open to hearing why it's a bad idea.
Edit: I appreciate the responses, they've cleared up some misconceptions I had and moved my viewpoint a bit.
Is there any requirement in the law that the women on the board actually do anything other than be a member of it? Would anything stop a woman from offering to sit on your board and pinky promise not to vote for $1k a year? Someone could do that with a whole bunch of companies and everybody wins.
Clicking the link to the HTML version of the book takes you to a page that makes you tweet (and grants some pretty far reaching twitter permissions) to read the book. If you click to the chapters folder and then on the individual .asciidoc files, GitHub will render them for you.
What did you do to train?
Maybe a better way to phrase the question then would be “What is the most useful categorization of life and non-life?”
It might be better to just call it version control for application states, rather than saying a "git-like CLI" for application states. When I hear "git-like CLI" I interpret that as "hard to use" and "confusing"
Even if it does prompt, 99% of users will read it as:
Attention: You must click OK to play this game.
From the wiki page:
When this effect is taken into account, typical gamma-ray bursts are observed to have a true energy release of about 1044 J, or about 1/2000 of a Solar mass (M) energy equivalent
So more, by about 6000 times.
This is consistant with WolframAlpha's output for amount of energy: 5.361e47 J. I tried to convert this to "number of years we could power the Earth", but it just changed it from one mind boggling number into another.
A 50-year old playing guitar is 1,000x cooler than a 50-year old mixing EDM tracks on Ableton, because he thinks it'll help him score 20-year chicks.
Corollary: A 50 year old mixing EDM tracks on Ableton because he likes it is just as cool as the first guy.
On an unrelated point, I was surprised when I saw how many citations there were in the linked document. I guess it's a law thing but it seemed like every sentence had something to back it up, even stuff like the meaning of "sorry" in the first two sentences, which I thought could be assumed.
You don't charge enough.
Alternative premise, tech interviews continue to become increasingly competitive, and if you want to be a true dev hirable by Google, etc. this is the output you need.
Disallowing autofill I could understand to prevent people from accidentally saving credentials on public devices.
Maybe disallowing pasting is a (bad) attempt to disallow automated password guessing.
According to stack exchange, it doesn't [0]. If that's wrong maybe I can fund a trip to space of my own by selling lead lined boxers.
[0] http://space.stackexchange.com/questions/14704/do-astronauts...
I think it's interesting that Guido went from being opposed in June 2011 [0] to supporting it in August 2016 [1] without any real indication of why he changed his mind, and bringing the issue back over three years after the last message to do it. Does anyone know of a reason why he changed his mind?
From the replies to that: "During a launch, anybody can call Elon and abort the launch." [0]. It seems like they want to go in the complete opposite direction of when NASA launched the Challenger despite an engineer telling them it would explode [1].
[0] https://twitter.com/zlsadesign/status/832995766436179969
[1] http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2016/01/28/464744781/...
To spoil the ending he mentions telling at shows, he ends up giving the money back knowing the bank was in the wrong [0].
I wonder how much of the story is true, surely over years of telling the story for audiences he's found that slight modifications have made it more entertaining. Combine that with the fact that our memories are already not that great, and I'd imagine that while the overall story is probably true, a lot of the specifics aren't.
[0] https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2012-08-13/performer...